Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 5
`Case 4:18-cv-07229—YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`QUALYS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S INITIAL
`DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
`PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULES
`3-1 AND 3-2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________________
`FINJAN’S ASSERTED CLAIMS & INFRINGEMENT
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-1 AND 3-2
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`Cloud Suite (Enterprise, Express, Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized
`
`business, or Small business), and the Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants.
`
`Finjan accuses the following of Defendant’s products and services, and associated software and
`
`subscriptions, of infringing claims 1, 2, 14, 15, and 17 of the ‘731 Patent: Malware Detection (MD,
`
`MDS, Malware Detection Services), Web Application Scanning (WAS), Web Application Firewall
`
`(WAF), Secure Seal, Vulnerability Management (VM), Continuous Monitoring (CM),
`
`ThreatPROTECT (TP), Indication of Compromise (IOC), Policy Compliance (PC), Cloud Agent (CA)
`
`technology, the Knowledgebase, Qualys research labs, and Qualys Scanner Appliance and Virtual
`
`Appliance, identified in the attached Appendix C (“Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘731 Patent”),
`
`whether sold a la carte or as part of a bundled package, including but not limited to the Qualys Cloud
`
`Suite (Enterprise, Express, Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized business,
`
`or Small business), and the Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants.
`
`Finjan accuses the following of Defendant’s products and services, and associated software and
`
`subscriptions, of infringing claims 1-2, 5-14, and 17-25 of the ‘305 Patent: Malware Detection (MD,
`
`MDS, Malware Detection Services), Web Application Scanning (WAS), Web Application Firewall
`
`(WAF), Secure Seal, Vulnerability Management (VM), Continuous Monitoring (CM),
`
`ThreatPROTECT (TP), Indication of Compromise (IOC), Policy Compliance (PC), Cloud Agent (CA)
`
`technology, the Knowledgebase, Qualys research labs, and Qualys Scanner Appliance and Virtual
`
`Appliance, identified in the attached Appendix D (“Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘305 Patent”),
`
`whether sold a la carte or as part of a bundled package, including but not limited to the Qualys Cloud
`
`Suite (Enterprise, Express, Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized business,
`
`or Small business), and the Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants.
`
`Finjan accuses the following of Defendant’s products and services of infringing claims 1-2, and
`
`4 of the ‘154 Patent: Malware Detection (MD, MDS, Malware Detection Services), Web Application
`
`Scanning (WAS), Web Application Firewall (WAF), Secure Seal, Vulnerability Management (VM),
`
`Continuous Monitoring (CM), ThreatPROTECT (TP), Indication of Compromise (IOC), Policy
`
`Compliance (PC), Compliance Monitoring, Container Security, Cloud Agent (CA) technology, the
`3
`FINJAN’S ASSERTED CLAIMS & INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-1 AND 3-2
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`Knowledgebase, Qualys research labs, and Qualys Scanner Appliance and Virtual Appliance,
`
`identified in the attached Appendix E (“Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘154 Patent”), whether sold a
`
`la carte or as part of a bundled package, including but not limited to the Qualys Cloud Suite
`
`(Enterprise, Express, Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized business, or
`
`Small business), and the Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants.
`
`Finjan accuses the following of Defendant’s products and services, and associated software and
`
`subscriptions, of infringing claims 1, 3-8, 22-23, 29, and 35 of the ‘408 Patent: Malware Detection
`
`(MD, MDS, Malware Detection Services), Web Application Scanning (WAS), Web Application
`
`Firewall (WAF), Secure Seal, Vulnerability Management (VM), Continuous Monitoring (CM),
`
`ThreatPROTECT (TP), Indication of Compromise (IOC), Policy Compliance (PC), Cloud Agent (CA)
`
`technology, the Knowledgebase, Qualys research labs, and Qualys Scanner Appliance and Virtual
`
`Appliance, identified in the attached Appendix F (“Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘408 Patent”),
`
`whether sold a la carte or as part of a bundled package, including but not limited to the Qualys Cloud
`
`Suite (Enterprise, Express, Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized business,
`
`or Small business), and the Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants.
`
`Finjan accuses the following of Defendant’s products and services, and associated software and
`
`subscriptions, of infringing claims 10-16, and 18 of the ‘494 Patent: Malware Detection (MD, MDS,
`
`Malware Detection Services), Web Application Scanning (WAS), Web Application Firewall (WAF),
`
`Secure Seal, Vulnerability Management (VM), Continuous Monitoring (CM), ThreatPROTECT (TP),
`
`Cloud Agent (CA) technology, the Knowledgebase, Qualys research labs, and Qualys Scanner
`
`Appliance and Virtual Appliance, identified in the attached Appendix G, whether sold a la carte and as
`
`part of a bundled package, including but not limited to the Qualys Cloud Suite (Enterprise, Express,
`
`Express Lite), the Qualys Cloud Platform (Enterprise, Mid-sized business, or Small business), and the
`
`Qualys Cloud Platform for Consultants (“Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘494 Patent”) (collectively,
`
`the “Accused Instrumentalities”).
`
`The above identification is based on the information publicly available to Finjan as of the date
`
`hereof. Finjan anticipates that discovery may reveal additional products, features and services that
`4
`FINJAN’S ASSERTED CLAIMS & INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-1 AND 3-2
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 164-4 Filed 02/08/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`infringe the patents-in-suit. Finjan reserves the right to amend, modify, supplement, or narrow these
`
`contentions pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6, if necessary and appropriate, including identifying
`
`additional products, features and services, as it obtains additional information over the course of
`
`discovery and in light of the Court’s claim construction order.
`
`C.
`
`Claim Charts Identifying Claim Elements Present In Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`Finjan provides the following appendices pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-1(c):
`
` Appendix A shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘844 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘844 Patent
`
` Appendix B shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘968 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘968 Patent
`
` Appendix C shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘731 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘731 Patent
`
` Appendix D shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘305 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘305 Patent
`
` Appendix E shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘154 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘154 Patent
`
` Appendix F shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘408 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘408 Patent
`
` Appendix G shows how the Accused Instrumentalities of the ‘494 Patent infringe each of
`the asserted claims of the ‘494 Patent
`
`The Appendices are incorporated by reference herein. The citations in the Appendices are
`
`exemplary. In the attached Appendices, Finjan has subdivided each Asserted Claim to explain where
`
`the respective Accused Instrumentalities and other products/services meet each claim element. The
`
`subdivisions in the Appendices are not to be taken as an indication of the boundaries of claim elements
`
`with respect to doctrine of equivalents, or any other issue. Additionally, the Accused Instrumentalities
`
`and Defendant’s other products/services may infringe the Asserted Claims in multiple ways.
`
`The above identification is based on the information publicly available to Finjan as of the date
`
`hereof. Finjan reserves the right to provide alternative claim mappings or infringement contentions for
`
`5
`FINJAN’S ASSERTED CLAIMS & INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-1 AND 3-2
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`