throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 873 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
` seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
` Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
` imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`
` CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (STATE
`BAR NO. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO.
`191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (STATE BAR NO.
`260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (admitted pro hac
`vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`(312) 754-0002
`Facsimile:
`(312) 754-0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Consolidated with Case No. 3:21-cv-07559-
`WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
`EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR
`ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 873 Filed 10/26/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Civil Local Rule 6-2, Google LLC
`
`2
`
`(“Google”) and Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”) (collectively, “Parties”) jointly stipulate and request an order
`
`3
`
`extending the deadline for motions for attorneys’ fees to thirty (30) days after the conclusion of all
`
`4
`
`appellate review, including resolution of any petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by
`
`5
`
`the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and/or petitions for a writ of certiorari from the United
`
`6
`
`States Supreme Court.
`
`7
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment “in favor of Google LLC and against Sonos, Inc.”
`
`8
`
`in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA) (“Transferred Action”) on October 10,
`
`9
`
`2023 (Transferred Action, Dkt. 275);
`
`10
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered “declaratory relief . . . in favor of Google LLC and against
`
`11
`
`Sonos, Inc. that: (1) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are unenforceable due to
`
`12
`
`prosecution laches, and (2) United States Patent Nos. 10,848,885 and 10,469,966 are invalid as
`
`13
`
`anticipated by the accused products as measured by the adjusted priority date on account of new
`
`14
`
`matter having been inserted into the specification” in Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC (No. 3:20-cv-
`
`15
`
`06754-WHA) (“Declaratory Judgment Action”) on October 10, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment
`
`16
`
`Action, Dkt. 869);
`
`17
`
`WHEREAS, Sonos filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on October 17, 2023
`
`18
`
`(Declaratory Judgment Action, Dkt. 870);
`
`19
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted Google’s unopposed administrative motion to extend the
`
`20
`
`deadline for its motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 285 and bill of costs and “invite[d]
`
`21
`
`a stipulation that any fees motion will be made only after all appellate review is exhausted” on
`
`22
`
`October 21, 2023 (Declaratory Judgment Action, Dkt. 872);
`
`23
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE, AND REQUEST, that the Court extend
`
`24
`
`the deadline for motions for attorneys’ fees to thirty (30) days after the conclusion of all appellate
`
`25
`
`review, including resolution of any petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by the Court
`
`26
`
`of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and/or petitions for a writ of certiorari from the United States
`
`27
`
`Supreme Court.
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`1
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 873 Filed 10/26/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of Lindsay Cooper in support hereof and
`
`2
`
`respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: October 26, 2023
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`Counsel for Google LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Clement Roberts
`Attorneys for SONOS, INC.
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`
`Counsel for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`2
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 873 Filed 10/26/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, Sean Pak, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`3
`
`Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Clement Roberts, counsel
`
`4
`
`for Sonos, has concurred in this filing.
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 26, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`Sean Pak
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`3
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 873 Filed 10/26/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`DATED: ___________________, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`4
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES DEADLINE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket