`
`
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`LYFT, INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
` Case No. 3:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT, LLC’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`SEAL
`
` October 16, 2023
`Date:
` 9:00 a.m.
`Time:
`Location: Courtroom 3
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED ORDER, CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 105-2 Filed 04/18/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`The designating party purports to possess overriding confidentiality interests
`that overcome the right of public access to the record of the identified portions of the
`(1) Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC’s Response in Opposition to Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Rules; (2) Exhibit 1
`to Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC’s Response in Opposition to Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Rules; (3) Exhibit 2
`to Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC’s Response in Opposition to Lyft,
`Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Rules.
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored.
`IT IS SO ORDERED that AGIS Software’s Administrative Motion to Seal for
`the (1) identified portions of Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC’s
`Response in Opposition to Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Compliance
`with Local Rules; (2) entirety of Exhibit 1 to Defendant AGIS Software Development
`LLC’s Response in Opposition to Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Discovery and
`Compliance with Local Rules; and (3) entirety of Exhibit 2 to Defendant AGIS
`Software Development LLC’s Response in Opposition to Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to
`Compel Discovery and Compliance with Local Rules. is GRANTED.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`
`
`
`Dated:____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`PROPOSED ORDER, CASE NO. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`