Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 890 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (SBN 191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (SBN 260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`+1 415 773 5700
`Facsimile:
`+1 415 773 5759
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`+1 312 754 0002
`Facsimile:
`+1 312 754 0003
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
`v.
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Defendant and Counter-Claimant.
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Consolidated with
`Case No. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA
`SONOS, INC.’S NOTICE OF REFILING
`OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
`OMNIBUS ORDER RE FINAL
`MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 889)
`
`SONOS, INC.’S NOTICE OF REFILING OF
`DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE OMNIBUS ORDER
`RE FINAL MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 889)
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 890 Filed 05/02/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”) hereby provides this Notice in response to the Court’s Omnibus
`Order Re Final Motions to Seal (Dkt. No. 889) (“Final Omnibus Order”).
`On February 9, 2024, the Court entered an order regarding Sonos’s and Google LLC’s
`(“Google”) remaining omnibus motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 831, 851). Sonos’s omnibus motion
`was granted in its entirety. Google’s omnibus motion was granted in part and denied in part. For
`the documents for which there is an overlapping sealing request by both parties (“Overlapping
`Documents”) the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to prepare redacted/excerpted
`versions that comply with the Court’s order.
`Counsel for Sonos and counsel for Google conferred on the refiling of the Overlapping
`Documents. Sonos provided Google with versions of the Overlapping Documents that redact the
`portions of those documents that Sonos moved to seal, and which the Court granted. Google
`returned the Overlapping Documents to Sonos with additional redactions, which Sonos
`understands reflect the portions of those documents that Google moved to seal and for which the
`Court granted Google’s sealing request. Sonos has not independently audited Google’s
`redactions for compliance with the Court’s Final Omnibus Order, and trusts that Google’s
`redactions comply with the order. A summary of those documents appears in the table below.
`In total, Sonos sought leave to seal seventeen documents or portions of documents. Six of
`those documents consist of duplicate filings of the same single document that Sonos sought to
`seal in its entirety (which the Court granted)—specifically, the Proposed Term Sheet previously
`filed at Dkt. Nos. 831-4, 831-5, 831-14, 831-15, 831-19, 831-20. Pursuant to the Court’s Final
`Omnibus Order, Sonos is not filing a redacted or public copy of that document, which remains
`sealed in its entirety.
`With respect to the remaining eleven documents for which Sonos sought sealing only in
`part—which the Court granted—there are only four unique documents. All of those documents
`are Overlapping Documents (i.e., documents for which Google also sought sealing in part, which
`the Court granted in part). To avoid unnecessary duplicate filings of the same unique document,
`Sonos is refiling one redacted version of each of the four unique documents. The table below
`
`1
`
`SONOS, INC.’S NOTICE OF REFILING OF
`DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE OMNIBUS ORDER
`RE FINAL MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 889)
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 890 Filed 05/02/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`outlines the four unique documents that Sonos is refiling in compliance with this Court’s Final
`Omnibus Order—after meeting and conferring with Google—which together span the eleven
`Overlapping Documents for which Sonos sought (and the Court granted) sealing in part (and for
`which Google also sought sealing in part, which the Court granted in part). The leftmost column
`(yellow) shows all eleven docket numbers for which Sonos sought sealing with respect to this
`tranche of documents. The rightmost column (blue) shows the unique document name (of which
`there are four total) with which each of the eleven docket numbers corresponds. The center
`column (no shading) shows each corresponding docket number for which Google sought sealing,
`which the Court granted in part in the Court’s Final Omnibus Order. The remaining columns
`(second from left (green) and second from right (orange)) show the docket numbers associated
`with the parties’ earlier filings of the same documents provisionally under seal.
`List of documents for which Sonos is now filing public redacted versions:
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per Court’s
`Final
`Omnibus
`Order Re
`Sonos
`831-6
`831-10
`831-161
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per
`Sonos’s
`Renewed
`Mot.
`(Dkt. 831)
`589-4
`590-4
`643-1
`
`Dkt. Nos. Per
`Court’s
`Final
`Omnibus
`Order Re
`Google
`854-5
`854-19
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per
`Google’s
`Renewed
`Mot.
`(Dkt. 851)
`590-4
`643-1
`
`831-7
`831-11
`831-8
`831-12
`831-17
`
`589-5
`590-5
`589-6
`590-6
`643-2
`
`854-6
`
`854-20
`
`590-5
`
`643-2
`
`UNIQUE DOCUMENT
`
`Excerpt of Bakewell Rebuttal Expert
`Report
`
`[Exhibit B to the Kolker Declaration
`in support of Sonos’s Motion In
`Limine No. 1]
`Google’s Response to Motion In
`Limine No. 1
`Excerpt of Malackowski
`Supplemental Expert Report
`
`[Exhibit 1 to the Cooper Declaration
`in support of Google’s Response to
`Motion In Limine No. 1]
`
`1 The Court indicated in its Final Omnibus Order that Dkt. No. 831-16 is the Proposed Term
`Sheet. It is actually an excerpt of the Bakewell Rebuttal Expert Report.
`SONOS, INC.’S NOTICE OF REFILING OF
`DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE OMNIBUS ORDER
`RE FINAL MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 889)
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`2
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 890 Filed 05/02/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per Court’s
`Final
`Omnibus
`Order Re
`Sonos
`831-9
`831-13
`831-18
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per
`Sonos’s
`Renewed
`Mot.
`(Dkt. 831)
`589-7
`590-7
`643-3
`
`Dkt. Nos. Per
`Court’s
`Final
`Omnibus
`Order Re
`Google
`854-21
`
`Dkt. Nos.
`Per
`Google’s
`Renewed
`Mot.
`(Dkt. 851)
`643-3
`
`UNIQUE DOCUMENT
`
`Excerpt of Bakewell Rebuttal Expert
`Report
`
`[Exhibit 2 to the Cooper Declaration
`in support of Google’s Response to
`Motion In Limine No. 1]
`
`Dated: May 2, 2024
`
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`and
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`
`By: /s/ Joseph R. Kolker
`Joseph R. Kolker
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`3
`
`SONOS, INC.’S NOTICE OF REFILING OF
`DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE OMNIBUS ORDER
`RE FINAL MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 889)
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`