throbber
Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 157 Filed 01/22/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`QUALYS’S SECOND
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`)))))))))))
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`QUALYS’S SECOND MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 157 Filed 01/22/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and
`the Stipulated Protective Order, Defendant Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) respectfully brings this Second
`Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Specifically, there are compelling reasons
`to file the following portions of the document under seal as identified below:
`
`Identification of Documents to be
`Sealed
`
`Motion to Strike
`Exhibit 8 to Defendant Qualys Inc.’s
`Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff
`Finjan LLC’s Infringement and
`Damages Expert Reports (Finjan’s
`Damages Contentions, served October
`30, 2019)
`
`Portion to be
`Sealed
`Selected Portions
`Entire Excerpted
`Document
`
`Entity That Designated
`the Information As
`Confidential
`Qualys
`Finjan designated the
`document “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS EYES’
`ONLY”
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G), the Court may, in its discretion and for good cause,
`issue an order “requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Similarly, in this
`Circuit, the Court may seal documents and information in the case of a dispositive motion if there
`are “compelling reasons” to do so, and where “good cause” exists in the case of non-dispositive
`motions. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1095-1100 (9th Cir. 2016). A
`motion is considered “non-dispositive” when the motion is no more than “tangentially related” to
`the underlying cause of action. Id. at 1099. The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized
`showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex
`rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen Motors Corp.¸ 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal
`quotation marks omitted). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of
`articulated reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 476 (9th
`Cir. 1992). A request to seal material “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable
`material.” L.R. 79-5(b).
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-1-
`
`QUALYS’S SECOND MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 157 Filed 01/22/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`Qualys seeks to seal the attached exhibit, which contain Qualys confidential information as
`detailed in the Declaration of Christopher D. Mays accompanying this second motion to seal.
`Qualys has narrowly tailored its request with this Administrative Motion seeking to file under seal
`only the documents containing confidential information pursuant to the Stipulated Protective
`Order governing treatment of confidential information exchanged during discovery.
`III.
`CONCLUSION
`Qualys has shown good cause and compelling reasons for this request to file the above-
`referenced portions of the documents under seal. This request is narrowly tailored to seal only
`information that is regarded as confidential. For these reasons, Qualys respectfully requests that
`the Court grant its Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal.
`
`DATED: January 22, 2021
`
`By:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Christopher D. Mays
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-2-
`
`QUALYS’S SECOND MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket