throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 1 of 96
`
`
`
`Exhibit K
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 2 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Based on information presently available,1 Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) contends that
`Defendant Lyft Technologies Inc. (“Lyft” or “Plaintiff”) infringes claims 2, 10, 12, and 13 (the “Asserted Claims”) of U.S. Patent No.
`8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) through the Accused Products which are manufactured, sold, offered for sale, and/or used by Lyft
`
`The Accused Products comprise the Lyft and Lyft Driver applications, servers, and services manufactured, used, or sold by Lyft,
`Inc. during and after 2016. AGIS Software reserves the right to seek leave of court to amend this list of Accused Products after the
`filing of an amended complaint or as discovery progresses.
`
`Lyft directly infringes each of the Asserted Claims by making, using, importing, testing, distributing, selling, and/or offering for
`sale the Accused Products in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`Lyft indirectly infringes the Asserted Claims in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by inducing third parties, including its users
`
`and/or customers, to directly infringe through their operation and use of the Accused Products. Lyft has knowingly and intentionally
`induced this direct infringement by, inter alia, (i) selling, importing, or otherwise providing the Accused Products to third parties with
`the intent that the Accused Products will be operated and used in a manner that practices the Asserted Claims; and (ii) marketing and
`advertising the Accused Products. Lyft’s marketing and promotional materials for the Accused Products are found, for example, on
`Lyft’s website, and in App stores of operating systems for which the Accused Products are made available. For example, Lyft’s website
`offers customers instructions and/or manuals for the Accused Products that instruct customers to, among other things, use the accused
`services in the Accused Products. Lyft’s website also offers support to customers, including instruction to, among other things, use the
`Accused Products share location information with a group of users. Lyft knows, or should have known, that its actions will result in
`infringement of the Asserted Claims, or subjectively believes that there is a high probability that its actions will result in infringement
`of the Asserted Claims but has taken deliberate actions to avoid learning these facts.
`
`
`1 These infringement contentions are provided on a provisional basis to comply with the deadline for P.L.R. 3-1. However, at this
`time, there is no operative complaint asserting non-infringement of any patent claim in this action, and these contentions are not
`responsive to any claim or cause of action. AGIS Software reserves the right to update these contentions upon receipt of an amended
`complaint. These March 18, 2022 amended contentions do not add or modify any theories of infringement and are provided solely for
`the purpose of making clear that AGIS Software does not allege infringement of any Lyft iOS-based applications and that AGIS
`Software does not rely on any Apple products.
`
`D-1
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 3 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`Lyft also contributorily infringes each of the Asserted Claims in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by selling, importing, offering
`
`for sale, and otherwise providing the Accused Products, which when used directly infringe the Asserted Claims. The Accused Products
`constitute a material part of the Asserted Claims.
`
`The following chart identifies specifically where each limitation of each Asserted Claim is found within the Accused Products,
`
`and in particular, the corresponding elements that meet the limitations in the Lyft and Lyft Driver applications, services, and services.
`On information and belief, each charted version of the Lyft Rider and Driver Apps are representative of all versions of the Accused
`Products, including all variants of the Accused Products made, sold, offered for sale, or used on any version of the Android and iOS
`operating systems.
`
`AGIS Software does not concede that any claims of the ʼ970 Patent that are not listed below are not infringed by the identified
`
`Accused Products. Moreover, the citations to certain documents and other information below are intended to be exemplary only and in
`no way foreclose AGIS from citing or relying on additional documents, information, source code, and/or testimony at a later time. These
`contentions are preliminary in nature and an analysis of Lyft’s products, internal documentation, source code, and/or testimony from
`relevant witnesses may more fully and accurately describe the infringing features of its accused products. Accordingly, AGIS Software
`reserves the right to seek leave of court to supplement, correct, modify, and/or amend these contentions once such additional information
`is made available to AGIS Software. Furthermore, AGIS Software reserves the right to seek leave of court to supplement, correct,
`modify, and/or amend these contentions as discovery in this case progresses; in view of the Court’s claim construction order(s);2 in view
`of any positions taken by Lyft, including but not limited to positions on claim construction, invalidity, and/or non-infringement; and in
`connection with the preparation and exchange of expert reports.
`
`The contents of each claim cell below on which another claim cell depends are expressly incorporated by reference in that
`dependent cell, as if set forth in their entirety therein.
`
`
`2 The construction of claim terms herein is consistent with the constructions in AGIS Software Dev. LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc.,
`No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG, Dkt. 205 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2018); AGIS Software Dev. LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-00361-JRG, Dkt.
`147 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 8, 2020); AGIS Software Dev. LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al., No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG, Dkt. 213 (E.D. Tex.
`Nov. 10, 2021). AGIS Software reserves the right to update its constructions and contentions in view of this Court’s claim
`construction order.
`
`D-2
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 4 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`(Unasserted) 1[P].
`The Lyft Accused Products comprise a communication system for transmitting, receiving, confirming receipt,
`A communication
`and responding to an electronic message. Lyft infringe directly and/or indirectly by providing a
`system for
`communication system for transmitting, receiving, confirming receipt, and responding to an electronic
`transmitting,
`message.
`
`receiving,
`
`confirming receipt,
`For example, Lyft provides Lyft Rider app for passengers and Lyft Driver app for drivers. The Lyft apps for
`and responding to
`riders and drivers, in conjunction with Lyft’s servers and services, provide users with interactive methods to
`an electronic
`request, view, and track locations of passengers/riders using real-time maps and communications. The Lyft
`message,
`server(s) and their services communicate with the Lyft apps for riders and drivers. The Lyft server(s) and their
`comprising:
`services host information related to and instructions for processing user/device/vehicle accounts, location data,
`and map data. The claimed methods are distributed by Lyft in the Lyft apps. The claimed methods are
`used/tested by Lyft using the Lyft apps. The claimed methods are downloaded and installed by Lyft’s
`customers (riders) and personnel (drivers, personnel) at the direction/encouragement of Lyft and used by
`Lyft’s customers and Lyft’s personnel.
`
`The Lyft Driver application receives an electronically transmitted request for a ride message and
`acknowledges the receipt of the message which triggers a forced message alert that locks the device for a
`period of time until the driver sends a response message (decline or accept) to clear the locked display
`(“transmitting, receiving, confirming receipt, and responding to an electronic message”).
`
`
` https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-ca/articles/115013079208-Lyft-Driver-app
`
`
`
`
`D-3
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 5 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.lyft.com/drive-with-lyft
`
`
` https://www.lyft.com/hub/posts/how-to-give-a-ride
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D-4
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 6 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`Driver’s device
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`
`D-5
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 7 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`
`
`D-6
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 8 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-7
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 9 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`1[A]. a
`The Lyft Accused Products comprise: a predetermined network of participants, wherein each participant has a
`predetermined
`similarly equipped PDA/cell phone that includes a CPU and a touch screen display a CPU and memory.
`
`network of
`
`participants,
`
`wherein each
`For example, Lyft is a network of drivers and passengers where drivers connect with individuals requesting a
`participant has a
`ride. Drivers access the platform using the Lyft Driver app and passengers access the platform using the Lyft
`similarly equipped
`app on their respective smart devices including but not limited to smartphones and tablets comprising a
`PDA/cell phone
`display, a processor and a storage media.
`that includes a
`
`CPU and a touch
`screen display a
`CPU and memory
`
` https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-ca/articles/115013079208-Lyft-Driver-app
`
`
` https://www.lyft.com/drive-with-lyft
`
`
`D-8
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 10 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.lyft.com/hub/posts/how-to-give-a-ride
`
`
`
`
`Driver’s device
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`
`D-9
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 11 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`
`D-10
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 12 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-11
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 13 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`
` http://www.mobilecellphonerepairing.com/mobile-phone-parts.html
`
`
`
`
`
`
` http://www.mobilecellphonerepairing.com/mobile-phone-parts.html
`
`
`
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: a data transmission means that facilitates the transmission of
`electronic files between said PDA/cell phones in different locations
`
`
`
`For example, Lyft’s servers connect passengers to nearby drivers when a request for a ride is placed. The
`servers receive a passenger’s request for a ride and communicate the request to nearby drivers. The nearby
`drivers receive the request for a ride from the passengers to which they either accept or decline the request.
`The locations of the passenger and the nearby drivers are different from each other.
`
`1[B]. a data
`transmission
`means that
`facilitates the
`transmission of
`electronic files
`between said
`PDA/cell phones
`in different
`locations
`
`D-12
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 14 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.lyft.com/hub/posts/how-to-give-a-ride
`
`
`
`
`Driver’s device
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`
`D-13
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 15 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: a sender PDA/cell phone and at least one recipient PDA/cell phone
`for each electronic message
`
`
`
`
`1[C]. a sender
`PDA/cell phone
`and at least one
`recipient PDA/cell
`
`D-14
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 16 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`phone for each
`For example, Lyft’s servers connects the passengers (“sender”) to the nearby drivers (“recipient”) when a
`electronic message
`request for a ride is placed. The servers receive a passenger’s request for a ride and communicates the request
`to nearby drivers. The nearby drivers receive the request for a ride from the passengers to which they either
`accept or decline the request.
`
`
` https://www.lyft.com/hub/posts/how-to-give-a-ride
`
`
`
`Driver’s device
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`D-15
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 17 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`D-16
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 18 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-17
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 19 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`D-18
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 20 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D-19
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 21 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`1[D]. a forced
`message alert
`software
`application
`program including
`a list of required
`possible responses
`to be selected by a
`participant
`recipient of a
`forced message
`response loaded on
`each participating
`PDA/cell phone
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: a forced message alert software application program including a list
`of required possible responses to be selected by a participant recipient of a forced message response loaded on
`each participating PDA/cell phone
`
`
`
`For example, Lyft provides Lyft app for passengers and Lyft Driver app for drivers. The Lyft apps for riders
`and drivers, in conjunction with Lyft’s servers and services, provide users with interactive methods to request,
`view, and track locations of passengers/riders using real-time maps and communications. The Lyft server(s)
`and their services communicate with the Lyft apps for riders and drivers. The Lyft server(s) and their services
`host information related to and instructions for processing user/device/vehicle accounts, location data, and map
`data. The claimed methods are distributed by Lyft in the Lyft apps. The claimed methods are used/tested by
`Lyft using the Lyft apps. The claimed methods are downloaded and installed by Lyft’s customers (riders) and
`personnel (drivers, personnel) at the direction/encouragement of Lyft and used by Lyft’s customers and Lyft’s
`personnel.
`
`The Lyft Driver application receives an electronically transmitted request for a ride which triggers a forced
`message alert that locks the device for a period of time until the driver (“recipient”) sends a response message
`(decline or accept) to clear the locked display.
`
`
`D-20
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 22 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Driver’s device
`screen locked
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`
`D-21
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 23 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`D-22
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 24 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-23
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 25 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D-24
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 26 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: means for attaching a forced message alert software packet to a
`voice or text message creating a forced message alert that is transmitted by said sender PDA/cell phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell phone, said forced message alert software packet containing a list of possible required
`responses and requiring the forced message alert software on said recipient PDA/cell phone to transmit an
`automatic acknowledgment to the sender PDA/cell phone as soon as said forced message alert is received by
`the recipient PDA/cell phone.
`
`
`
`For example, the Lyft Driver app receives an electronically transmitted request for a ride from a passenger
`which triggers a forced message alert that locks the driver’s device for a period of time until the driver
`(“recipient”) sends a response message (decline or accept) to clear the locked display.
`
`For example, at the backend, each nearby driver’s Lyft app that receives the ride request sends an
`acknowledgement of receipt to the Lyft server(s). The acknowledgement is communicated to the rider’s Lyft
`app via the Lyft server(s).
