Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 148 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`Additional counsel listed on signature page
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT STATUS UPDATE
`
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s May 19, 2022 Order staying this action pending disposition of the ex
`parte reexaminations (“EPR”) before the United State Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and
`the inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, Plaintiff
`Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) (collectively, the
`“Parties”) submit this Joint Status Report regarding the status of the EPRs concerning U.S. Patent
`Nos. 7,031,728 (the “’728 Patent”) and 7,630,724 (the “’724 Patent”) and the IPR proceedings
`relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 10,299,100 (the “’100 Patent”) and 10,341,838 (the “’838 Patent”).
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ STATUS UPDATE
`
`1
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 148 Filed 11/15/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
` The EPR concerning the ’728 Patent (Serial No. 90/014,890) is currently pending,
`awaiting a response from AGIS to the USPTO’s latest office action. The USPTO
`issued an Order Granting Ex Parte Reexamination on December 6, 2021 and,
`subsequently, issued a Non-Final Office Action on September 1, 2022, rejecting
`asserted claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. AGIS filed a Petition for Extension of Time
`under 37 C.F.R. § 1.550(c) on September 30, 2022, which was granted by the USPTO
`on October 25, 2022, resulting in an extension of AGIS’s response date to January
`3, 2023.
` The EPR concerning the ’724 Patent (Serial No. 90/014,889) is currently pending,
`awaiting a response from the USPTO to AGIS’s latest actions. The USPTO issued
`an Order Granting Ex Parte Reexamination on December 7, 2021 and, subsequently,
`issued a Non-Final Office Action on July 7, 2022 rejecting asserted claims 9 and 12-
`16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.1 AGIS filed a Petition for Extension of Time under 37
`C.F.R. § 1.550(c) on August 23, 2022, which was granted by the USPTO on August
`24, 2022, resulting in an extension of AGIS’s response date to November 7, 2022.
`On November 7, 2022, AGIS filed its Response to the July 7, 2022 Non-Final Office
`Action, which included amendments to asserted independent claims 9 and 16 in
`addition to remarks.
` The IPR petitions filed by Lyft challenging the ’100 Patent (IPR2022-00514;
`IPR2022-00515) were both instituted on June 2, 2022 with a final written decision
`expected by June 2, 2023. AGIS filed its Patent Owner Response on October 12,
`2022, and Lyft’s deadline to file its Reply to AGIS’s Patent Owner Response is
`December 30, 2022. AGIS’s deadline to file its Sur-Reply to Lyft’s Reply is due on
`February 13, 2023.
` The IPR petition filed by Lyft challenging the ’838 Patent (IPR2022-00513) was
`instituted on June 2, 2022 with a final written decision expected by June 2, 2023.
`AGIS filed its Patent Owner Response on October 12, 2022, and Lyft’s deadline to
`
`1 The Non-Final Office Action dated December 7, 2021 also rejects unasserted claim 10.
`
`PARTIES’ STATUS UPDATE
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 148 Filed 11/15/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`file its Reply to AGIS’s Patent Owner Response is December 30, 2022. AGIS’s
`deadline to file its Sur-Reply to Lyft’s Reply is due on February 13, 2023.
`
`Dated: November 15, 2022
`
`By:
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile (310) 826-9226
`
`Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 5-1(h)(3), I attest that concurrence
`in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other Signatories to this document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`PARTIES’ STATUS UPDATE
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`