Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 97
`Case 4:18-cv-07229—YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 97
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 97
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`DEFENDANT QUALYS INC.’S
`PATENT L.R. 3-3, 3-4
`DISCLOSURES
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 3 of 97
`
`QUALYS’S INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`Defendant Qualys, Inc. (“Qualys”) provides its L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures to Plaintiff
`Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) with respect to the asserted claims identified by Finjan in its Initial
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions1 served on April 19, 2019
`(“Asserted Claims”). The Asserted Claims are as follows:
`
`• Claims 1-9, 11, 15-17, 21-23, 32, and 41-44 of U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844 (“the ’844
`Patent”);
`
`• Claims 1, 6-7, 9-11, 13-15, 23, 26 and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 6,965,968 (“the ’968
`Patent”);
`
`• Claims 1-2, 14-15 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,731 (“the ’731 Patent”);
`• Claims 1-2, 5-15, and 17-25 of U.S. Patent No. 7,975,305 (“the ’305 Patent”);2
`• Claims 1-2 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 (“the ’154 Patent”); and
`• Claims 1, 3-8, 22-23, 29, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 8,225,408 (“the ’408 Patent”).
`• Claims 10-16 and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 (“the ’494 Patent”);
`With respect to each Asserted Claim, Qualys identifies in compliance with Patent L.R. 3-
`3: (a) the identity of each item of prior art that allegedly anticipates each asserted claim or
`renders it obvious; (b) whether each item of prior art anticipates each asserted claim or renders it
`obvious; (c) a chart identifying specifically where and how in each alleged item of prior art each
`limitation of each asserted claim is found; and (d) any grounds of invalidity under 35 U.S.C.
`§101, indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112(2), or enablement or written description 35 U.S.C. §
`112(1) of any of the Asserted Claims. This identification is based on information presently
`known to Qualys and is subject to its ongoing investigation. Qualys reserves the right to
`
`1 Qualys expressly reserves the right to object to the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions and/or
`to move to strike the contentions, in whole or in part.
`
`2 Finjan has not identified any accused products or provided any infringement contention claim charts for Claim
`15 of the ’305 Patent.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-1-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 4 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`supplement and/or amend these Invalidity Contentions in accordance with the rules and orders of
`this Court.
`Qualys makes these disclosures without waiving or contradicting any position that
`Finjan’s Disclosure of Infringement Contentions is deficient for failing to comply with the Patent
`Local Rules and applicable case law.
`I.
`GENERAL RESERVATIONS
`The following contentions are subject to the reservations stated above and subject to
`amendment pursuant to at least Patent L.R. 3-6, Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`Procedure to the extent appropriate in light of, for example, ongoing investigation and discovery
`regarding the defenses asserted by Qualys, any Court-ordered claim construction related to any
`asserted claim, and the review and analysis of expert discovery.
`The information and documents that Qualys produces are provisional and subject to
`further revision as follows: Qualys expressly reserves the right to amend the disclosures and
`document production herein should Finjan provide any information that it failed to provide in its
`Infringement Contentions, has not produced in discovery, and/or should Finjan amend its
`Infringement Contentions. Further, because discovery is not yet complete and because Qualys’s
`search for, and analysis of, relevant prior art is ongoing, Qualys reserves the right to amend the
`information provided herein, including identifying, charting, and relying on additional prior art,
`should Qualys’s further search and analysis yield additional information or references (or based
`on information and documents Finjan produced in discovery), consistent with the Local Patent
`Rules for the Northern District of California and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`Moreover, Qualys reserves the right to revise any contentions concerning the invalidity of the
`Asserted Claims, which may change depending upon any findings as to the priority or invention
`date of the Asserted Claims, and/or positions that Finjan or expert witness(es) may take
`concerning claim construction, infringement, and/or invalidity issues.
`Prior art not included in these contentions, whether known or not known to Qualys, may
`become relevant. In particular, Qualys is currently unaware of the extent, if any, to which Finjan
`will contend that limitations of the Asserted Claims are not disclosed in the prior art identified by
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-2-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 5 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Qualys. To the extent that such an issue arises, Qualys reserves the right to identify other prior
`art that would render obvious the allegedly missing limitation(s) of the disclosed system or
`method.
`To the extent the following contentions reflect constructions of claim limitations
`consistent with or implicit in Finjan’s Infringement Contentions, no inference is intended nor
`should any be drawn that Qualys agrees with Finjan’s interpretation or understanding of any
`claim limitation accused of being present literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and
`Qualys expressly reserves the right to contest Finjan’s understanding or interpretation of such
`claim limitations. Qualys offers the following invalidity contentions in response to Finjan’s
`Infringement Contentions. Qualys offers the following invalidity contentions without prejudice
`as to (a) any position Qualys may ultimately take regarding any claim construction issues, and
`(b) Qualys’s understanding or interpretation of any claim limitation accused of being present
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`Qualys further intends to rely on inventor admissions concerning the scope of the prior
`art relevant to the asserted patents found in, inter alia: the patent prosecution history
`corresponding to each of the asserted patents and any patents or patent applications related to the
`asserted patents; any deposition testimony of any named inventor on any of the asserted patents
`and any patents or patent applications related to the asserted patents in this action or any other
`action; and the papers filed and any evidence submitted by Finjan in connection with this action.
`Qualys’s claim charts in Exhibits A-G cite to particular teachings and disclosures of the
`prior art as applied to features of the Asserted Claims. However, persons having ordinary skill in
`the art generally may view an item of prior art in the context of other publications, literature,
`products, and understanding. As such, the cited portions are only examples, and Qualys reserves
`the right to rely on uncited portions of the prior art (including any information incorporated by
`reference); and on other publications, expert testimony, and other evidence as aids in
`understanding and interpreting the cited portions, as providing context thereto, and as additional
`evidence that the prior art discloses a claim limitation or an asserted claim as a whole. Qualys
`further reserves the right to rely on uncited portions of the prior art references (including any
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-3-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 6 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`information incorporated by reference), other publications, and testimony (including expert
`testimony) to establish that an item of prior art discloses a claim limitation or an asserted claim
`as a whole, and to establish bases for combinations of certain items of prior art that render the
`Asserted Claims obvious. Where Qualys cites to a particular figure in prior art, the citation
`should be understood to encompass the caption and description of the figure and any text relating
`to or discussing the figure. Conversely, where Qualys cites to particular text referring to a
`figure, the citation should be understood to include the figure as well.
`The items of prior art disclosed in the claim charts in Exhibits A-G may disclose the
`limitations of the Asserted Claims explicitly and/or inherently, and they may be relied upon to
`show the state of the art in the relevant time frame. The suggested obviousness combinations are
`provided in the alternative to Qualys’s anticipation contentions and are not to be construed to
`suggest that any item of prior art included in the combinations is not by itself anticipatory.
`Qualys reserves the right to assert that the Asserted Claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 102(f) in the event that Qualys obtains evidence that the inventors named in any of the asserted
`patents did not invent (either alone or in conjunction with others) the subject matter claimed in
`the asserted patents. If Qualys obtains such evidence, it will provide the name of the person(s)
`from whom and the circumstances under which the invention or any part of it was derived.
`Qualys also reserves the right to challenge any of the claim terms herein under 35 U.S.C.
`§§ 101 and 112, including by arguing that they are patent-ineligible, indefinite, not supported by
`the written description, not enabled, or fail to disclose the best mode contemplated by the
`inventor(s). Accordingly, nothing stated herein shall be construed as a waiver of any argument
`available under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, and 112.
`Qualys reserves the right to modify, amend, or further supplement these contentions to
`show the invalidity of any additional claims that the Court may allow Plaintiff to later assert.
`Qualys further reserves the right to supplement its Patent L.R. 3-4 document production should it
`later find additional responsive documents.
`For example, Finjan has agreed to produce all prior art that has ever been asserted against
`the Asserted Patents in the past or present, but has not yet done so. Qualys reserves the right to
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-4-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 7 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`supplement these invalidity contentions based on information Finjan later produces that is not
`presently in Qualys’s possession, custody, or control.
`II.
`PRIORITY DATE
`For each of the Asserted Claims, Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any basis upon which
`the claims are entitled to a priority date earlier than the filing date of the applications. The
`priority dates of the Asserted Claims are no earlier than the filing dates of the respective patent
`applications at least because: any claim to earlier priority documents was not timely and properly
`claimed, there is no continuity of disclosure, there is insufficient disclosure in the earlier priority
`documents, and there is no specific claim of priority within the earlier priority documents; and
`any claim to an earlier date of conception is not sufficiently supported by evidence and was not
`adequately coupled with sufficient reduction to practice and diligence.
`For example, Finjan alleges that the claims of the ‘844 Patent are entitled to a priority
`date of November 8, 1996. However, the Court in Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. found
`that the claims of the ‘844 Patent are entitled to a priority date no earlier than December 22,
`1997. See Case No. 5:13-cv-03999-BLF (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. No. 486 at p. 7 (Nov. 20, 2015).
`Moreover, Finjan also alleges that the claims of the ‘731 Patent are entitled to a priority date of
`November 8, 1996. However, the Court in Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. found that the
`claims of the ‘731 Patent are entitled to a priority date of November 6, 1997. See id.at 9.
`III.
`PATENT L.R. 3-3(a): IDENTIFICATION OF PRIOR ART
`Patent L.R. 3-3(a) requires the following:
`The identity of each item of prior art that allegedly anticipates each asserted claim
`or renders it obvious. Each prior art patent shall be identified by its number,
`country of origin, and date of issue. Each prior art publication shall be identified by
`its title, date of publication, and where feasible, author and publisher. Each alleged
`sale or public use shall be identified by specifying the item offered for sale or
`publicly used or known, the date the offer or use took place or the information
`became known, and the identity of the person or entity which made the use or
`which made and received the offer, or the person or entity which made the
`information known or to whom it was made known. For pre-AIA claims, prior art
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f) shall be identified by providing the name of the person(s)
`from whom and the circumstances under which the invention or any part of it was
`derived. For pre-AIA claims, prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) shall be identified
`by providing the identities of the person(s) or entities involved in and the
`circumstances surrounding the making of the invention before the patent
`applicant(s).”
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-5-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 8 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3(a) and subject to Qualys’s reservation of rights in these Contentions,
`Qualys identifies each currently known item of prior art that it knows to either anticipate or
`render obvious one or more Asserted Claims in Tables 1-4 below:
`
`• Table 1 identifies each prior art patent by its number, country of origin, filing date, and
`issue date.
`
`• Table 2 identifies each prior art patent publication by its number, country of origin, filing
`date, and publication date.
`
`• Table 3 identifies each prior art publication by its title, publication date, and where
`feasible, author and publisher.
`
`• Tables 4 identifies prior art items, such as products or systems, for which Qualys believes
`qualify as prior art, and expects to receive additional documentation. Table 4 also
`identifies the prior art item offered for sale or publicly used or known in the “Prior Art
`Item” column, the date the offer or use took place or the information became known in
`the “Date” column, and the identity of the person or entity which made the use or which
`made and received the offer, or the person or entity which made the information known
`or to whom it was made known in the “Identity” column.
`Whether any item of prior art anticipates or renders obvious any asserted claim may depend upon
`claim construction. Discovery is ongoing, and Qualys’s prior art investigation and third-party
`discovery is therefore not yet complete. The tables of prior art provided herein are not exclusive,
`and Qualys’s production pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-4 and supplemental production may contain
`additional items of prior art that render one or more of the Asserted Claims invalid. Qualys
`reserves the right to rely on both the listed and unlisted items of prior art produced pursuant to
`Patent L.R. 3-4, as well as other prior art that may become known and/or relevant during the
`course of this action. Qualys reserves the right to present additional items of prior art under 35
`U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 that are located during the course of discovery or further investigation.
`For example, Qualys expects to receive documents from third parties (either through informal
`requests or under subpoena) that are believed to have knowledge, documentation, or
`corroborating evidence concerning any prior art listed in Tables 1-4 and any additional prior art.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-6-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 9 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`In addition, Qualys reserves the right to assert invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 102(c), (d), or (f) to
`the extent that discovery or further investigation yield information forming the basis for such an
`assertion.
`In addition, Qualys incorporates by reference and reserves the right to rely upon all prior
`art references listed and/or asserted as invalidating prior art by any alleged infringers in any other
`litigation (past, present/ongoing, or future) and/or re-examination involving the patents-in-suit
`and other related patents, including but not limited to:
`
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-06555 (N.D. Cal.)
`Finjan, Inc. v. Rapid7, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-01519 (D. Del.)
`•
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-02621 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Carbon Black, Inc., No. 5:18-cv-01760 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Zscaler, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-06946 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-05659 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Bitefender Inc., No. 4:17-cv-04790 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. SonicWall, Inc., No. 5:17-cv-04467 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. ESET, LLC, No. 3:17-cv-00183 (S.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. AVG Technologies USA, Inc., No. 5:17-cv-00283 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 5:17-cv-00072 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. F5 Networks, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-06955 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. ESET, LLC, No. 3:16-cv-03731 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems LLC, No. 5:15-cv-03295 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., No. 4:14-cv-04908 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec, Corp., No. 4:14-cv-02998 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Websense, Inc., No. 5:14-cv-01353 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc., No. 3:14-cv-01197 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., No. 4:13-cv-05808 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Websense, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-04398 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-03999 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. FireEye, Inc., No. 4:13-cv-03133 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Finjan, Inc. v. McAfee Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00593 (D. Del.)
`• Finjan Software Ltd. v. Aladdin Knowledge Systems Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00300 (D. Del.)
`Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2019-00026
`•
`-7-
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 10 of 97
`
`• Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2017-02154
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00498
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01894
`•
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00479
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00149
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00150
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00493
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-02000
`• ESET, LLC v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2017-01738
`Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2019-00031
`•
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-01071
`•
`• Proofpoint, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00937
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00151
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01979
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01547
`•
`• FireEye, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2017-00157
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-01441
`• Proofpoint, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00967
`• Proofpoint, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00970
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00955
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00956
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00157
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-02001
`• Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2017-02155
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-01443
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-01174
`• Blue Coat Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00890
`• Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2016-00159
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01897
`•
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01892
`•
`Sophos Inc. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR 2015-01022
`•
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-8-
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 11 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Qualys further incorporates by reference all invalidity contentions and any supplemental or
`amended invalidity contentions served on Finjan by any defendant in other litigation (past,
`present/ongoing, or future), including the cases listed above. Qualys intends to rely upon any
`additional prior art references discussed or disclosed in any expert report on the invalidity of the
`patents-in-suit, in this action or any other litigation (past, present/ongoing, or future) and/or re-
`examination involving the patents-in- suit and any related patents. Qualys also intends to rely on
`references identified in the file histories of the patents-in-suit, any related applications or issued
`patents (e.g., continuations, continuations-in-part, divisional, foreign counterparts etc.), as well
`as any re-examinations, IPR, or reissue of the patents-in-suit or related patents. Qualys
`incorporates by reference those prior art references herein. Qualys has already requested such
`contentions and prior art from Finjan in discovery, but to date Finjan has not yet produced
`documents responsive to that request.
`A.
`Prior Art Patents
`
`Patent No.
`Item No.
`U.S. 4,864,616
`1.
`U.S. 5,579,509
`2.
`U.S. 5,337,360
`3.
`U.S. 5,319,776
`4.
`U.S. 5,283,830
`5.
`U.S. 5,440,723
`6.
`U.S. 5,414,833
`7.
`U.S. 5,475,753
`8.
`U.S. 5,606,668
`9.
`U.S. 5,675,711
`10.
`U.S. 5,881,151
`11.
`WO 95/27249
`12.
`WO 95/33237
`13.
`U.S. 5,720,033
`14.
`U.S. 5,678,041
`15.
`U.S. 5,757,915
`16.
`U.S. 5,623,600
`17.
`U.S. 6,401,241
`18.
`U.S. 5,572,643
`19.
`U.S. 5,787,175
`20.
`U.S. 5,680,461
`21.
`U.S. 5,692,047
`22.
`23.
`U.S. 6,067,575
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`TABLE 1
`Country of
`Origin
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`-9-
`
`Filing Date
`10/15/87
`02/08/91
`04/06/92
`09/29/92
`09/30/92
`01/19/93
`10/27/93
`11/12/93
`12/15/93
`05/13/94
`07/20/94
`04/03/95
`05/30/95
`07/25/95
`08/25/95
`08/25/95
`09/26/95
`10/06/95
`10/19/95
`10/23/95
`10/26/95
`12/08/95
`12/08/95
`
`Issue Date
`09/05/89
`11/26/96
`08/09/94
`06/07/94
`02/01/94
`08/08/95
`05/09/95
`12/12/95
`02/25/97
`10/07/97
`03/09/99
`10/12/95
`12/07/95
`02/17/98
`10/14/97
`05/26/98
`04/22/97
`06/04/02
`11/05/96
`07/28/98
`10/21/97
`11/25/97
`05/23/00
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 12 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Item No.
`24.
`25.
`26.
`27.
`28.
`29.
`30.
`31.
`32.
`33.
`34.
`35.
`36.
`37.
`38.
`39.
`40.
`41.
`42.
`43.
`44.
`45.
`46.
`47.
`48.
`49.
`50.
`51.
`52.
`53.
`54.
`55.
`56.
`57.
`58.
`59.
`60.
`61.
`62.
`63.
`64.
`65.
`66.
`67.
`
`Patent No.
`U.S. 6,571,338
`U.S. 5,740,441
`U.S. 6,526,565
`U.S. 5,809,230
`U.S. 5,845,281
`U.S.5,933,503
`U.S. 5,889,943
`U.S. 5,673,316
`U.S. 5,815,709
`U.S. 5,884,033
`U.S.6,263,442
`U.S. 5,842,040
`U.S. 5,987,123
`JPH1021134
`U.S. 5,894,516
`U.S. 5,889,952
`U.S. 5,911,043
`U.S. 5,951,698
`U.S. 5,832,274
`U.S. 6,083,279
`U.S. 6,253,323
`U.S. 6,367,012
`U.S.5,740,248
`U.S. 6,088,801
`U.S. 6,167,520
`U.S. 5,974,549
`U.S.6,167,522
`U.S.6,092,147
`U.S. 5,987,611
`EP0813133
`U.S. 5,940,590
`U.S. 5,949,415
`U.S.6,175,924
`U.S. 6,598,033
`U.S. 5,991,810
`U.S. 6,275,938
`U.S. 5,963,742
`U.S. 5,983,348
`U.S. 6,886,013
`U.S. 6,170,012
`U.S.6,170,057
`U.S. 6128,774
`U.S.6,148,401
`U.S. 6,021,510
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`TABLE 1
`Country of
`Origin
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Japan
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`
`-10-
`
`Filing Date
`12/20/95
`12/20/95
`12/21/95
`01/16/96
`01/31/96
`03/15/96
`03/29/96
`03/29/96
`04/23/96
`05/15/96
`05/30/96
`06/18/96
`07/03/96
`07/04/96
`07/10/96
`08/14/96
`10/01/96
`10/02/96
`10/09/96
`10/10/96
`11/01/96
`12/06/96
`12/19/96
`01/10/97
`01/29/97
`03/27/97
`04/01/97
`04/15/97
`05/06/97
`05/20/97
`05/31/97
`06/16/97
`06/20/97
`07/14/97
`08/01/97
`08/28/97
`09/08/97
`09/10/97
`09/11/97
`09/12/97
`10/16/97
`10/28/97
`11/19/97
`11/24/97
`
`Issue Date
`05/27/03
`04/14/98
`02/25/03
`09/15/98
`12/01/98
`08/03/99
`03/30/99
`09/30/97
`09/29/98
`03/16/99
`07/17/01
`11/24/98
`11/16/99
`01/23/98
`04/13/99
`03/30/99
`06/08/99
`09/14/99
`11/03/98
`07/04/00
`06/26/01
`04/02/02
`04/14/98
`07/11/00
`12/26/00
`10/27/99
`12/26/00
`07/18/00
`11/16/99
`12/17/97
`08/17/99
`09/07/99
`01/16/01
`07/22/03
`11/23/99
`08/14/01
`10/05/99
`11/09/99
`04/26/05
`01/02/01
`01/02/01
`10/30/00
`11/14/00
`02/01/00
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 13 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Item No.
`68.
`69.
`70.
`71.
`72.
`73.
`74.
`75.
`76.
`77.
`78.
`79.
`80.
`81.
`82.
`83.
`84.
`85.
`86.
`87.
`88.
`89.
`90.
`91.
`92.
`93.
`94.
`95.
`96.
`97.
`98.
`99.
`100.
`101.
`102.
`103.
`104.
`105.
`106.
`107.
`108.
`
`109.
`110.
`
`Patent No.
`U.S. 6,275,937
`U.S. 6,253,370
`U.S. 6,622,247
`U.S. 6,088,803
`WO9831124
`U.S. 5,987,610
`WO9840993
`WO9916225
`U.S. 6,073,175
`U.S. 6,058,482
`U.S. 6,205,551
`U.S. 6,339,829
`EP0909072
`EP0909075
`U.S. 6,266,664
`U.S. 6,691,230
`U.S.6,336,140
`U.S.6,449,723
`U.S. 5,832,208
`U.S.6,772,332
`U.S. 6,487,666
`U.S. 5,864,683
`U.S. 6,519,679
`U.S. 6,604,143
`U.S. 6,425,058
`U.S. 6,434,668
`U.S. 6,434,669
`U.S. 6,772,225
`U.S. 6,732,179
`U.S. 6,272,641
`U.S. 6,725,424
`U.S. 6,829,746
`U.S. 7,076,650
`U.S. 6,704,798
`JP 01-256045 A
`U.S. 6,480,962
`U.S. 6,772,214
`U.S. 6,917,960
`EP 1 058 199 A2
`U.S. 6,832,222
`WO 01/25882
`WO 01/22682 A2
`JP2002183019
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`TABLE 1
`Country of
`Origin
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Israel
`Israel
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Japan
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Great
`Britain
`U.S.A.
`Japan
`
`-11-
`
`Filing Date
`11/26/97
`12/01/97
`12/19/97
`12/30/97
`01/06/98
`02/12/98
`02/23/98
`02/23/98
`04/27/98
`05/22/98
`06/29/98
`07/30/98
`09/01/98
`09/01/98
`10/01/98
`10/15/98
`10/30/98
`10/30/98
`09/05/96
`12/23/98
`01/15/99
`01/26/99
`06/11/99
`06/18/99
`09/07/99
`09/07/99
`09/07/99
`09/30/99
`10/26/99
`11/09/99
`12/09/99
`12/09/99
`12/24/99
`02/08/00
`03/14/00
`04/18/00
`04/27/00
`05/05/00
`05/19/00
`06/23/00
`09/21/00
`09/22/00
`12/14/00
`
`Issue Date
`08/14/01
`06/26/01
`09/16/03
`07/11/00
`07/16/98
`11/16/99
`09/17/98
`04/01/99
`06/06/00
`05/02/00
`03/20/01
`01/15/02
`04/14/99
`04/14/99
`07/24/01
`02/10/04
`01/01/02
`09/10/02
`11/03/98
`08/03/04
`11/26/02
`01/26/99
`02/11/03
`08/05/03
`07/23/02
`08/13/02
`08/13/02
`08/03/04
`05/04/04
`08/07/01
`04/20/04
`12/07/04
`07/11/06
`03/09/04
`09/21/01
`11/12/02
`08/03/04
`07/12/05
`12/06/00
`12/14/04
`04/12/01
`03/29/01
`06/20/02
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 14 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Item No.
`111.
`112.
`113.
`114.
`115.
`116.
`117.
`
`118.
`119.
`120.
`
`121.
`122.
`123.
`124.
`125.
`126.
`127.
`128.
`129.
`130.
`131.
`132.
`133.
`134.
`135.
`136.
`137.
`138.
`139.
`140.
`141.
`142.
`143.
`144.
`145.
`146.
`147.
`148.
`149.
`150.
`151.
`152.
`
`Patent No.
`U.S. 6,640,284
`EP1119151
`U.S. 6,981,138
`U.S. 7,210,041
`JP 02-358253 A
`JP 02-358229
`JP 02-358229
`Translation
`JP2002373108
`WO 0199374
`WO 0198907
`
`WO 0213479
`U.S. 7,103,714
`U.S. 7,761,594
`U.S. 7,660,902
`JP2003177991
`U.S. 6,917,953
`U.S. 7,761,605
`U.S. 7,051,164
`U.S. 7,461,262
`U.S. 8,374,958
`U.S. 7,363,361
`U.S. 7,567,800
`U.S. 8,364,951
`U.S. 7,343,604
`U.S. 6,157,721
`U.S. 5,958,050
`U.S. 5,987,123
`U.S. 5,978,484
`U.S. 6,092,194
`U.S. 8,347,392
`U.S. 7,487,540
`U.S. 7,694,328
`U.S. 8,244,910
`U.S. 8,522,350
`U.S. 6,065,118
`U.S. 7,594,267
`U.S. 6,253,370
`U.S. 5,398,196
`U.S. 5,951,698
`U.S. 5,485,575
`U.S. 5,504,921
`U.S. 5,412,717
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`TABLE 1
`Country of
`Origin
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Japan
`Japan
`Japan
`Japan
`U.S.A.
`Great
`Britain
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`Japan
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`
`-12-
`
`Filing Date
`12/21/00
`01/08/01
`03/26/01
`04/30/01
`05/31/01
`06/04/01
`06/04/01
`06/14/01
`06/21/01
`06/22/01
`
`08/03/01
`08/04/01
`10/15/01
`11/20/01
`12/12/01
`12/17/01
`12/20/01
`12/27/01
`03/19/02
`08/29/02
`09/03/02
`11/12/02
`12/30/02
`07/25/03
`08/12/96
`12/26/96
`07/03/96
`04/25/96
`11/06/97
`08/25/06
`01/19/04
`10/21/04
`07/14/04
`11/19/09
`09/24/96
`06/14/02
`12/01/97
`07/29/93
`10/02/96
`11/21/94
`05/16/94
`05/15/92
`
`Issue Date
`10/28/03
`07/25/01
`12/27/05
`04/24/07
`12/13/02
`12/13/02
`12/13/02
`12/26/02
`12/27/01
`12/27/01
`
`02/14/02
`09/05/06
`07/20/10
`02/09/10
`06/27/03
`07/12/05
`07/20/10
`05/23/06
`12/02/08
`02/12/13
`04/22/08
`07/28/09
`01/29/13
`03/11/08
`12/05/00
`09/28/99
`11/16/99
`11/02/99
`07/18/00
`01/01/13
`02/03/09
`04/06/10
`08/14/12
`08/27/13
`05/16/00
`09/22/09
`06/26/01
`03/14/95
`09/14/99
`01/16/96
`04/02/96
`05/02/95
`
`QUALYS’S PATENT L.R. 3-3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 144-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 15 of 97
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Item No.
`153.
`154.
`155.
`156.
`157.
`158.
`159.
`160.
`161.
`162.
`
`Patent No.
`U.S. 5,574,927
`U.S. 5,842,002
`U.S. 8,839,417
`U.S. 7,398,553
`U.S. 7,636,945
`U.S. 5,987,611
`U.S. 6,473,896
`U.S. 8,516,588
`U.S. 6,772,347
`U.S. 6,141,749
`
`TABLE 1
`Country of
`Origin
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`U.S.A.
`
`Filing Date
`03/25/94
`05/30/97
`11/17/04
`10/29/01
`07/14/01
`05/06/97
`10/06/99
`05/02/02
`03/15/00
`09/12/97
`
`B.
`
`Prior Art P