`
`
`1[E]. means for
`attaching a forced
`message alert
`software packet to
`a voice or text
`message creating a
`forced message
`alert that is
`transmitted by said
`sender PDA/cell
`phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone, said forced
`message alert
`software packet
`containing a list of
`possible required
`responses and
`requiring the
`forced message
`alert software on
`said recipient
`PDA/cell phone to
`transmit an
`automatic
`acknowledgment
`to the sender
`
`D-25
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 27 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`PDA/cell phone as
`Driver’s device
`soon as said forced
`screen locked
`message alert is
`displaying
`received by the
`passenger’s ride
`recipient PDA/cell
`request message
`phone;
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`D-26
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 28 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`D-27
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 29 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-28
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 30 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`D-29
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 31 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: means for requiring a required manual response from the response
`list by the recipient in order to clear recipient's response list from recipient's cell phone display.
`
`
`
`For example, the Lyft Driver app receives an electronically transmitted request for a ride from a passenger
`which triggers a forced message alert that locks the driver’s device for a period of time until the driver
`(“recipient”) sends a response message (decline (cross button) or accept) to clear the locked display.
`
`
`
`1[F]. means for
`requiring a
`required manual
`response from the
`response list by
`the recipient in
`order to clear
`recipient's
`response list from
`recipient's cell
`phone display;
`
`D-30
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 32 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`D-31
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 33 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-32
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 34 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`
`
`D-33
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 35 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Driver’s device
`screen locked
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`
`
`
`D-34
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 36 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`Driver’s device screen
`locked displaying
`passenger’s ride request
`message is removed after
`driver chooses the
`response (here, accept
`response)
`
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b31WorLlcqE at 9:40, Annotated
`
`D-35
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 37 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: means for receiving and displaying a listing of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones have automatically acknowledged the forced message alert and which recipient PDA/cell
`phones have not automatically acknowledged the forced message alert.
`
`
`
`For example, at the backend, each nearby driver’s Lyft App (“recipient PDA/cell phone”) that received ride
`request sends an acknowledgement of receipt to Lyft server(s).
`
`
`1[G]. means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert and which
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones have not
`automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert;
`
`D-36
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 38 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`D-37
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 39 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-38
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 40 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`
`
`D-39
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 41 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Driver’s device
`screen locked
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
`
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: means for periodically resending said forced message alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell phones that have not automatically acknowledged the forced message alert.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1[H]. means for
`periodically
`resending said
`forced message
`alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones that have
`
`D-40
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 42 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`not automatically
`For example, at the backend, each nearby driver’s Lyft app that received ride request sends an
`acknowledged the
`acknowledgement of receipt to Lyft server(s). Therefore, the second communication of the ride request is sent
`forced message
`to those drivers’ Lyft app who did not acknowledge the ride request message. This communication of ride
`alert; and
`request is periodically sent until the ride is accepted by any driver.
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0RDMLcmOgU at 4:01
`
`
`
`
`D-41
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 43 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`D-42
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 44 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`
`
`Nearby
`Drivers’
`location
`
`Passenger’s
`location
`
`
`
`
`
`D-43
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 45 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`Driver’s device
`screen locked
`displaying
`passenger’s ride
`request message
`
`
`
`
`
` https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUy9poJDng at 10:24, Annotated
`
`
`Further, to the extent this element is performed at least in part by Lyft's software source code, AGIS reserves
`the right to supplement these contentions pursuant to production of such source code by Lyft and to the extent
`Lyft requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any other reasons.
`
`The Lyft Accused Products infringe directly and/or indirectly by performing, inducing others to perform,
`and/or contributing to the performance of: means for receiving and displaying a listing of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones have transmitted a manual response to said forced message alert and details the response
`from each recipient PDA/cell phone that responded.
`
`For example, at the backend, a list of all the drivers’ Lyft app that transmitted the response to a ride request
`message of a passenger are maintained at Lyft’s server(s). This ensures that drivers who declined the ride do
`
`1[I]. means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have transmitted a
`manual response
`
`D-44
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 84-12 Filed 04/01/22 Page 46 of 96
`Attachment D for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Lyft Accused Products
`
`
`
`Claim - 8,213,970 Exemplary Supporting Evidence Regarding Accused Products
`to said forced
`not further receive the ride request of the same p

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket