`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Megan A. Chacon (CA SBN 304912)
`chacon@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone:(858) 678-5070 /Fax:(858) 678-5099
`
`Robert P. Courtney (CA SBN 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South 6th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone:(612) 335-5070 /Fax:(612) 288-9696
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (pro hac vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone:(617) 542-5070/ Fax (617) 542-8906
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`FINJAN LLC,
`
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC.,
`
`Defendant
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER RE PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF
`CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS.
`6,154,844 AND 7,418,731
`
`Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez
`Rogers
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 154 Filed 01/14/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`
`In an effort to narrow and streamline the issues before the Court, Plaintiff Finjan LLC
`
`2
`
`(“Finjan”) and Defendant Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) hereby agree and stipulate:
`
`3
`
`Finjan’s claims for infringement of claims 2, 3, 9, 21, 22, 23, 32, 42 and 44 of U.S. Patent
`
`4
`
`No. 6,154,844 and claims 1, 2, 14 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,731 are dismissed with prejudice
`
`5
`
`pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
`
`6
`
`Qualys’s counterclaims relating to claims 2, 3, 9, 21, 22, 23, 32, 42 and 44 of U.S. Patent
`
`7
`
`No. 6,154,844 and claims 1, 2, 14 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,731 are also dismissed.
`
`Each party shall bear its own costs and fees pertaining to the dismissed claims.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`Dated: January 8, 2021
`
`*
`
`By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff
`Jason W. Wolff
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith
`Ryan R. Smith
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 154 Filed 01/14/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`
`I, Jason W. Wolff, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has
`
`3
`
`been obtained from each signatory hereto.
`
` /s/ Jason W. Wolff
`Jason W. Wolff
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`January 14, 2021
`
`____________________________________
`Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`
`2
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
