throbber
Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 264-1 Filed 03/27/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`CLEMENT ROBERTS (SBN: 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone:
`(415) 773-5700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 773-5759
`
`VICKIE FEEMAN (SBN: 177487)
`vfeeman@orrick.com
`EVAN BREWER (SBN: 304411)
`ebrewer@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Telephone:
`+1 650 614 7400
`Facsimile:
`+1 650 614 7401
`
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (SBN: 260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`MARGARET ABERNATHY (SBN: 300273)
`mabernathy@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 629-2020
`Facsimile: (213) 612-2499
`Attorneys for Defendants
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC. a Delaware Corporation,
`Case No. 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`DECLARATION OF ALYSSA CARIDIS
`Plaintiff,
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
`OPPOSITION TO FINJAN’S MOTION
`TO CERTIFY THE COURT’S JANUARY
`17, 2020 ORDER FOR
`INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, TO STAY,
`AND TO PERMIT LIMITED
`DISCOVERY
`Date:
`April 22, 2020
`Time:
`2:00 p.m.
`Location: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor
`Judge:
`Hon. William H. Orrick
`Complaint filed: May 3, 2018
`
`
`v.
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Delaware
`Corporation, CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES LTD., an Israeli Limited
`Company,
`
`Defendants.
`
`CARIDIS DECL. ISO DEFS’ MOT. TO
`STRIKE SECOND AMD. ICS
`3:18-CV-02621-WHO
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 264-1 Filed 03/27/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`I, Alyssa Caridis, declare as follows and would so testify under oath if called upon to do
`
`so:
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, counsel of
`1.
`record for Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software
`Technologies, Ltd. (collectively, “Check Point”) in the above-captioned matter. I am a member in
`good standing of the Bar of the State of California. I make this declaration based on my personal
`knowledge, unless otherwise noted. If called, I can and will testify competently to the matter set
`forth herein. I submit this declaration in support of Check Point’s Opposition to Finjan’s Motion
`to Certify the Court’s January 17, 2020 Order for Interlocutory Appeal, to Stay, and to Permit
`Limited Discovery.
`A true and correct copy of a letter from C. Roberts to P. Andre, dated July 25,
`2.
`2018 is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`A true and correct copy of the Check Point’s Second Set of Interrogatories to
`3.
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. served on August 27, 2018 is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`A true and correct copy of a Transcript of Proceedings held on February 13, 2019
`4.
`in the above-captioned case is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`A true and correct copy of an email from A. Caridis to J. Hannah et al., dated April
`5.
`5, 2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
`A true and correct copy of an email from K. Kastens to A. Caridis et al., dated
`6.
`April 8, 2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
`A true and correct copy of a Transcript of Proceedings held on December 4, 2019
`7.
`in the above-captioned case is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
`A true and correct copy of an email from E. Brewer to L. Xu, dated March 24,
`8.
`2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit G.
`A true and correct copy of the Finjan’s Responses and Objections to Check Point’s
`9.
`Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 4) served on September 26, 2018 is attached hereto as Exhibit
`H.
`
`10.
`
`A true and correct copy of an email from A. Manes to R. Clement et al., dated
`CARIDIS DECL. ISO DEFS’ MOT. TO
`STRIKE SECOND AMD. ICS
`3:18-CV-02621-WHO
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 264-1 Filed 03/27/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`September 20, 2018 is attached hereto as Exhibit I.
`A true and correct copy of an email from R. Clement to L. Xu et al., dated
`11.
`September 4, 2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit J.
`A true and correct copy of a Transcript of Proceedings held on July 10, 2019 is
`12.
`attached hereto as Exhibit K.
`A true and correct copy of an email from V. Feeman to L. Xu et al, dated
`13.
`September 20, 2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit L.
`A true and correct copy of an email from E. Brewer to L. Xu, dated October 1,
`14.
`2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit M.
`A true and correct copy of an email from L. Xu to E. Brewer, dated October 10,
`15.
`2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit N.
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
`knowledge. Executed this 27th day of March, 2020 in Los Angeles, California.
`
`
` /s/ Alyssa Caridis
`ALYSSA CARIDIS
`
`- 2 -
`
`CARIDIS DECL. ISO DEFS’ MOT. TO
`STRIKE SECOND AMD. ICS
`3:18-CV-02621-WHO
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket