throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 79 Filed 03/28/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 79 Filed 03/28/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) has reviewed and complied with the Court’s Standing Order
`Governing Administrative Motions to File Materials Under Seal.
`Lyft has reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R. 79-5
`and 7-11 (dated November 1, 2021).
`Lyft respectfully submits this Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should
`Be Sealed for the following documents:
`ECF or
`Document
`Exh. No.
`ECF 78
`
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Motion for Leave to File
`First Amended
`Complaint
`
`Highlighted Portions at:
` Page 5: lines 6-12, 18,
`23-26;
` Page 6: line 4;
` Page 7: lines 13-14
`
`Highlighted Portions at:
` Page 4: lines 8-10, 16-
`17;
` Page 5: lines 18-22
` Page 14: lines 13-17;
` Page 15: lines 1, 16-
`19, 25-28;
` Page 16: lines 15-16,
`20-27;
` Page 17: lines 5-7, 12-
`13
`
`Entire Document
`
`ECF 78-2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration
`of Bethany R. Salpietra
`ISO Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Motion for Leave to File
`First Amended
`Complaint (First
`Amended Complaint)
`
`ECF 78-8 Exhibit 7 to Declaration
`of Bethany R. Salpietra
`ISO Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Motion for Leave to File
`First Amended
`Complaint (Defendant
`AGIS Software’s First
`Supplemental
`Objections and
`Responses to Lyft Inc.’s
`First Set of
`
`The highlighted portions
`disclose information from
`Exhibits 7 and 11 to Plaintiff
`Lyft, Inc.’s Motion for Leave
`to File First Amended
`Complaint, which AGIS
`Software Development LLC
`(“AGIS Software”)
`designated as highly
`confidential. Lyft takes no
`position with regard to this
`designation.
`AGIS Software designated
`the source document from
`which the information was
`taken as highly confidential.
`Lyft takes no position with
`regard to such designations.
`
`AGIS Software designated
`this document as highly
`confidential. Lyft takes no
`position with regard to this
`designation.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 79 Filed 03/28/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`ECF 78-
`12
`
`Entire Document
`
`AGIS Software designated
`this document as highly
`confidential. Lyft takes no
`position with regard to this
`designation.
`
`Jurisdictional
`Interrogatories)
`Exhibit 11 to
`Declaration of Bethany
`R. Salpietra ISO
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Motion for Leave to File
`First Amended
`Complaint (30(b)(6)
`Deposition Transcript of
`Thomas Meriam, dated
`March 22, 2022)
`This motion is further supported by the Declaration of Bethany R. Salpietra (“Salpietra
`Declaration”) in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s
`Material Should Be Sealed. Pursuant to Civil L.R., 79-5(e), Lyft identifies AGIS Software as having
`designated the information above as Highly Confidential or Confidential.
`This motion is narrowly tailored to seal materials necessary and able to overcome the
`presumption in favor of access to court records. This motion is accompanied by the Salpietra
`Declaration and a proposed order. Lyft therefore lodges with the Court copies of (1) Plaintiff Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, (2) Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Bethany
`R. Salpietra in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint,
`(3) Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Bethany R. Salpietra in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion for
`Leave to File First Amended Complaint, and (4) Exhibit 11 to Declaration of Bethany R. Salpietra
`in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.
`
`Dated: March 28, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`
`LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 79 Filed 03/28/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket