`Case4:11—cv—OO597—CW Document25 Fi|edO5/24/11 Page1of2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SANDISK CORPORATION.
`
`PlaintilT(s),
`
`CASE NO, CV ll—00S97 CW
`
`v.
`MOBILE MEDIA IDEAS LLC,
`
`STIPULATION AND [
`ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
`
`Defendant(s).
`I
`
`Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
`following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R.
`l6«8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
`
`The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
`
`Court Processes:
`
`Non—binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
`Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
`(ADR L.R. 5)
`Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
`
`(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement cu/1/eI'cIice with (I Magi.s'tI'ate Judge is
`appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any utherfornr my/‘ADR, must participate in an
`ADR phone cmi/'erence and may not/ile I/71.5’./t).l"lni They muxl insteacle/ile a Nutice Q/"Neat/for
`ADR Phone Cm;/‘er-emu See Civil Local Rule /6-8 andADR LR. 3-5)
`
`Private Process:
`Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private Mediation by JAMS
`
`I
`
`The parties agree to hold the ADR session by
`the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the dat fI e order
`
`referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordere
`
`/
`
`other requested deadline Within 90 days from the issuance of
`
`nslru tion order.
`
`
`
`Dated; May I9, 20::
`
`Dated: Maj loll Z0”
`
`/’
`
`
`/2
`
`or
`
`Attorne
`
`
`
`
`
`Case4:11-cv-00597-CW Document25 Filed05/24/11 Page2 of 2
`
`To be held by 12/31/2011.
`
`5/24/2011