throbber
Case 3:22-cv-01832-WHO Document 59 Filed 10/28/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`R.N NEHUSHTAN TRUST LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 22-cv-01832-WHO
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 57
`
`
`
`On October 12, 2022, plaintiff R.N Nehushtan Trust Ltd. (“RNN Trust”) filed an
`
`unopposed motion to amend its August 5, 2022, Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
`
`Contentions. Dkt. No. 57. On October 26, 2022, defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a response
`
`confirming that it did not oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 58.1
`
`
`
`Patent Local Rule 3-6 allows for the amendment of the infringement contentions by court
`
`order “upon a timely showing of good cause.” RNN Trust has made such a showing. It seeks to
`
`amend its infringement contentions to include Apple’s latest generation of iPhones, Apple
`
`Watches, iOS, and watchOS, which were launched on or around September 16, 2022—after RNN
`
`Trust served its infringement contentions. Dkt. No. 57 at 3:3-15, 4:8-20. RNN Trust timely acted
`
`upon this new information; it sent Apple the proposed amended contentions and claim charts on
`
`September 27, 2022, and filed this motion about two weeks later. See id. at 4:26-27. And there is
`
`no indication that Apple will be unduly prejudiced by any such amendment, as shown by its non-
`
`opposition to this motion. See Patent Local R. 3-6 (listing “[n]on-exhaustive examples of
`
`
`1 Although the motion was unopposed, RNN Trust noticed a November 30, 2022, hearing “in the
`event the court prefers to hold a hearing.” Dkt. No. 57 at 2:9-11. A hearing is not necessary, as
`this uncontested motion can be decided without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). The
`November 30, 2022, hearing date is VACATED.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-01832-WHO Document 59 Filed 10/28/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`circumstances that may, absent undue prejudice to the non-moving party, support a finding of
`
`good cause”).
`
`RNN Trust’s unopposed motion is therefore GRANTED. RNN Trust shall serve its
`
`amended infringement contentions within three days of the issuance of this Order.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: October 28, 2022
`
`William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket