`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(OAKLAND DIVISION)
`
`
`
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`On February 8, 2021, Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) filed a Motion for Administrative
`
`Relief with this Court, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, for permission to file documents under
`
`seal. Upon consideration of this motion and the exhibits and declaration of K. Nicole Williams filed
`
`in support thereof (“Williams Decl.”), the Court finds good cause and compelling reasons for
`
`granting the request to file the documents described below under seal.
`
`1.
`
`There exist overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`
`access to the record for the following documents:
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 197-2 Filed 05/18/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`Ruling
`
`
`
`Document or Portion of Document Sought
`to be Sealed
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s Opposition to Qualys
`Inc.’s Renewed Motion to Strike Portions of
`Plaintiff’s Infringement Expert Reports at:
`Page 4, lines 17–18;
`Page 6, lines 1–9 and 26–28;
`Page 7, lines 1–4; and
`Page 8, lines 6–8.
`Exhibit A to the Declaration of Lawrence R.
`Jarvis (“Jarvis Declaration”) (Excerpts from
`the Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Avi Rubin
`Regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,225,408 dated
`January 12, 2020)
`Exhibit C to the Jarvis Declaration (Excerpts
`from the Expert Report of Nenad
`Medvidovic, Ph.D. dated December 1, 2020)
`Exhibit E to the Jarvis Declaration (Excerpts
`from Vulnerability Spreadsheet QUALYS-
`RUBIN0911)
`
`Evidence Offered in
`Support of Sealing
`Williams Decl. ¶ 3
`
`Williams Decl. ¶ 4
`
`Williams Decl. ¶ 5
`
`Williams Decl. ¶ 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Documents
`
`Under Seal is GRANTED with respect to the documents set forth above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: ____________________
`
`
`Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`