`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF BETHANY R.
`SALPIETRA IN SUPPORT OF
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S AMENDED
`REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
`TO STAY PENDING PATENT OFFICE
`PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`Date: August 11, 2022
`Time: 9:00 a.m.
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S AMENDED
`REPLY ISO ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING
`PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 132-1 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`I, Bethany R. Salpietra, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am over the age of 21 and am fully competent to make this declaration. I have
`personal knowledge of all facts recited herein and state that such facts are true and correct to my
`knowledge or information and belief, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently about
`them.
`
`I am duly admitted to practice law in the State of Texas and before this Court. I am
`2.
`counsel at the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P., 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 900, Dallas, TX 75201, and
`I represent Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) in the above-captioned action.
`3.
`I have reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R.
`(dated November 1, 2021).
`4.
`I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Amended Reply in Support of Its
`Motion to Stay Pending Patent Office Proceedings Involving the Patents-in-Suit.
`Attached as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of the Transcript of Proceedings
`5.
`before the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman on January 27, 2022 in the above-captioned case.
`Attached as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of search results from Docket
`6.
`Navigator showing all cases where AGIS Software Development LLC was a party in the Eastern
`District of Texas.
`
`Executed on this 10th day of May, 2022, at Dallas, Texas, County of Dallas. I declare under
`penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and
`correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: May 10, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Bethany R. Salpietra
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S AMENDED
`REPLY ISO ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING
`PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
`
`2
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`