throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 882 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (SBN 191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (SBN 260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`+1 415 773 5700
`Facsimile:
`+1 415 773 5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`J. DAN SMITH (pro hac vice)
`smith@ ls3ip.com
`MICHAEL P. BOYEA (pro hac vice)
`boyea@ ls3ip.com
`COLE B. RICHTER (pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`+1 312 754 0002
`Facsimile:
`+1 312 754 0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
` seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
` Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
` imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Attorneys for GOOGLE, LLC
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and Counter-defendant,
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`Consolidated with
`Case No. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant and Counter-claimant.
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
`TIME FOR SONOS, INC. TO OBJECT
`TO GOOGLE LLC’S BILL OF COSTS
`
`Judge: Hon. William Alsup
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
` 1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 882 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
` 1
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”) and Defendant Google LLC
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`(“Google”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby submit the following joint stipulation as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment “in favor of Google LLC and against Sonos,
`
`Inc.” in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA) (“Transferred Action”) on October
`
`10, 2023 (Transferred Action, Dkt. 275);
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered “declaratory relief . . . in favor of Google LLC and against
`
`Sonos, Inc. that: (1) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are unenforceable due
`
`to prosecution laches, and (2) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are invalid as
`
`anticipated by the accused products as measured by the adjusted priority date on account of new
`
`10
`
`matter having been inserted into the specification” in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:20-cv-
`
`11
`
`06754-WHA) (“Declaratory Judgment Action”) on October 10, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment
`
`12
`
`Action, Dkt. 869);
`
`13
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered an amended final judgment in favor of Google and against
`
`14
`
`Sonos on November 14, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment Action, Dkt. 880);
`
`15
`
`WHEREAS Local Rule 54-1 allows the prevailing party to file a bill of costs “[n]o later
`
`16
`
`than 14 days after entry of judgment”;
`
`17
`
`WHEREAS on October 21, 2023, the Court granted Google’s unopposed motion to
`
`18
`
`extend the deadline to file a bill of costs to November 7, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment Action,
`
`19
`
`Dkt. 872);
`
`20
`
`WHEREAS Google filed its bill of costs on November 7, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment
`
`21
`
`Action, Dkt. 876);
`
`22
`
`WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 54-2, Sonos’s objections to Google’s bill of costs are
`
`23
`
`due on November 21, 2023;
`
`24
`
`WHEREAS to allow sufficient time to meet and confer in an attempt to reach agreement
`
`25
`
`on the bill of costs, Sonos has asked for, and Google has agreed to, an extension of Sonos’s
`
`26
`
`deadline to file any objections to Google’s bill of costs until December 1, 2023;
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`WHEREAS there have been no prior stipulations to extend the time for Sonos to file any
`
`objections to Google’s bill of costs;
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 882 Filed 11/21/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
` 1
`
`WHEREAS the Parties do not expect that this change will impact any other deadlines in
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`the case;
`
`THE PARTIES HERE BY STIPULATE and jointly request that the Court extend the time
`
`for Sonos to object to Google’s bill of costs from November 21, 2023 to December 1, 2023.
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of Elizabeth Moulton in support hereof
`
`and respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`
`Dated: November 21, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`and
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`
`By: /s/ Elizabeth Moulton
`Elizabeth Moulton
`
` Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`By
`
`/s/ Lindsay Cooper
`Sean Pak
`Melissa Baily
`James D. Judah
`Lindsay Cooper
`Marc Kaplan
`Iman Lordgooei
`
`Attorneys for Google, LLC
`
`2
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 882 Filed 11/21/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`I, Elizabeth Moulton, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
`
`Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Sonos, Inc. to Object to Google
`
`LLC’s Bill of Costs. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Lindsay
`
`Cooper, counsel for Google, has concurred in this filing.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 21, 2023
`
`By: /s/ Elizabeth Moulton
` Elizabeth Moulton
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
` 1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 882 Filed 11/21/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: __________________, 2023
`
`_____________________________________
`Hon. William H. Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`4
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS
`3:20-CV-06754-WHA
`
` 1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket