throbber
Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 125 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`QUALYS INC.’S REQUEST FOR
`JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT
`OF ITS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
`ON THE PLEADINGS
`
`)))))))))))
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`QUALYS’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 125 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, Defendant Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) respectfully
`asks that the Court take judicial notice of the following public and/or litigation documents listed
`below. Each document identified below is appropriate for judicial notice.1
`The specific documents subject to this Request are:
`Exhibit A: a true and correct copy of excerpts of the file history of U.S. Patent No.
`7,975,305. This document is publicly available from the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and contains the public record of the application
`process for the ’305 Patent.
`Exhibit B: a true and correct copy of excerpts of the proceedings for Ex Parte
`Reexamination No. 90/013,660 proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 7,975,305. This
`document is publicly available from the USPTO and contains the public record of
`those proceedings.
`Exhibit C: a true and correct copy of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal’s Judgment
`in Case No. 2018-2354 pertaining to Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/013,660.
`Exhibit D: a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,987,611 (issued Nov. 16,
`1999) (“Freund”). This document is publicly available from the USPTO and is
`discussed in the file history for the ’305 Patent that is Exhibit A.
`Exhibit E: is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,140,660 (issued March 20,
`2012) (“Wells”). This document is publicly available from the USPTO and is
`discussed in the proceedings for Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/013,660 that is
`Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. ADP, LLC, 772 Fed. Appx. 890, 898 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (taking judicial
`notice of the patentee’s prosecution history); Coinstar. Inc. v. Coinbank Automated Sys., Inc., 998
`F.Supp. 1109, 1114 (N.D. Cal. 1998); Marine Polymer Tech., Inc. v. HemCon, Inc., 659 F.3d 1084,
`1090 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (taking judicial notice of a reexamination proceeding); St. Clair Intellectual
`Prop. Consultants, Inc. v. Canon Inc., 2011 WL 66166, *5 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (nonprecedential)
`(noting that the court could take judicial notice of the prosecution history of a reexamination);
`Hoganas AB v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 9 F.3d 948, 954 n.27, 28 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (taking judicial notice
`of another patent); Coinstar, Inc. v. Coinbank Automated Sys., Inc., 998 F.Supp. 1109, 1114 (N.D.
`Cal. 1998) (taking judicial notice of two patents); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at
`Harbor-UCLA Medical Center v. Eli Lilly and Co., 849 F.3d 1049, 1061 n.6 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (taking
`judicial notice a patentee’s infringement contentions).
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`-1-
`
`QUALYS’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 125 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`D.I. 100-11, previously filed in this matter, is a true and correct copy of Finjan’s
`Initial Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, served April 19,
`2019.
`
`DATED: October 22, 2020
`
`By:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Christopher D. Mays
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR (TSH)
`
`-2-
`
`QUALYS’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket