Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 1 of 8
`
`
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Megan A. Chacon (CA SBN 304912)
`chacon@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA SBN 291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 /Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Aamir A. Kazi (pro hac vice)
`kazi@fr.com
`Lawrence R. Jarvis (pro hac vice)
`jarvis@fr.com
`Fish and Richardson P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street Ne 21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Phone: (404) 879-7238/ Fax: 404-892-5002
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`Philip W. Goter (pro hac vice)
`goter@fr.com
`Robert P. Courtney (CA SBN 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South 6th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 /Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (pro hac vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax (617) 542-8906
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(OAKLAND DIVISION)
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE
`WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN
`LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL ITS REPLY IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION TO
`QUALYS INC.’S CROSS-MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF
`ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`I, K. Nicole Williams, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am licensed to practice in the State of California and am a principal in the law firm
`
`of Fish & Richardson P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiffs Finjan LLC in the above-captioned
`
`matter. I have personal knowledge of all the facts contained herein and, if called as a witness, I
`
`could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`As required under Civil L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A), Civil L.R. 79-5(e), and this Court’s
`
`Standing Order, the basis for asserting confidentiality and the grounds for filing under seal the
`
`documents listed below are as follows:
`
`of
`Identification
`Documents
`to be
`Sealed
`Finjan LLC’s Reply
`in Support of Motion
`for Summary
`Judgment and
`Opposition to
`Qualys’s Cross-
`Motion for Summary
`Judgment
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Responsive Separate
`Statement of
`Undisputed Material
`Facts
`
`Portion(s)
`Seal
`
`to
`
`Designating Party Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Qualys
`
`
`Qualys
`
`
`Highlighted
`Portions at:
`Page 6, lines 6–8;
`Page 9, lines 8,
`10–18, 20–23,
`25–27;
`Page 10, line 21;
`Page 12, lines
`27–28;
`Page 13, lines 1–
`2, 10, 12-13;
`Page 14, lines 3–
`5, 8–17, 21–24;
`Page 15, lines 5,
`8–10;
`Page 18, line 28;
`Page 19, lines 1,
`8, 11–13, 20, 23–
`26;
`Page 20, lines 1–
`2, 5–9, 12–14
`
`Highlighted
`portions at:
`Page 2, line 15;
`Page 4, lines 4–5;
`Page 7, line 28;
`Page 8, lines 1,
`3–4, 5–6, 8–9,
`10;
`Page 9, lines 2–6,
`1116, 18–25;
`Page 10, lines 1–
`7, 9–12;
`Page 11, line 16;
`Page 12, lines 8,
`
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`Ex. 8 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Nenad Medvidović,
`Ph.D. dated
`December 1, 2020)
`
`14–16, 18–20;
`Page 13, lines 4–
`7
`Pages 51–53, 67–
`69, 79–81, 84,
`99–100, 102,
`104, 107–108,
`111–121, 123,
`129–133, 137,
`139–140, and 156
`
`Qualys
`
`
`Ex. 14 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Aviel Rubin,
`Ph.D. taken March 4,
`2021)
`
`Ex. 15 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Rebuttal Expert
`Report of Dr. Avi
`Rubin Regarding
`U.S. Patent No.
`8,225,408 dated
`January 21, 2020)
`
`Ex. 16 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS00257792-
`QUALYS00257795)
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Ex. 17 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS01235879-
`QUALYS01235940)
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`Ex. 19 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Holger Kruse
`taken September 14,
`2020)
`
`Pages 7–8
`
`Qualys
`
`Ex. 20 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS02019776-
`QUALYS02019800)
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Ex. 21 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Stuart Stubblebine’s
`Rebuttal Expert
`Report Regarding
`Non-Infringement
`and Apportionment
`Issues (U.S. Patent
`Nos. 8,677,494;
`6,154,844 and
`7,418,731 dated
`January 12, 2021)
`Ex. 22 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Stuart
`Stubblebine, Ph.D.
`taken March 5, 2021)
`
`Ex. 24 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Opening Expert
`Report of Eric Cole,
`Ph.D. Regarding
`Infringement by
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Pages 129–132,
`150–152, 678–
`680, and 690–703
`
`Qualys
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY SOURCE CODE”
`under the Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY – SOURCE CODE”
`under the Protective Order
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`Qualys Inc. of Patent
`Nos. 6,154,844;
`8,677,494 and
`7,418,731 dated
`December 1, 2020)
`Ex. 25 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Eric Cole, Ph.D.
`taken March 2, 2021)
`
`Pages 90–96,
`133–135
`
`Qualys
`
`and from which
`confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This transcript reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`3.
`
`The highlighted portions of Finjan LLC’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment and Opposition to Qualys’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment reflect information
`
`Qualys has designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the
`
`Protective Order, and from which confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products
`
`could potentially be discerned.
`
`4.
`
`The highlighted portions of Finjan LLC’s Responsive Separate Statement of
`
`Undisputed Material Facts reflect information Qualys has designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order, and from which confidential
`
`information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Jason W. Wolff in Support of Finjan LLC’s Reply in
`
`Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Qualys’s Cross-Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment (“Wolff Declaration”) reflects
`
`information Qualys has designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order, and from which
`
`confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`Qualys previously filed publicly certain excerpts from the Expert Report of Nenad Medvidović,
`
`Ph.D. dated December 1, 2020, including pages 1, 27–30, 66, 85–91, 103, 109–110, 122, 124–126,
`
`138, and 157. Dkt. No. 195-9. Therefore, Finjan does not request that these portions of Exhibit 8
`
`be sealed. Finjan requests only the following pages of Exhibit 8 be sealed: 51–53, 67–69, 79–81,
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`84, 99–100, 102, 104, 107–108, 111–121, 123, 129–133, 137, 139–140, 156. Finjan has identified
`
`these portions in the unredacted versions sought to be sealed using a blue outline.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 14 to the Wolff Declaration is a deposition transcript Qualys designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective
`
`Order. Confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be
`
`discerned from this document.
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 15 to the Wolff Declaration is a document Qualys designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order. Confidential
`
`information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned from this
`
`document.
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 16 to the Wolff Declaration is a document Qualys designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order. Confidential
`
`information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned from this
`
`document.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 17 to the Wolff Declaration is a document Qualys designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order. Confidential
`
`information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned from this
`
`document.
`
`10.
`
`Exhibit 19 to the Wolff Declaration is a deposition transcript Qualys designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective
`
`Order. Confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be
`
`discerned from this document. Qualys previously filed publicly certain excerpts from the deposition
`
`23
`
`transcript of Holger Kruse, taken September 14, 2020, including pages 1, 9, and 134–136. Dkt. No.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`195-24. Therefore, Finjan does not request that these portions of Exhibit 19 be sealed. Finjan
`
`requests only the following pages of Exhibit 19 be sealed: 7–8. Finjan has identified these portions
`
`in the unredacted versions sought to be sealed using a blue outline.
`
`11.
`
`Exhibit 20 to the Wolff Declaration is a document Qualys designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order. Confidential
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned from this
`
`document.
`
`12.
`
`Exhibit 21 to the Wolff Declaration is a document Qualys designated “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order.
`
`Confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be discerned from
`
`this document.
`
`13.
`
`Exhibit 22 to the Wolff Declaration is a deposition transcript Qualys designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY SOURCE CODE” under the
`
`Protective Order. Confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially
`
`be discerned from this document.
`
`14.
`
`Exhibit 24 to the Wolff Declaration reflects information Qualys has designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” under the
`
`Protective Order, and from which confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products
`
`could potentially be discerned. Qualys previously filed publicly certain excerpts from the Expert
`
`Report of Eric Cole, Ph.D. dated December 1, 2020, including pages 1, 149, and 689. Dkt. No. 195-
`
`11. Therefore, Finjan does not request that these portions of Exhibit 24 be sealed. Finjan requests
`
`only the following pages of Exhibit 24 be sealed: 129–132, 150–152, 678–680, and 690–703. Finjan
`
`has identified these portions in the unredacted versions sought to be sealed using a blue outline.
`
`15.
`
`Exhibit 25 to the Wolff Declaration reflects information Qualys has designated
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order, and
`
`from which confidential information regarding Qualys’s accused products could potentially be
`
`discerned. Qualys previously filed publicly certain excerpts from the deposition transcript of Eric
`
`23
`
`Cole, Ph.D., taken March 2, 2021, including pages 1 and 131–132. Dkt. No. 195-14. Therefore,
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Finjan does not request that these portions of Exhibit 25 be sealed. Finjan requests only the
`
`following pages of Exhibit 25 be sealed: 90–96, 133–135. Finjan has identified these portions in
`
`the unredacted versions sought to be sealed using a blue outline.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201-1 Filed 06/01/21 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff Finjan has carefully balanced the need to protect highly confidential and
`
`proprietary information along with information that is reasonable for the public to know. Finjan has
`
`demonstrated “good cause” for filing this information under seal.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 1, 2021, in San Diego, California.
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT
`OF ADMIN MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`