`Case 4:18-cv-07229—YGR Document 205-3 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 205-3 Filed 06/07/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`Gordnia, Talin
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`[External]
`
`Counsel,
`
`Jason Wolff <wolff@fr.com>
`Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:46 AM
`Smith, Ryan; Mays, Christopher; WSGR - Qualys/Finjan
`Aamir Kazi; Phillip Goter; Lawrence Jarvis; Nicole Williams; Elizabeth M. Wilton
`Finjan v. Qualys: motion for leave for additional pages
`
`As a precaution, Finjan will seek leave to file a 25 page reply for its SJ motion and opposition to Qualys’s
`motion for summary judgment. Finjan will file one brief addressing all issues that is 25 pages or less.
`
`Will Qualys stipulate to the additional pages, or will it oppose Finjan’s motion?
`
`The reason we raise this is Qualys titled its SJ motion a cross-motion. It is not a cross-motion, since it is not on
`the same issue Finjan filed on. Had it been filed as a SJ motion, Finjan would have 25 pages per Judge
`Gonzalez Roger’s Standing Order, as each side gets 25 pages of briefing for their summary judgment motion
`and opposition. Standing Order at 9.b; Local Rule 7-3. By Qualys calling its motion a cross-motion, it is unclear
`whether Finjan is limited to 15 pages (per the Standing Order on “cross-motions”) or 25 pages, per Local Rule
`7-3.
`
`Please let us know you are available for a meet and confer today if Qualys cannot stipulate to Finjan’s request.
`
`Thanks,
`Jason
`
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
`and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
