throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 547 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
` charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC
`
`CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (STATE
`BAR NO. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO.
`191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (STATE BAR NO.
`260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (admitted pro hac
`vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`(312) 754-0002
`Facsimile:
`(312) 754-0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`GOOGLE LLC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Related to CASE NO. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
`SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL
`DEADLINES WITH ORDER AS
`AMENDED
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`01980-00181/13926381.2
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL DEADLINES
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 547 Filed 03/09/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Google LLC (“Google”) and Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”) jointly
`
`2
`
`stipulate and request an order setting a pretrial exchange schedule.
`
`3
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred in good faith and agreed, subject to the
`
`4
`
`Court’s approval, that their proposed schedule for pretrial exchanges will facilitate the resolution of
`
`5
`
`pretrial disclosure disputes before the deadline for the proposed pretrial order;
`
`6
`
`WHEREAS, the proposed deadlines below are either not set, or earlier than those set, by the
`
`7
`
`Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases Before the Honorable William
`
`8
`
`Alsup (the “Guidelines”), with the exception of the deadline for the parties to serve oppositions to
`
`9
`
`motions in limine;
`
`10
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties propose and agree to exchanging oppositions to motions in limine
`
`11
`
`on April 24, 2023 at 10 p.m. P.T. instead of the April 21, 2022 deadline set by the Guidelines to
`
`12
`
`ensure that the parties have adequate time to respond to multiple motions, including Daubert
`
`13
`
`motions pursuant to the Court’s Order re Daubert Motions (Dkt. 291);
`
`14
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the new proposed deadline to exchange oppositions to
`
`15
`
`motions in limine deadline will not affect the date on which they are filed with the Court;
`
`16
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agree that their proposed schedule for pretrial exchanges will not
`
`17
`
`affect the Parties’ ability to comply with the other deadlines set forth in this case;
`
`18
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE, AND REQUEST, that the Court modify
`
`19
`
`pretrial deadlines as follows:
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Event
`
`Current Deadline1
`
`Proposed Deadline
`
`Sonos to serve drafts of pretrial order
`materials (i.e., joint pretrial order, jury
`instructions, verdict form, voir dire,
`juror questionnaire)
`
`Parties to exchange pretrial disclosures
`required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)
`(except for deposition designations)
`
`N/A
`
`April 3, 2023
`
`April 8, 2023
`
`April 3, 2023
`
`1 See Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases Before the
`Honorable William Alsup.
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`1
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL DEADLINES
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 547 Filed 03/09/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`Parties to exchange lists of potential
`motions in limine on which agreement
`may be reached
`
`Google to serve redlines for jury
`instructions
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Parties to serve motions in limine
`
`April 13, 2023
`
`April 5, 2023, with
`mutual exchange at 10
`p.m. PT
`
`April 12, 2023
`
`April 13, 2023, with
`mutual exchange at 10
`p.m. PT
`
`Google to serve redlines of all draft
`pretrial order materials (i.e., joint
`pretrial order, verdict form, voir dire,
`juror questionnaire)
`
`Parties to serve objections pursuant to
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B)
`
`N/A
`
`April 14, 2023
`
`April 22, 2023
`
`April 17, 2023
`
`Parties to identify any topics on which
`they will file trial briefs
`
`N/A
`
`Parties to serve oppositions to motions
`in limine
`
`April 21, 2023
`
`Parties to exchange jury instruction legal
`memoranda
`
`N/A
`
`Parties to file joint proposed pretrial
`order materials, motions in limine with
`oppositions, memoranda of law
`regarding jury instructions, and optional
`trial briefs
`
`April 26, 2023
`
`April 21, 2023, with
`mutual exchange at 10
`p.m. PT
`
`April 24, 2023, with
`mutual exchange at 10
`p.m. PT
`April 22, 2023, with
`mutual exchange at 10
`p.m. PT
`April 26, 2023
`(no change)
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of Jocelyn Ma in support hereof and
`
`respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: March 8, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`/s/ Clement Seth Roberts
`Attorneys for SONOS, INC.
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`
`Counsel for Google LLC
`
`Counsel for Sonos, Inc.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`2
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL DEADLINES
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 547 Filed 03/09/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, Charles K. Verhoeven, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`3
`
`this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Clement Roberts,
`
`4
`
`counsel for Sonos, has concurred in this filing.
`
`Dated: March 8, 2023
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`3
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL DEADLINES
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 547 Filed 03/09/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`The parties shall please limit motions in limine to five per side and limit them to
`circumstances that really require a ruling in advance of opening statements. This is
`without prejudice to raising evidentiary issues on a daily basis as the trial progresses.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: ___________________, 2023. By:
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`4
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL DEADLINES
`
`March 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket