`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FISHER-PRICE, INC. and
`MATTEL, INC.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`DYNACRAFY BSC, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 17-CV-03745-PJH
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
`DEFENDANT DYNACRAFT’S
`MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION
`PENDING INTER-PARTES REVIEW
`AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM
`OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
` Case No. 17-CV-03745-PJH
`
`
`
`Case 4:17-cv-03745-PJH Document 44-1 Filed 10/10/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`Now Before the Court is Dynacraft’s Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter-partes
`
`Review and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities. The Court, having fully
`
`considered the parties’ briefs and arguments, grants Dynacraft’s motion.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: _____________
`
` _______________________________
` Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
` CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`2
`
` Case No. 17-cv-03745-PJH
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`