Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`vs.
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case Number: 4:18-cv-06185-HSG
`(Former Case No. 2:17-cv-00517-JRG) (E.D.
`Tex.)
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND
`SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 73) AND
`EXTEND ADR DEADLINE (DKT. 56)
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`1
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`(As Modified)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING
`
`ORDER AND EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and
`
`the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) and the Order re: ADR Deadline (Dkt. 56), Plaintiff ZTE
`
`(USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”)
`
`(collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on April 4, 2019, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete
`
`mediation, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend the ADR deadline from April 17,
`
`2019 to June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling
`
`Order (Dkt. 63), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on May 17, 2019, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties’
`
`discovery disputes, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend Plaintiff’s Invalidity
`
`Contentions and Plaintiff’s Production from May 20, 2019 to June 3, 2019; and the Court
`
`granted the Parties’ request to extend the Parties’ Exchange of Proposed Claim terms from June
`
`3, 2019 to June 10, 2019;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the parties were scheduled to conduct mediation on June 4, 2019 with Hon.
`
`James Ware (Ret.) as mediator, however, due to a medical emergency of mediator, the Parties
`
`were unable to complete mediation on that date;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the next available date for both Parties and the mediator is in August 2019,
`
`which is after the current June 21, 2019 ADR mediation deadline;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete the rescheduled
`
`mediation, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the ADR deadline to August
`
`23, 2019;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on June 14, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in Magistrate Judge
`
`Spero’s courtroom to discuss certain discovery disputes;
`
`1
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to resolve such discovery disputes as agreed
`
`during the meet and confer, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the
`
`discovery deadlines as described below;
`
`
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and
`
`Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the upcoming deadlines set forth in
`
`the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) be modified as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`Damages Contentions
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations
`in Support of Claim
`Construction, if Any
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Submit Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`
`
`Previous Dates
`
`June 24, 2019
`
`July 1, 2019
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 3, 2019
`
`Amended Dates
`
`August 2, 2019
`
`August 9, 2019
`August 13, 2019
`
`August 13, 2019
`
`July 29, 2019
`
`September 6, 2019
`
`August 5, 2019
`
`September 13, 2019
`
`August 20, 2019
`
`September 30, 2019
`
`September 3, 2019
`
`October 14, 2019
`
`September 10, 2019
`
`October 21, 2019
`
`October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m. November 12, 2019; 1:00
`p.m.
`
`IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff
`
`and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the deadline to complete ADR,
`
`currently set for June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56), shall be continued to August 23, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 19, 2019
`
`Dated: June 19, 2019
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Liu Su
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Sarah G. Hartman
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`
`3
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`I, Michael Liu Su, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
`
`obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this e-
`
`filed document.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Liu Su
`Michael Liu Su
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
`
`
`
`Dated: ___________________
`
`
`__________________________________
`The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
`U.S. District Court Judge
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`except the
`
`claim construction hearing will be held on November 20, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.
`
`6/21/2019
`
`