throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 102-1 Filed 04/15/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`Arya Moshiri (SBN 324231)
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Ste. 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`Kurt M. Pankratz (pro hac vice)
`Bethany R. Salpietra (pro hac vice)
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.953.6500
`Facsimile: 214.953.6503
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`DECLARATION OF JEREMY J.
`TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
`LYFT, INC.’S RESPONSE TO
`DEFENDANT AGIS SOFTWARE
`DEVELOPMENT LLC’S MOTION FOR
`LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO
`PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-6
`
`Date: June 2, 2022
`Time: 10:00 a.m.
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Trial Date: October 16, 2023
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`TAYLOR DECL. ISO LYFT’S RESPONSE TO AGIS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 102-1 Filed 04/15/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`I, Jeremy J. Taylor, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am over the age of 21 and am fully competent to make this declaration. I have
`personal knowledge of all facts recited herein and state that such facts are true and correct to my
`knowledge or information and belief, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently about
`them.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P., 101 California St., Ste. 3600,
`2.
`San Francisco, CA 94111, and I represent Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) in the above-captioned action. I submit
`this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend
`Infringement Contentions.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a document incorporating screenshots from true and
`3.
`correct copies of AGIS Software’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions,
`served on Lyft in AGIS Software Dev. LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-72 (E.D. Tex.)
`(“EDTX Action”) on May 19, 2021, and AGIS Software’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`Infringement Contentions, served on Lyft in this case on February 25, 2022.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email from Jeremy
`4.
`Taylor to AGIS’s counsel, sent on July 21, 2021.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of correspondence from
`5.
`Bethany Salpietra to Vincent Rubino, counsel for AGIS, sent on August 6, 2021.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of AGIS Software’s First
`6.
`Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, served on Lyft in the EDTX
`Action on September 27, 2021.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of correspondence from
`7.
`Bethany Salpietra to Vincent Rubino, counsel for AGIS, sent on October 5, 2021.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of AGIS Software’s Second
`8.
`Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, served on Lyft in the EDTX
`Action on November 3, 2021.
`
`TAYLOR DECL. ISO LYFT’S RESPONSE TO AGIS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`1
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04653-BLF Document 102-1 Filed 04/15/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Lyft’s Motion to Strike
`9.
`AGIS’s First Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions in the EDTX
`Action, filed on November 3, 2021.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Order by Judge Gilstrap
`10.
`issued on January 19, 2022, in the EDTX Action.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Transcript of Case
`11.
`Management Conference from January 27, 2022.
`Executed on this 15 day of April, 2022, at San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty
`of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to
`the best of my knowledge.
`
`Dated: April 15, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lyft, Inc.
`
`TAYLOR DECL. ISO LYFT’S RESPONSE TO AGIS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`2
`
`CASE No. 5:21-cv-04653-BLF (SVK)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket