throbber
Case 3:22-cv-03199-JD Document 86 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`Lewis Emery Hudnell III (CA SBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CA SBN 189452)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP
`800 W. El Camino Real, Suite 180
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`Telephone: (650) 564-3698
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`Matthias A. Kamber (SB # 232147)
`matthiaskamber@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`101 California Street, 48th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 856-7000
`Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
`
`Robert W. Unikel (pro hac vice)
`robertunikel@paulhastings.com
`John A. Cotiguala (pro hac vice)
`johncotiguala@paulhastings.com
`Matthew R. Lind (pro hac vice)
`mattlind@paulhastings.com
`Grayson S. Cornwell (pro hac vice)
`graysoncornwell@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 4500
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: (312) 499-6000
`Facsimile: (312) 499-6100
`
`Robert R. Laurenzi (pro hac vice)
`robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
`
`Ariell N. Bratton (SB # 317587)
`ariellbratton@paulhastings.com
`Cole D. Malmberg (SB # 305250)
`colemalmberg@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
`Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
`OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-03199-JD Document 86 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF MOTION
`FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
`BRIEFING SCHEDULE
`
`(CIVIL L.R. 6-1, 6-2, AND 7-12)
`Date: October 20, 2022
`Time: 10:00 a.m.
`Place: Courtroom 11, 19th Floor
`Judge: The Hon. James Donato
`
`
`
`Under Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.’s (“VoIP-Pal”) and
`Defendant Google LLC (“Google”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate
`as follows:
`WHEREAS, Google filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in the present lawsuit
`on September 2, 2022;
`WHEREAS, VoIP-Pal’s response to the Motion is currently due by September 16, 2022
`and Google’s reply to the response is currently due by September 23, 2022;
`WHEREAS, Google does not oppose VoIP-Pal’s request for a 10-day extension of time for
`the filing of VoIP-Pal’s response from September 16, 2022 to September 26, 2022 and VoIP-Pal
`does not oppose Google’s request for a 14-day extension for Google’s reply from September 23,
`2022 to October 7, 2022; and
`WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline that
`the Court has already fixed, including the hearing date for the Motion.
`
`
`
`2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
`OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-03199-JD Document 86 Filed 09/15/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that VoIP-Pal shall have up to and
`including September 26, 2022 to file a response to Google’s Motion for Judgment on the
`Pleadings and Google shall have up to and including October 7, 2022 to file its reply to VoIP-
`Pal’s response. The parties respectfully jointly request that the Court issue an order modifying
`the motion briefing schedule accordingly.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`Dated: September 15, 2022
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`
`By: /s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`By: /s/Matthias A. Kamber (with permission)
`
`Matthias A. Kamber
`
`Attorney for Defendant
`GOOGLE, LLC
`
`3
`
`Judge: The Hon. James Donato
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`
`
`
`Dated: September 15, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-03199-JD Document 86 Filed 09/15/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`Under Civ. Local Rule 5.1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
`concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Google.
`Dated: September 15, 2022
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`
`By: /s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`4
`
`Judge: The Hon. James Donato
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-03199-JD Document 86 Filed 09/15/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`Hon. James Donato
`United States District Court Judge
`
`5
`
`Judge: The Hon. James Donato
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-03199-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket