`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`450 Golden Gate Ave.
`San Francisco, CA
`___________________
`www.cand.uscourts.gov
`
`Susan Y. Soong
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`
`
`GENERAL COURT NUMBER
`415-522-2000
`
`July 11, 2017
`
`
`Fisher-Price, Inc., et al. v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
`Case Number: 17-cv-03745-LB
`
`Karen L. Pascale
`Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`Re:
`
`
`Dear Counsel/Parties:
`
`This matter has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for all
`purposes including trial.
`
`
`The magistrate judges of this district have been designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a
`civil case including a jury or nonjury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment, upon the consent
`of all parties.
`
`
`A review of our records discloses that the Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate
`Judge or Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United
`States District Judge has not been filed in this case. All parties are asked to complete the attached
`form documenting either consent or request for reassignment and e-file it with the Court by July 21,
`2017. This form can be found on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Please note that any
`party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive
`consequences.
`
`
`Susan Y. Soong
`Clerk, United States District Court
`
`
`________________________
`Angella Meuleman, Deputy Clerk to the
`Honorable LAUREL BEELER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:17-cv-03745-PJH Document 20 Filed 07/11/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FISHER-PRICE, INC., ET AL.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`DYNACRAFT BSC, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-03745-LB
`
`
`CONSENT OR DECLINATION
`TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`JURISDICTION
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if
`you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to
`consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection.
`
`( ) Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction
`
`In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a
`United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and
`entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
`
`
`
`( ) Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction
`
`In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States
`magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be
`reassigned to a United States district judge.
`
`DATE: ________________
`
`OR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NAME:
`COUNSEL FOR
`(OR “PRO SE”):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Signature
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
