Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Megan A. Chacon (CA SBN 304912)
`chacon@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA SBN 291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 /Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Aamir A. Kazi (pro hac vice)
`kazi@fr.com
`Lawrence R. Jarvis (pro hac vice)
`jarvis@fr.com
`Fish and Richardson P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street Ne 21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Phone: (404) 879-7238/ Fax: 404-892-5002
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`Philip W. Goter (pro hac vice)
`goter@fr.com
`Robert P. Courtney (CA SBN 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South 6th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 /Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (pro hac vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax (617) 542-8906
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(OAKLAND DIVISION)
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS
`REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`OPPOSITION TO QUALYS INC.’S
`CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT AND EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”), having reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-5,
`
`hereby moves the Court for permission to file under seal the following documents:
`
`of
`Identification
`Documents
`to be
`Sealed
`Finjan LLC’s Reply
`in Support of Motion
`for Summary
`Judgment and
`Opposition to
`Qualys’s Cross-
`Motion for Summary
`Judgment
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Responsive Separate
`Statement of
`Undisputed Material
`Facts
`
`Ex. 8 to the Wolff
`
`Portion(s)
`Seal
`
`to
`
`Designating Party Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Qualys
`
`
`Highlighted
`Portions at:
`Page 6, lines 6–8;
`Page 9, lines 8,
`10–18, 20–23,
`25–27;
`Page 10, line 21;
`Page 12, lines
`27–28;
`Page 13, lines 1–
`2, 10, 12-13;
`Page 14, lines 3–
`5, 8–17, 21–24;
`Page 15, lines 5,
`8–10;
`Page 18, line 28;
`Page 19, lines 1,
`8, 11–13, 20, 23–
`26;
`Page 20, lines 1–
`2, 5–9, 12–14
`Highlighted
`portions at:
`Page 2, line 15;
`Page 4, lines 4–5;
`Page 7, line 28;
`Page 8, lines 1,
`3–4, 5–6, 8–9,
`10;
`Page 9, lines 2–6,
`1116, 18–25;
`Page 10, lines 1–
`7, 9–12;
`Page 11, line 16;
`Page 12, lines 8,
`14–16, 18–20;
`Page 13, lines 4–
`7
`Pages 51–53, 67– Qualys
`
`Qualys
`
`
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 3 of 6
`
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Nenad Medvidović,
`Ph.D. dated
`December 1, 2020)
`
`
`
`69, 79–81, 84,
`99–100, 102,
`104, 107–108,
`111–121, 123,
`129–133, 137,
`139–140, and 156
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 14 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Aviel Rubin,
`Ph.D. taken March 4,
`2021)
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 15 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Rebuttal Expert
`Report of Dr. Avi
`Rubin Regarding
`U.S. Patent No.
`8,225,408 dated
`January 21, 2020)
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 16 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS00257792-
`QUALYS00257795)
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 17 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS01235879-
`QUALYS01235940)
`
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`Qualys
`
`Qualys
`
`Qualys
`
`Qualys
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 4 of 6
`
`Pages 7–8
`
`Qualys
`
`Ex. 19 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Holger Kruse
`taken September 14,
`2020)
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Ex. 20 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(QUALYS02019776-
`QUALYS02019800)
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`Qualys designated this
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order.
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Ex. 21 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Stuart Stubblebine’s
`Rebuttal Expert
`Report Regarding
`Non-Infringement
`and Apportionment
`Issues (U.S. Patent
`Nos. 8,677,494;
`6,154,844 and
`7,418,731 dated
`January 12, 2021)
`Ex. 22 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Stuart
`Stubblebine, Ph.D.
`
`Entirety
`
`Qualys
`
`Qualys designated this
`transcript “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY SOURCE CODE”
`under the Protective Order.
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 5 of 6
`
`taken March 5, 2021)
`
`Ex. 24 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`Opening Expert
`Report of Eric Cole,
`Ph.D. Regarding
`Infringement by
`Qualys Inc. of Patent
`Nos. 6,154,844;
`8,677,494 and
`7,418,731 dated
`December 1, 2020)
`Ex. 25 to the Wolff
`Declaration
`(Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript
`of Eric Cole, Ph.D.
`taken March 2, 2021)
`
`Pages 129–132,
`150–152, 678–
`680, and 690–703
`
`Qualys
`
`Pages 90–96,
`133–135
`
`Qualys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`This document reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY – SOURCE CODE”
`under the Protective Order
`and from which
`confidential information
`regarding Qualys’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This transcript reflects
`information Qualys has
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the
`Protective Order and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could potentially be
`discerned.
`
`Filed concurrently herewith and pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(c) are the confidential versions
`
`of Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to
`
`Qualys’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, Finjan LLC’s Responsive Separate Statement of
`
`Undisputed Material Facts, and Exhibits 8, 14–17, 19–22, and 24–25 to the Declaration of Jason W.
`
`Wolff in Support thereof, as well as a public redacted version of the Reply and Opposition, Separate
`
`Statement, and Exhibits.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard
`
`Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G), the Court may, in its discretion and for good cause,
`
`issue an order “requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 201 Filed 06/01/21 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Similarly, in this
`
`Circuit, the Court may seal documents and information in the case of a dispositive motion if there
`
`are “compelling reasons” to do so, and where “good cause” exists in the case of non-dispositive
`
`motions. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1095-1100 (9th Cir. 2016).
`
`A motion is considered “non-dispositive” when the motion is no more than “tangentially related” to
`
`the underlying cause of action. Id. at 1099. The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized
`
`showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex
`
`rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen Motors Corp.¸ 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation
`
`marks omitted). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated
`
`10
`
`reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 4796 (9th Cir.
`
`11
`
`1992). A request to seal material “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable
`
`12
`
`material.” L.R. 79-5(b).
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`B.
`
`Finjan’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported by Good Cause and is
`
`Narrowly Tailored
`
`Good cause exists to file the documents in question under seal, as described in the
`
`16
`
`Declaration of K. Nicole Williams In Support of Finjan Inc.’s Motion to File under Seal its Reply
`
`17
`
`in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Qualys’s Cross-Motion for
`
`18
`
`Summary Judgment and Exhibits (“Williams Sealing Decl.”) accompanying this motion to seal.
`
`19
`
`Finjan’s request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that has been designated as
`
`20
`
`confidential pursuant to the protective order entered in this case. For the foregoing reasons, Finjan
`
`21
`
`respectfully requests that the Court grant its request that the documents described above remain
`
`22
`
`under seal.
`
`23
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 1, 2021
`
`
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL ITS MOT. TO ___ AND EX. ___
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`