throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 132-1 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF BETHANY R.
`SALPIETRA IN SUPPORT OF
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S AMENDED
`REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
`TO STAY PENDING PATENT OFFICE
`PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`Date: August 11, 2022
`Time: 9:00 a.m.
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S AMENDED
`REPLY ISO ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING
`PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 132-1 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`I, Bethany R. Salpietra, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am over the age of 21 and am fully competent to make this declaration. I have
`personal knowledge of all facts recited herein and state that such facts are true and correct to my
`knowledge or information and belief, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently about
`them.
`
`I am duly admitted to practice law in the State of Texas and before this Court. I am
`2.
`counsel at the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P., 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 900, Dallas, TX 75201, and
`I represent Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) in the above-captioned action.
`3.
`I have reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R.
`(dated November 1, 2021).
`4.
`I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Amended Reply in Support of Its
`Motion to Stay Pending Patent Office Proceedings Involving the Patents-in-Suit.
`Attached as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of the Transcript of Proceedings
`5.
`before the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman on January 27, 2022 in the above-captioned case.
`Attached as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of search results from Docket
`6.
`Navigator showing all cases where AGIS Software Development LLC was a party in the Eastern
`District of Texas.
`
`Executed on this 10th day of May, 2022, at Dallas, Texas, County of Dallas. I declare under
`penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and
`correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: May 10, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Bethany R. Salpietra
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S AMENDED
`REPLY ISO ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING
`PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
`
`2
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket