throbber
Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 175-2 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(OAKLAND DIVISION)
`
`
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
` [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`FINJAN, LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`On March 22, 2021, Plaintiff Finjan, LLC (“Finjan”) filed a Motion for Administrative
`
`Relief with this Court, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, for permission to file under seal its Letter
`
`To The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers From Finjan LLC Regarding Qualys Inc.’s Letter
`
`Requesting A Pre-Filing Conference For Its Summary Judgment Motion. Upon consideration of
`
`this motion and the declaration of Jason W. Wolff filed in support thereof, the Court finds good
`
`cause for granting the request to file the documents described below under seal.
`
`1.
`
`There exists overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`
`access to the record for the following documents:
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 175-2 Filed 03/22/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`Designating
`Party
`
`Qualys
`
`
`
`Identification of
`Documents to be
`Sealed
`Plaintiff Finjan
`LLC’s Letter to the
`Honorable Yvonne
`Gonzales Rogers
`from Finjan LLC Re
`Qualys Inc.’s Letter
`Requesting a Pre-
`Filing Conference for
`its Summary
`Judgment Motions
`
`Portion of
`Document to be
`Sealed
`Highlighted
`portions at :
`pg. 1, lines 15-19,
`21-22, 27-28;
`pg. 2, lines 1-3, 8-
`12, 15-23;
`pg. 3, lines 1-2
`
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`This document reflects
`information that Qualys
`designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF 34), and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`Qualys’s accused products
`could be potentially
`discerned. See Declaration of
`Jason W. Wolff (“Wolff
`Decl.”) ¶ 3.
`
`2.
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal its
`
`Letter To The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers From Finjan LLC Regarding Qualys Inc.’s
`
`Letter Requesting A Pre-Filing Conference For Its Summary Judgment Motion is GRANTED
`
`with respect to the documents set forth above.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: ____________________
`
`
`Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL
`Case No. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket