1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 151 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Ryan P. O’Connor (CA SBN 253596)
`oconnor@fr.com
`Megan A. Chacon (CA SBN 304912)
`chacon@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone:(858) 678-5070 /Fax:(858) 678-5099
`
`Robert P. Courtney (CA SBN 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South 6th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone:(612) 335-5070 /Fax:(612) 288-9696
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (pro hac vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone:(617) 542-5070/ Fax (617) 542-8906
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`12/4/20
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`ORDER GRANTING
`STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN
`MOTIONS
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`FINJAN LLC,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC.,
`
`Defendant
`
`Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`Date: January 12, 2021
`Time: 2:00pm
`Location: Zoom Teleconference1
`
`1 Per the Court’s Notice regarding Civil Law and Motion Calendars and its Order at D.I. 48.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN MOTIONS
`
`S D ISTRICT
`
`C O
`
`E
`
`T
`
`A
`
`S T
`
`I T I S S O O R D E R E D
`
`U
`
`R
`
`T
`
`ORNIA
`
`D
`
`UNITE
`
`N O R
`
`T
`
`J u d g e Y v o n n e G o n z a l e z R o g e r s
`C ALIF
`
`
`H ER
`
`N
`
`DISTRI C T
`
`F
`
`O
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 151 Filed 12/04/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) and Defendant Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) hereby agree and
`stipulate to bring this Administrative Motion Under Civil L.R. 7-11 to withdraw the following
`motions:
`
` Defendant Qualys, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
`12(c)) (Dkt. 124).
`
` The portions of Defendant Qualys, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s
`Infringement Contentions (Dkt. 126) that are directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,965,968
`and 8,141,154.
`On October 22, 2020, Qualys filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Fed. R. Civ.
`Proc. 12(c)) (Dkt. 124) directed to U.S. Patent No. 7,975,305. On November 5, 2020, Finjan filed
`an opposition to that motion (Dkt. 132), and on November 12, 2020 Qualys filed a reply in support
`of that motion (Dkt. 142).
`On October 30, 2020, Qualys filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s Infringement
`Contentions (Dkt. 126) directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,965,968, 8,141,154, 8,225,408, and
`8,677,494. On November 13, 2020, Finjan filed an opposition to that motion (Dkt. 143), and on
`November 20, 2020, Qualys filed a reply in support of that motion (Dkt. 145).
`On November 25, 2020, Finjan and Qualys filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to
`Dismiss Certain Patents-in-Suit and Counterclaims (Dkt. 148). Should the Court enter that
`Proposed Order (Dkt. 148), U.S. Patent Nos. 7,975,305, 6,965,968, and 8,141,154 will no longer
`be asserted in this case and it will no longer be necessary for the Court to decide (i) Qualys’s
`Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 124), which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 7,975,305,
`and (ii) the portions of Qualys’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s Infringement Contentions
`(Dkt. 126) that are directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,965,968 and 8,141,154. Because Qualys had
`filed the reply briefs in support of both of its motions (Dkt. 142, 145) before the parties filed the
`stipulation (Dkt. 148), Qualys is unable to withdraw the motions under Civil L.R. 7-7(e) and
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`1
`
`STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN MOTIONS
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 151 Filed 12/04/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`accordingly brings this administrative motion under Civil L.R. 7-11 to withdraw the above
`identified motions out of time.2
`
`Dated: December 2, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff
`Jason W. Wolff
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`By: /s/ Talin Gordnia
`TALIN GORDNIA
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`I, Talin Gordnia, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been
`obtained from each signatory hereto.
`
`By: /s/ Talin Gordnia
`TALIN GORDNIA
`
`2 The remainder of Defendant Qualys Inc.’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s
`Infringement Contentions (Dkt. 126), which is directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,225,408 and
`8,677,494, is not being withdrawn as these patents continue to be asserted in the case.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`2
`
`STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN MOTIONS
`
`