Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 874 Filed 10/27/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
` seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
` Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
` imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (STATE
`BAR NO. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO.
`191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (STATE BAR NO.
`260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (admitted pro hac
`vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`(312) 754-0002
`Facsimile:
`(312) 754-0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Consolidated with Case No. 3:21-cv-07559-
`WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
`EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR
`ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 874 Filed 10/27/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Civil Local Rule 6-2, Google LLC
`
`2
`
`(“Google”) and Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”) (collectively, “Parties”) jointly stipulate and request an order
`
`3
`
`extending the deadline for motions for attorneys’ fees to thirty (30) days after the conclusion of all
`
`4
`
`appellate review, including resolution of any petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by
`
`5
`
`the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and/or petitions for a writ of certiorari from the United
`
`6
`
`States Supreme Court.
`
`7
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment “in favor of Google LLC and against Sonos, Inc.”
`
`8
`
`in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA) (“Transferred Action”) on October 10,
`
`9
`
`2023 (Transferred Action, Dkt. 275);
`
`10
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered “declaratory relief . . . in favor of Google LLC and against
`
`11
`
`Sonos, Inc. that: (1) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are unenforceable due to
`
`12
`
`prosecution laches, and (2) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are invalid as
`
`13
`
`anticipated by the accused products as measured by the adjusted priority date on account of new
`
`14
`
`matter having been inserted into the specification” in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:20-cv-
`
`15
`
`06754-WHA) (“Declaratory Judgment Action”) on October 10, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment
`
`16
`
`Action, Dkt. 869);
`
`17
`
`WHEREAS, Sonos filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on October 17, 2023
`
`18
`
`(Declaratory Judgment Action, Dkt. 870);
`
`19
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted Google’s unopposed administrative motion to extend the
`
`20
`
`deadline for its motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 285 and bill of costs and “invite[d]
`
`21
`
`a stipulation that any fees motion will be made only after all appellate review is exhausted” on
`
`22
`
`October 21, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment Action, Dkt. 872);
`
`23
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE, AND REQUEST, that the Court extend
`
`24
`
`the deadline for motions for attorneys’ fees to thirty (30) days after the conclusion of all appellate
`
`25
`
`review, including resolution of any petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by the Court
`
`26
`
`of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and/or petitions for a writ of certiorari from the United States
`
`27
`
`Supreme Court.
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`1
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 874 Filed 10/27/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`1
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of Lindsay Cooper in support hereof and
`
`2
`
`respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: October 26, 2023
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Clement Roberts
`Attorneys for SONOS, INC.
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`
`Counsel for Google LLC
`
`Counsel for Sonos, Inc.
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`2
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 874 Filed 10/27/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, Sean Pak, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`3
`
`Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Clement Roberts, counsel
`
`4
`
`for Sonos, has concurred in this filing.
`
`Dated: October 26, 2023
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`Sean Pak
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`3
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 874 Filed 10/27/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`October 27, 2023.
`DATED: ___________________
`
` By:
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`4
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`