Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit 1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`afabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang
`bwang@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`LYFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
` Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT LLC’S DISCLOSURE
`OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Hon. Judge Beth Labson Freeman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) hereby makes the
`following infringement disclosure under the Patent Local Rules with respect to United States Patent
`Nos. 7,031,728; 7,630,724; 8,213,970; 10,299,100; and 10,341,838 (collectively, the “Patents-in-
`Suit”). AGIS Software’s investigation is ongoing and discovery has not yet commenced.
`Accordingly, these disclosures are based on information available to AGIS Software at this time.
`AGIS Software reserves the right to supplement this disclosure after further discovery regarding the
`Lyft Accused Products set forth below. AGIS Software also reserves the right to assert additional
`claims of the Patents-in-Suit, accuse different products, or find literal and/or equivalent infringing
`elements in the Lyft Accused Products.1
`I. DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-1
`A. ASSERTED CLAIMS
`Plaintiff Lyft Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Lyft”) has infringed and continues to infringe at least the
`following claims of the Patents-in-Suit in connection with the Lyft Accused Products set forth
`below:
`
`• Claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 7,031,728 (the “’728 Patent”);
`• Claims 9, 12-16 of U.S. Patent No. 7,630,724 (the “’724 Patent”);
`• Claims 2, 10, 12-13 of U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”);
`• Claims 1-31 of U.S. Patent No. 10,299,100 (the “’100 Patent”); and
`• Claims 1-26 of U.S. Patent No. 10,341,838 (the “’838 Patent”).
`
`
`1 These infringement contentions are provided on a provisional basis to comply with the deadline
`for P.L.R. 3-1. However, at this time, there is no operative complaint asserting non-infringement of
`any patent claim in this action, and these contentions are not responsive to any claim or cause of
`action. AGIS Software reserves the right to update these contentions upon receipt of an amended
`complaint. These March 18, 2022 amended contentions do not add or modify any theories of
`infringement and are provided solely for the purpose of making clear that AGIS Software does not
`allege infringement of any Lyft iOS-based applications and that AGIS Software does not rely on
`any Apple products.
`
`
`
`2
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`AGIS Software reserves the right to seek leave of court to add, delete, substitute, or
`otherwise amend this list of asserted claims should further discovery, the Court’s claim construction,
`or other circumstances so merit.
`B. ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`AGIS Software is currently aware that the following Lyft Products infringe each of the
`Patents-in-Suit, either alone or in concert with one or more other Lyft Accused Products:
`• Lyft applications, services, and servers; and
`• Lyft Driver applications, services, and servers.
`AGIS Software reserves the right to amend this list of accused instrumentalities, as well as
`other information contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information
`learned during the course of discovery including, but not limited to, the inclusion of newly-released
`products or any other equivalent devices ascertained through discovery.
`C. CLAIM CHARTS
`Claim charts identifying a location of every element of every asserted claim of the Patents-
`in-Suit within Lyft Accused Products are attached hereto as Exhibits A-E. AGIS Software believes
`that the citations in the claim charts are representative of all Lyft Accused Products. For example,
`where AGIS Software cites reference material or images representing an application, service, or
`server that citation is representative for all other such applications, services, or servers including all
`prior and future versions unless otherwise noted. AGIS Software reserves the right to amend these
`claim charts as well as other information contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to
`incorporate new information learned during the course of discovery including, but not limited to,
`information that is not publicly available or readily discernible without discovery. AGIS Software
`further reserves the right to amend these claim charts, as well as other information contained in this
`document and the exhibits attached hereto, pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1(g) and 3-6.
`D. LITERAL INFRINGEMENT AND DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
`AGIS Software asserts that, under the proper construction of the asserted claims and their
`claim terms, the limitations of the asserted claims of the Patents-in-Suit are literally present in the
`
`
`3
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO LYFT’S JURISDICTIONAL 30(b)(6) NOTICE
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Lyft Accused Products as set forth in the claim charts attached hereto as Exhibits A-E. AGIS
`Software contends that any and all elements found not to be literally infringed are infringed under
`the doctrine of equivalents because the differences between the claimed inventions and the accused
`instrumentalities, if any, are insubstantial.
`AGIS Software contends that Lyft directly infringes the asserted claims by making, using,
`offering for sale, selling, and importing into the United States the accused instrumentalities as well
`as indirectly infringe by contributing to and/or inducing others (e.g., Lyft customers or its Lyft
`customers’ customers) to directly infringe those claims by making, using, offering for sale, or selling
`the Lyft Accused Products. AGIS Software contends that Lyft directly infringes the asserted claims
`by testing the Lyft Accused Products in the United States.
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6(a)(1), AGIS Software reserves the right to amend its
`Infringement Contentions as to literal infringement or infringement under the doctrine of
`equivalents, e.g., in light of the Court’s claim construction.
`E. PRIORITY DATES
`Under P.R. 3-1(e), each of the asserted claims of the Patents-in-Suit are entitled to a priority
`date of at least as early as September 21, 2004.2 AGIS Software reserves the right to establish an
`earlier date of invention based upon actions related to conception and reduction to practice of the
`claimed inventions.
`F. AGIS SOFTWARE’S OWN PRODUCTS
`Pursuant to P.R. 3-1(f), AGIS Software contends that AGIS, Inc.’s LifeRing products are
`covered by at least one of claim 7 of the ’728 Patent; claims 9, 12-16 of the ’724 Patent; claims 2,
`10-13 of the ’970 Patent; claims 1-31 of the ’100 Patent; and claims 1-26 of the ’838 Patent. AGIS
`Software’s investigation is ongoing and AGIS Software reserves the right to supplement, amend, or
`amend these contentions in view of facts learned during discovery, the release of new products, or
`the modification of current products, and/or the Court’s claim construction.
`
`
`2 AGIS continues to rely on interim priority dates identified in each of the Patents-in-Suit to establish
`priority prior to the actual filing date of the Patents-in-Suit (e.g., interim priority date April 17, 2006
`
`
`4
`which corresponds to the filing date of U.S. Patent No. 7,630,724).
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO LYFT’S JURISDICTIONAL 30(b)(6) NOTICE
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`G. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE
`3-2
`
`AGIS Software is producing or making available for inspection documents that are in AGIS
`Software’s possession, custody, or control as set forth in Patent Local Rule 3-2. An AGIS Software
`3-2 Production Index identifying these documents is attached hereto.
`This preliminary identification of documents is for convenience and is not an admission that
`each document falls within any exemplary categories in the Patent Local Rules, or that any
`document qualifies as prior art. AGIS Software is continuing with its investigation, particularly
`with respect to ESI. Thus, AGIS Software reserves its right to add to, delete from, or otherwise
`modify its disclosures in this section as its investigation proceeds.
`Production of these documents is governed by Patent Local Rule 2-2, and, with the exception
`of documents produced pursuant to P.R. 3.2(c) and public documents listed in the infringement
`charts, are considered “Confidential – Outside Attorneys Eyes Only” and disclosure of the
`confidential document or information shall be limited to each party’s outside attorney(s) of record
`and the employees of such outside attorney(s).
`
`DATED: April 18, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`By: /s/ Benjamin T. Wang
`
`
` Benjamin T. Wang
`
`FABRICANT LLP
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`5
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO LYFT’S JURISDICTIONAL 30(b)(6) NOTICE
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 104-1 Filed 04/18/22 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certified that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served via electronic mail on February __,March 18, 2022, to all counsel of
`record.
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`DATED: February __,March 18,
`2022
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Benjamin T. Wang
` Benjamin T. Wang
`
`
`6
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO LYFT’S JURISDICTIONAL 30(b)(6) NOTICE
`5:21-cv-04653-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`