`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 4:19-cv-01949-JSW JSW
`
`
`ORDER SETTING CASE
`MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
`REQUIRING JOINT CASE
`MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
`STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`The above matter having been assigned to the Honorable Jeffrey S. White, it is hereby
`
`ordered that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, a Case Management
`
`Conference shall be held in this case on July 12, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor,
`
`Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.
`
`Plaintiff(s) shall serve copies of this Order immediately on all parties to this action, and on
`
`any parties subsequently joined, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 5. Following service,
`
`plaintiff(s) shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance
`
`with Civil L. R. 5-5(a).
`
`The parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than five (5) court days
`
`prior to the conference. The joint case management statement shall address all of the topics set
`
`forth in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California - Contents of Joint
`
`Case Management Statement, which can be found on the Court’s website located at
`
`http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. See N.D. Civ L.R. 16-9. If any one or more of the parties is
`
`proceeding without counsel, the parties may file separate case management statements. Separate
`
`statements may also address all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order referenced above.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 4:19-cv-01949-JSW Document 35 Filed 04/15/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`The parties shall appear in person through counsel with full and complete authority: (1) to
`
`address all issues presented in their joint case management conference statement; and (2) to enter
`
`stipulations, make admissions, and agree to further scheduling dates. The parties shall identify the
`
`person who shall appear at the case management conference in the case management conference
`
`statement.
`
`Any request to reschedule the date of the conference shall be made in writing, and by
`
`stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) calendar days before the date of the conference and must
`
`be based upon good cause. In order to assist the Court in evaluating any need for disqualification
`
`or recusal, the parties shall disclose to the Court the identities of any person, associations, firms,
`
`partnerships, corporations or other entities known by the parties to have either (1) financial interest
`
`in the subject matter at issue or in a party to the proceeding; or (2) any other kind of interest that
`
`could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. If disclosure of non-party
`
`interested entities or persons has already been made as required by Civil L. R. 3-16, the parties
`
`may simply reference the pleading or document in which the disclosure was made. In this regard,
`
`counsel are referred to the Court's Recusal Order posted on the Court website at the Judges
`
`Information link at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: April 15, 2019
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`JEFFREY S. WHITE
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
