Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar
`No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`Date Complaint Filed: November 29, 2018
`
`Trial Date: None Set
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 2 of 6
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and Defendant
`
`Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) (collectively, “the Parties”), hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request
`
`that the Court amend the case schedule.
`
`In support of these stipulated requests, the Parties jointly state as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the daily business operations of both
`
`parties and their respective counsel;
`
`WHEREAS, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the parties have conferred and agreed that,
`
`subject to the Court’s approval, the case schedule should be amended as set forth below in order to
`
`account for the uncertainties surrounding the pandemic and to provide for the orderly conclusion of
`
`fact discovery;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among counsel
`
`for Finjan and Qualys that the deadlines set forth below be amended as follows:
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`1
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`Event
`
`Previous Date
`
`Close of fact discovery
`
`Opening expert reports
`
`Rebuttal expert reports
`
`Close of expert discovery
`
`Last day for a pre-filing
`conference on summary
`judgment motions
`Plaintiff’s opening summary
`judgment briefs
`
`Defendant’s opposition summary
`judgment briefs and cross motion
`for summary judgment
`Plaintiff’s reply summary
`judgment briefs and opposition to
`Defendant’s cross motion for
`summary judgment
`Defendant’s reply for its cross
`motion for summary judgment
`
`Summary judgment hearing
`
`Final Pretrial Conference
`
`2 months after the claim
`construction order
`(August 11, 2020)
`2 months after the close of
`fact discovery
`6 weeks after service of
`opening expert reports
`1 month after the service
`of rebuttal expert reports
`three weeks after the close
`of expert discovery
`
`three weeks after the pre-
`filing conference on
`summary judgment
`motions
`three weeks after
`Plaintiff’s opening
`summary judgment brief
`three weeks after
`Defendant’s opposition
`summary judgment brief
`
`three weeks after
`Plaintiff’s opposition
`summary judgment brief
`Subject to the Court’s
`availability
`Subject to the Court’s
`availability
`
`Agreed Proposed
`Date/Deadline
`October 1, 2020
`
`No change (December 1, 2020)
`
`No change (January 12, 2021)
`
`No change (February 12, 2021)
`
`No change (March 5, 2021)
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`No change1
`
`No change2
`
`1 Finjan proposes the Summary Judgment Hearing be scheduled for June 29, 2021 (if a hearing is
`necessary), subject to the Court’s availability. Qualys is of the view that scheduling a hearing at this
`juncture is premature at least until the Court holds its post-claim construction CMC. See Standing
`Order for Patent Cases, ¶ 4.
`2 Finjan proposes the Final Pretrial Conference be scheduled for July 30, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., subject to
`the Court’s availability. Qualys is of the view that scheduling a final pretrial conference at this
`juncture is premature. Further, in Qualys’ view, scheduling the pretrial conference within 4 weeks of
`2
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`Event
`
`Trial
`
`Previous Date
`
`Subject to the Court’s
`availability
`
`Agreed Proposed
`Date/Deadline
`No change3
`
`DATED: June 25, 2020
`
`DATED: June 25, 2020
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens (State Bar No. 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`/s/ Ryan Smith
`By:
`Ryan Smith (State Bar No. 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH
`& ROSATI, P.C.
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`the summary judgment hearing would not afford sufficient time to account for the Court’s summary
`judgment order.
`3 Finjan proposes Trial be scheduled to begin August 16, 2021 at 8:00 a.m., subject to the Court’s
`availability. Qualys disagrees for the same reasons as expressed above.
`3
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
` /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`4
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 78 Filed 06/30/20 Page 6 of 6
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the deadlines set forth below are
`
`extended as follows:
`
`Event
`Close of fact discovery
`
`Amended Deadline
`October 1, 2020
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: ______________
`
`___________________________
`Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`United States District Court Judge
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`
`5
`
`CASE NO: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`June 30, 2020
`
`