`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 12-cv-05404-YGR
`
`
`
`ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS;
`SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`ZACK WARD, ET AL.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 57
`
`
`
`
`
`On September 15, 2015, defendant moved to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 57.) Oral argument on the opposed motion was heard on December
`
`14, 2015. The Court finds that defendant’s argument relies on an accompanying request for
`
`judicial notice (Dkt. No. 58) of certain evidence that is not appropriate for consideration on a
`
`motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. As the motion is inextricably linked to the overbroad
`
`request for judicial notice, the motion is DENIED.
`
`However, the Court will entertain a narrow motion for summary judgment by defendant
`
`solely on the issue of whether the complaint alleges a relevant market. The motion shall be filed
`
`no later than February 2, 2016, on a standard 35-day schedule. While the pre-filing conference
`
`requirement is waived, the parties must otherwise follow the Court’s Standing Order in Civil
`
`Cases, including by submitting separate statements of material facts. In furtherance of addressing
`
`the merits of the anticipated motion, plaintiffs shall each submit to defendant by no later than
`
`January 8, 2016, declarations describing in detail the circumstances surrounding their purchases
`
`of the iPhones and AT&T service plans in question, including whether the devices were acquired
`
`separately from, and prior to, the service plans.
`
`This Order terminates Docket Number 57.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court