throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 107-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF BETHANY R.
`SALPIETRA IN SUPPORT OF
`PLAINTIFF LYFT, INC.’S REPLY IN
`SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR LEAVE
`TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`
`Date: July 28, 2022
`Time: 9:00 A.M.
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S REPLY ISO ITS
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FAC
`
`
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 107-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`I, Bethany R. Salpietra, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am over the age of 21 and am fully competent to make this declaration. I have
`personal knowledge of all facts recited herein and state that such facts are true and correct to my
`knowledge or information and belief, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently about
`them.
`
`I am duly admitted to practice law in the State of Texas and before this Court. I am
`2.
`counsel at the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P., 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 900, Dallas, TX 75201, and
`I represent Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) in the above-captioned action.
`3.
`I have reviewed and complied with the Northern District of California’s Civil L.R.
`(dated November 1, 2021).
`4.
`I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of its Motion for
`Leave to File First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
`5.
`I met and conferred with counsel for AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS
`Software”) on April 15, 2022.
`6.
`At the April 15, 2022 meet and confer, counsel for AGIS Software explained that
`AGIS, Inc. has cooperated in previous patent infringement litigations brought by AGIS Software
`but has refused to similarly cooperate in the above-captioned action. In particular, counsel for AGIS
`Software, who is also counsel for AGIS, Inc., explained that AGIS Inc. previously provided its
`documents to its counsel for production in previous AGIS Software litigations without a subpoena.
`7.
`Attached as Exhibit 13 are excerpts from a true and correct copy of the March 22,
`2022 Deposition Tr. of Thomas Meriam, which AGIS Software designated as highly confidential.
`Lyft takes no position with regard to this designation.
`8.
`Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of a screen capture showing the
`2021 Public Information Report for “AGIS Software Development LLC” available via the Texas
`Comptroller of Public Accounts website at https://mycpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/coaSearchBtn.
`9.
`Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of a Florida Department of State
`webpage showing the results of an entity name search for “Advanced Ground Information Systems,
`Inc.”,
`available
`at
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S REPLY ISO ITS
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FAC
`
`1
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 107-1 Filed 04/19/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName
`&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=ADVANCEDGROUNDINFORMATIONSYSTE%2
`0P040000995490&aggregateId=domp-p04000099549-b00d4e06-db2d-4557-9f40-
`bc08b21327e9&searchTerm=Advanced%20Ground%20Information%20Systems%2C%20Inc.&li
`stNameOrder=ADVANCEDGROUNDINFORMATIONSYSTE%20P040000995490.
`10.
`Attached as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of a Florida Department of State
`webpage showing the results of an entity name search for “AGIS Holdings, Inc.”, available at
`https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName
`&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=AGISHOLDINGS%20P170000428680&aggregateId
`=domp-p17000042868-04d3c28f-1fa3-48b8-897a-
`f40c78b7e601&searchTerm=AGIS%20Holdings%2C%20Inc.&listNameOrder=AGISHOLDING
`S%20P170000428680.
`Executed on this 19th day of April, 2022 at Dallas, Texas, County of Dallas. I declare under
`penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and
`correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: April 19, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Bethany R. Salpietra
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28`
`
`SALPIETRA DECL. ISO LYFT’S REPLY ISO ITS
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FAC
`
`2
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket