Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 1 of 6
`
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`Alessandra C. Messing (pro hac vice)
`amessing@brownrudnick.com
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Samhitha M. Medatia (pro hac vice)
`Samhitha.medatia@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`271 17th Street, NW
`Suite 1400
`Atlanta, GA 30363
`Telephone:
`(404) 653-6400
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case Number: 4:18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`ORDER TO AMEND
`SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 99)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 2 of 6
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING
`
`ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and
`
`the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) and Defendant AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate
`
`and agree as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling
`
`Order (Dkt. 63), which modified the initial Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25);
`
`WHEREAS, on May 17, 2019, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties’
`
`discovery disputes, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend the deadline for Plaintiff’s
`
`Invalidity Contentions and Production from May 20, 2019 to June 3, 2019, and extend the
`
`Parties’ Exchange of Proposed Claim terms from June 3, 2019 to June 10, 2019 (Dkt. 73);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on June 14, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in Magistrate Judge
`
`Spero’s courtroom to discuss certain discovery disputes;
`
`WHEREAS, on June 21, 2019, to allow the Parties sufficient time to resolve their
`
`discovery disputes as agreed during the June 14, 2019 conference, the Court signed and entered
`
`an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 92), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt.
`
`73);
`
`WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, to allow the Parties additional time to confer regarding
`
`the on-going discovery disputes and the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement; the
`
`Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99), which modified the previous
`
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. 92);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on August 6, 2019, ZTE requested an in-person meeting of lead counsel to
`
`discuss certain discovery disputes, pursuant to Magistrate Judge Spero’s Standing Order ¶ 15 and
`
`Dkt. 81 at 2;
`
`WHEREAS, on August 15, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in-person, pursuant to
`
`ZTE’s request and Magistrate Judge Spero’s Standing Order and Dkt. 81. AGIS Software agreed
`
`1
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 3 of 6
`
`to produce two deposition transcripts, and the Parties agreed to permit an exchange of amended
`
`Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4-2 by
`
`August 23, 2019.1 The Parties further agreed that AGIS Software would serve amended
`
`Infringement Contentions to reflect the Parties’ agreements by September 3, 2019, and that ZTE
`
`would serve amended Invalidity Contentions within 21 days of receipt of AGIS Software’s
`
`amended Infringement Contentions, by September 24, 2019.2
`
`WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to resolve their discovery disputes as agreed
`
`during the August 15, 2019 conference, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend
`
`the discovery deadlines as described below;3
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and
`
`Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that AGIS Software will serve
`
`amended Infringement Contentions by September 3, 2019; ZTE will serve amended Invalidity
`
`Contentions by September 24, 2019; the Parties will exchange amended Preliminary Claim
`
`Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence by August 23, 2019; and the following upcoming
`
`deadlines set forth in Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99) be modified as follows:
`
`Event
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations
`in Support of Claim
`Construction, if Any
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Submit Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`
`Previous Deadlines
`August 21, 2019
`
`Amended Deadlines
`September 6, 2019
`
`August 21, 2019
`
`September 6, 2019
`
`September 13, 2019
`
`September 23, 2019
`
`September 13, 2019
`(same)
`October 7, 2019
`
`October 7, 2019
`
`October 21, 2019
`
`1 AGIS Software produced the two deposition transcripts to ZTE on August 16, 2019.
`2 The Parties intend to file a Joint Letter to the Court summarizing the agreements made at the
`conference by August 20, 2019, as required by Magistrate Judge Spero’s Order (Dkt. 81).
`3 The Parties note that, as Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 41) is still pending, Defendant
`AGIS Software has not yet filed an answer to Plaintiff ZTE’s complaint or alleged infringement
`against ZTE. The Parties are nonetheless proceeding in order to comply with the deadlines set
`forth in the Court’s scheduling orders.
`
`2
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 4 of 6
`
`Submit Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`
`Submit Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`October 21, 2019
`
`November 4, 2019
`
`October 28, 2019
`
`November 11, 2019
`
`December 4, 2019; 1:00
`p.m.
`
`December 18, 2019; 1:00
`p.m.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`Dated: August 20, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Bradford C. Schulz
`Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Samhitha M. Medatia (pro hac vice)
`Samhitha.medatia@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`271 17th Street, NW
`Suite 1400
`Atlanta, GA 30363
`Telephone:
`(404) 653-6400
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`3
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 5 of 6
`
`Dated: August 20, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Alessandra C. Messing
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing (pro hac vice)
`amessing@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`4
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 102 Filed 08/21/19 Page 6 of 6
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`I, Bradford C. Schulz, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
`
`obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this e-
`
`filed document.
`
`/s/ Bradford C. Schulz
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
`
`Dated:8/21/2019
`
`_______________________________________
`The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
`U.S. District Court Judge
`Northern District of California
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`5
`JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, CASE NO.
`18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`