`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION
`TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 108-2 Filed 04/19/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`The designating party possesses overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right
`of public access to the record of (1) the identified portions of the Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in
`Support of Its Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, (2) entirety of of Exhibit 13 to
`Declaration of Bethany R. Salpietra in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Its
`Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored.
`IT IS SO ORDERED that Lyft’s Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material
`Should Be Sealed for the (1) the identified portions of the Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in Support of
`Its Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, (2) the entirety of Exhibit 13 to Declaration
`of Bethany R. Salpietra in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave
`to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED.
`
`Dated:
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Judge
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION
`TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`