throbber
Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER B. KASTENS (State Bar No.
`254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL
`LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`CLEMENT ROBERTS (State Bar No. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
` Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`VICKIE FEEMAN (State Bar No. 177487)
`vfeeman@orrick.com
`EVAN BREWER (State Bar No. 304411)
`ebrewer@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Telephone: (650) 614 7400
`Facsimile: (650) 614 7401
`
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (State Bar No. 260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`MARGARET ABERNATHY (State Bar No.
`300273)
`mabernathy@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 629-2020
`Facsimile: (213) 612-2499
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and CHECK POINT
`SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 3:18-cv-02621-WHO (JCS)
`JOINT MOTION, STIPULATION AND
`ORDER EXTENDING
`CASE DEADLINES
`
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation and CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., an Israeli Limited
`Company
`
`Defendants.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 6
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and
`
`Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Technologies, Ltd.
`
`(collectively, “Check Point”) jointly request the Court to modify the case schedule as set forth in
`
`this stipulation.
`
`WHEREAS, on January 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order regarding Check Point’s
`
`Motion to Strike Finjan’s Infringement Contentions (Dkt. No. 247) and a Notice of Intent to
`
`Appoint Master Under Rule 53 to resolve certain disputes regarding Finjan’s Infringement
`
`Contentions (Dkt. No. 248).
`
`WHEREAS, Finjan and Check Point have agreed that the scope of the case may be
`
`impacted based on the pending resolution of disputes before the special master. As a result, Finjan
`
`and Check Point have agreed to extend certain claim construction deadlines. The proposed
`
`extensions below, will not have a material effect on the remainder of this case.
`
`WHEREAS, the Court previously modified the schedule in this case eleven (11) times: (i)
`
`to adjust the briefing schedule for Finjan’s Motion to Impute Service, Dkt. No. 35; (ii) to extend
`
`the hearing date on Finjan’s Motion to Impute Service by seven days, Dkt. No. 42; (iii) to adjust
`
`the briefing schedule and hearing on Finjan’s Motion to Strike and extend Check Point’s time to
`
`respond to the complaint, Dkt. No. 52; (iv) to extend Check Point’s time to file a Reply in support
`
`of its Motion to Enforce Order and Strike Infringement Contentions, Dkt. No. 64; (v) to extend
`
`Finjan’s time to respond to Check Point’s affirmative defenses, Dkt. No. 82; (vi) to grant Check
`
`Point’s motion to modify the claim construction schedule, Dkt. No. 84; (vii) to grant Check Point’s
`
`motion to continue to change the claim construction schedule, Dkt. No. 108; (viii) to grant the
`
`parties’ stipulation for Finjan to file its opposition to Check Point’s Motion to Amend Invalidity
`
`Contentions, Dkt. No. 149; (ix) to grant the parties’ stipulation to change the parties’ briefing
`
`schedule related to Check Point’s Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions, Dkt. No. 227; (x) to
`
`grant the parties’ stipulation to an extended case schedule following the Court’s mandated meet-
`
`and-confer, Dkt. Nos. 236, 238; and (xi) to grant the parties’ stipulation to extend certain claim
`
`construction deadlines, Dkt. No. 246.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to modify case
`
`schedule as follows:
`Item
`
`Exchange Proposed Terms for
`Construction
`Exchange of Preliminary Claim
`Constructions
`Joint Claim Construction &
`Prehearing Statement
`Completion of Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Defendant’s Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction
`Brief
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`
`
`
`
`Original Dates
`
`Stipulated Dates
`
`1/24/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/7/2020
`
`1/31/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/14/2020
`
`2/7/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/21/2020
`
`2/14/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/28/2020
`
`2/17/2020 (Dkt. No. 238)
`
`3/2/2020
`
`3/2/2020 (Dkt. No. 238)
`
`3/16/2020
`
`3/9/2020 (Dkt. No. 239)
`Tutorial: 3/30/2020 (10 a.m.)
`Hearing: 4/3/2020 (10 a.m.)
`
`(Dkt No. 238)
`
`3/23/2020
`
`No change
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`Dated: January 24, 2020
`
`
`
`Dated: January 24, 2020
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and CHECK POINT
`SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
`3
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
`James Hannah (SBN 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (SBN 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Clement Roberts
`Vickie Feeman (SBN 177487)
`Evan Brewer (SBN 304411)
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON
`& SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`vfeeman@orrick.com
`fcheever@orrick.com
`ebrewer@orrick.com
`
`Clement Roberts
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON
`& SUTCLIFFE LLP
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`croberts@orrick.com
`
`Alyssa Caridis
`Margaret Anne Abernathy
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON
`& SUTCLIFFE LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`acaridis@orrick.com
`mabernathy@orrick.com
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`I, Kristopher Kastens, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being
`
`used in this filing. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all other
`
`signatories to this document have concurred in the filing of this document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 253 Filed 01/24/20 Page 6 of 6
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation in part, the case schedule is modified as follows:
`Original Dates
`Stipulated Dates
`
`Item
`
`ORDER
`
`Exchange Proposed Terms for
`Construction
`Exchange of Preliminary Claim
`Constructions
`Joint Claim Construction &
`Prehearing Statement
`Completion of Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Defendant’s Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction
`Brief
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`1/24/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/7/2020
`
`1/31/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/14/2020
`
`2/7/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/21/2020
`
`2/14/2020 (Dkt. No. 246)
`
`2/28/2020
`
`2/17/2020 (Dkt. No. 238)
`
`3/2/2020
`
`3/2/2020 (Dkt. No. 238)
`
`3/16/2020
`
`3/9/2020 (Dkt. No. 239)
`Tutorial: 3/30/2020 (10 a.m.)
`Hearing: 4/3/2020 (10 a.m.)
`
`(Dkt No. 238)
`
`3/23/2020
`
`Tutorial: 4/3/2020
`Hearing : 4/10/2020
`(both at 10 a.m.)
`
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 24, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable William H. Orrick
`United Stated District Judge
`
`
`
`5
`JOINT MOTION, STIP. AND ORDER CASE NO.: 18-cv-02621-WHO
`RE MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket