`
`
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
` Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
` seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
` Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
` imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
` Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Consolidated with Case No. 3:21-cv-07559-
`WHA
`
`GOOGLE LLC’S UNOPPOSED
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`EXTEND DEADLINES FOR MOTION
`FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND BILL
`OF COSTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`GOOGLE’S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR
`ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 871 Filed 10/20/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to L.R. 6-3, Google LLC (“Google”) respectfully moves for an order extending the
`
`2
`
`deadline for Google’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 285 and bill of costs. Since
`
`3
`
`receiving the Court’s judgment (Dkt. 869), Google and Google’s counsel have worked diligently to
`
`4
`
`prepare Google’s motion for attorneys’ fees and bill of costs. However, Google requests additional
`
`5
`
`time to ensure that its requests are as narrowly tailored as possible and afford the parties sufficient
`
`6
`
`time to meet and confer and minimize any disputes raised to the Court. Without an extension,
`
`7
`
`Google will be substantially harmed if it is unable to thoroughly analyze each request for fees and
`
`8
`
`costs. Since this Court has held that “overreach for fees warrants denial,” Google could be
`
`9
`
`prejudiced if it submits an over-inclusive request to the Court. In re Glob. Equity Mgmt. (SA) Pty.
`
`10
`
`Ltd., No. C 17-02177 WHA, 2020 WL 4732210, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2020).
`
`11
`
`Accordingly, Google requests that the Court extend the deadline for Google to file its motion
`
`12
`
`for attorneys’ fees and bill of costs from October 24, 2023 to November 7, 2023.1 This proposed
`
`13
`
`schedule would not affect the parties’ ability to comply with the other deadlines set forth in this
`
`14
`
`case. Declaration of Lindsay Cooper ¶ 7. Sonos does not oppose Google’s motion. Id.
`
`
`
`DATED: October 20, 2023
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`Sean Pak
`Melissa Baily
`James Judah
`Lindsay Cooper
`Marc Kaplan
`Iman Lordgooei
`
`
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`By
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), Google intends to move to amend the Court’s
`judgment to reflect the disposition of all the parties’ claims and defenses. Extending the deadline
`for Google’s motion for attorneys’ fees and bill of costs will ensure that all three filings are due on
`the same day.
`
`
`-1-
`GOOGLE’S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR
`ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
