`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF BETHANY R.
`SALPIETRA IN SUPPORT OF
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 108-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`I, Bethany R. Salpietra, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am over the age of 21 and am fully competent to make this declaration. I have
`personal knowledge of all facts recited herein and state that such facts are true and correct to my
`knowledge or information and belief, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently about
`them.
`
`I am duly admitted to practice law in the State of Texas and before this Court. I am
`2.
`counsel at the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P., 2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900, Dallas, TX 75201, and I
`represent Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) in the above-captioned action.
`3.
`I have reviewed and complied with the Court’s Standing Order Re Civil Cases (dated
`February 18, 2021).
`4.
`I have reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R.
`79-5 and 7-11 (dated November 1, 2021).
`5.
`I submit this declaration in support of Defendant Lyft, Inc.’s Administrative Motion
`to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed for the following documents:
`ECF or
`Document
`Portion(s) to Seal
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`Exh. No.
`ECF 107 Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Reply in Support of Its
`Motion for Leave to
`File First Amended
`Complaint
`
`Highlighted Portions at:
` Page 4: lines 15-21, 22-
`27;
` Page 5: lines 1-2, 24-
`27;
` Page 6: lines 2- 3;
` Page 8: lines 1-2, 10-11
`
`The highlighted portions
`disclose information from
`Exhibit 13 to Declaration of
`Bethany R. Salpietra ISO
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply
`ISO Its Motion for Leave to
`File First Amended
`Complaint, which AGIS
`Software Development LLC
`(“AGIS Software”)
`designated as highly
`confidential. Lyft takes no
`position with regard to this
`designation.
`AGIS Software designated
`the source document from
`which the information was
`taken as highly confidential.
`Lyft takes no position with
`regard to such designations.
`
`Entire Document
`
`ECF 107-
`2
`
`Exhibit 13 to
`Declaration of Bethany
`R. Salpietra ISO
`Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s
`Reply ISO Its Motion
`for Leave to File First
`Amended Complaint
`(excerpts from a true
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`1
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 108-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`and correct copy of the
`March 22, 2022
`Deposition Tr. of
`Thomas Meriam)
`
`The documents that Lyft seeks to file under seal contain confidential information of
`6.
`AGIS Software. Lyft understands that AGIS Software considers this information confidential. Lyft
`takes no position with regard to these designations.
`7.
`Lyft therefore lodges with the Court copies of (1) Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in
`Support of Its Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, (2) Exhibit 13 to Declaration of
`Bethany R. Salpietra in Support of Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave to
`File First Amended Complaint.
`8.
`Executed on this 19th day of April, 2022 at Dallas, Texas, County of Dallas. I declare
`under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true
`and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: April 19, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Bethany R. Salpietra
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`2
`ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`