`
`
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED
`
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 89 Filed 04/06/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) has reviewed and complied with the Court’s Standing Order
`Governing Administrative Motions to File Materials Under Seal.
`Lyft has reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R. (dated
`November 1, 2021).
`Lyft respectfully submits this Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should
`Be Sealed for the following documents:
`ECF or
`Document
`Ex. No.
`ECF 88
`
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Motion to Compel
`Discovery and
`Compliance with Local
`Patent Rules
`
`Description of
`Portions to be Sealed
`Highlighted Portions at:
` Page 2: lines 14-15;
` Page 3: lines 16-17;
`19; 25-28;
` Page 4: lines 1-2; 26-
`27;
` Page 5: lines 2-7.
`
`Reason for Sealing
`
`The highlighted portions
`disclose information from:
` Exhibit 10 to Plaintiff Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel
`Discovery and Compliance
`with Local Patent Rules,
`and
` Ex. 18 to Plaintiff Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel
`Discovery and Compliance
`with Local Patent Rules,
`which AGIS designated as
`highly confidential and
`confidential, respectively. See
`Moshiri Decl. ¶ 5. Lyft takes
`no position with regard to
`these designations. Id.
`AGIS designated this
`document as highly
`confidential. See Moshiri
`Decl. ¶ 5. Lyft takes no
`position with regard to this
`designation. Id.
`Ex. 18 to Plaintiff Lyft,
`AGIS designated this
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel
`document as confidential. See
`Discovery and
`Moshiri Decl. ¶ 5. Lyft takes
`Compliance with Local
`no position with regard to this
`designation. Id.
`Patent Rules
`This motion is further supported by the Declaration of Arya Moshiri (“Moshiri Declaration”)
`in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be
`Sealed. Pursuant to Civil L.R., 79-5(e), Lyft identifies AGIS Software Development LLC as having
`designated the information above as Highly Confidential or Confidential.
`
`Exhibit 10 to Plaintiff
`Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to
`Compel Discovery and
`Compliance with Local
`Patent Rules
`
`ECF 88-
`10, Ex.
`10
`
`ECF 88-
`18, Ex.
`18
`
`Entire Document
`
`Entire Document
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 89 Filed 04/06/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`This motion is narrowly tailored to seal materials necessary and able to overcome the
`presumption in favor of access to court records. This motion is accompanied by the Moshiri
`Declaration and a proposed order. Lyft therefore lodges with the Court copies of (1) Plaintiff Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Patent Rules, (2) Exhibit 10 to
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Patent Rules, and (3)
`Ex. 18 to Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Patent
`Rules.
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 89 Filed 04/06/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`Dated: April 6, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Arya Moshiri
`Arya Moshiri
`
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are
`being served with a copy of this document via electronic mail on April 6, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Arya Moshiri
`Arya Moshiri
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`