throbber
Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 73 Filed 05/17/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) INC.
`
`
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`vs.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`
`
`
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`Case Number: 4:18-cv-06185-HSG
`(Former Case No. 2:17-cv-00517-JRG) (E.D.
`Tex.)
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT.
`63)
`
`
`))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 63)
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 73 Filed 05/17/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the
`
`Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 63), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) and Defendant AGIS
`Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and
`agree as follows:
`WHEREAS, on April 4, 2019, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete mediation,
`
`the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend the ADR deadline from April 17, 2019 to June 21,
`2019 (Dkt. 56);
`WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered the Scheduling Order (Dkt.
`
`63), which modified the previous Scheduling Order and set the following forthcoming deadlines:
`
`
`Event
`Plaintiff’s Invalidity Contentions
`Plaintiff’s Production
`Exchange Proposed Claim Terms
`Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`Damages Contentions
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations in
`Support of Claim Construction,
`if Any
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Submit Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Dates
`May 20, 2019
`May 20, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`June 24, 2019
`
`July 1, 2019
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 29, 2019
`
`August 5, 2019
`
`August 20, 2019
`
`September 3, 2019
`
`September 10, 2019
`
`October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
`
`
`WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties’ discovery disputes, the
`
`Parties have agreed that good cause exists for a two-week extension of the May 20, 2019 deadline
`above and for a one-week extension of the June 3, 2019 deadline above;
`
`WHEREAS, these two extensions would not affect any other aspect of the above schedule;
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`1
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 63)
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 73 Filed 05/17/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
`
`through their respective undersigned counsel, that the upcoming deadlines set forth in the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 63) be modified as follows:
`
`
`
`Event
`Plaintiff’s Invalidity Contentions
`Plaintiff’s Production
`Exchange Proposed Claim
`Terms
`Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`Damages Contentions
`
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations in
`Support of Claim Construction,
`if Any
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Submit Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`
`
`
`
`Previous Dates
`May 20, 2019
`May 20, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`
`Amended Dates
`June 3, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`June 10, 2019
`
`June 24, 2019
`
`July 1, 2019
`
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 3, 2019
`
`June 24, 2019
`(same)
`
`July 1, 2019
`(same)
`July 3, 2019
`(same)
`July 3, 2019
`(same)
`
`July 29, 2019
`
`August 5, 2019
`
`August 20, 2019
`
`September 3, 2019
`
`September 10, 2019
`
`October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
`
`July 29, 2019
`(same)
`August 5, 2019
`(same)
`August 20, 2019
`(same)
`September 3, 2019
`(same)
`September 10, 2019
`(same)
`October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
`(same)
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`
`Dated: May 16, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Liu Su
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 63)
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 73 Filed 05/17/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) INC.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Sarah G. Hartman
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`3
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 63)
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`Dated: May 16, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 73 Filed 05/17/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`I, Michael Liu Su, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
`obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this e-filed
`document.
`
`
`/s/ Michael Liu Su
`Michael Liu Su
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
`
`
`Dated: May 17, 2019
`
`_______________________________________
`The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
`U.S. District Court Judge
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 63)
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket