throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 434 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
` charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC
`
`
` CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (STATE
`BAR NO. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO.
`191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (STATE BAR NO.
`260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (admitted pro hac
`vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`(312) 754-0002
`Facsimile:
`(312) 754-0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Related to CASE NO. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
`EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR
`EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT
`REPORTS, AND DISPOSITIVE
`MOTIONS
`
`
`
`
`01980-00181/13798269.1
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT REPORTS,
`AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 434 Filed 12/22/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Google LLC (“Google”) and Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”)
`
`2
`
`(collectively, “Parties”) jointly stipulate and request an order extending the deadlines for expert
`
`3
`
`discovery, expert reports, and dispositive motions.
`
`4
`
`WHEREAS, Google filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to
`
`5
`
`Patent L.R. 3-6 (“Motion for Leave,” Dkt. 336) on August 30, 2022;
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`WHEREAS, non-expert discovery closed on November 30, 2022 (Dkt. 67);
`
`WHEREAS, opening expert reports were served on November 30, 2022 (id.);
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted Google’s Motion for Leave on December 8, 2022 (Dkt. 418);
`
`WHEREAS, during the hearing on Google’s Motion for Leave on December 8, 2022 , the
`
`10
`
`Court “allow[ed] Sonos to have the discovery that it needs on [] two [YouTube] engineers” in light
`
`11
`
`of the new amendments to Google’s invalidity contentions (Dkt. 425 at 32:1-2);
`
`12
`
`WHEREAS, the Court noted during the hearing that “[i]f this means that you need more
`
`13
`
`time on the opposition expert report, I will be favorably inclined to that” (id. at 32:7-8);
`
`14
`
`WHEREAS, the two YouTube engineers Sonos intends to depose live and work in
`
`15
`
`Switzerland, which requires the issuance of letters rogatory before any deposition, and are further
`
`16
`
`traveling on pre-planned Christmas vacations during the second half of December (Declaration of
`
`17
`
`James Judah ¶ 4);
`
`18
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred on a case schedule that would permit adequate
`
`19
`
`time to take the two depositions, consider them in rebuttal and reply expert reports, and address
`
`20
`
`them in dispositive motions (id. ¶ 5);
`
`21
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agree that continuing the deadlines for expert discovery, expert
`
`22
`
`reports, and dispositive motions will not affect the Parties’ ability to comply with the other deadlines
`
`23
`
`set forth in this case;
`
`24
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE, AND REQUEST, that the Court modify
`
`25
`
`the current expert discovery, expert report, and dispositive motion deadlines as follows:
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`1
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT REPORTS,
`AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 434 Filed 12/22/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Current Deadline
`
`Proposed Deadline
`
`Deadline for rebuttal expert
`reports
`
`Deadline for reply expert
`reports
`
`Deadline for bringing
`discovery motions or
`extension motions based on
`discovery violations for expert
`discovery
`
`Deadline for expert discovery
`
`Deadline for dispositive
`motions
`
`
`
`
`December 23, 2022 (Dkt. 402) January 13, 2023
`
`January 5, 2023 (Dkt. 402)
`
`January 23, 2023
`
`January 13, 2023 (Dkt. 402)
`
`January 27, 2023
`
`January 20, 2023 (Dkt. 402)
`
`January 31, 2023
`
`January 26, 2023 (Dkt. 67)
`
`February 6, 2023
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of James Judah in support hereof and
`
`respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 21, 2022
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`Counsel for Google LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Sean Sullivan
`Attorneys for SONOS, INC.
`
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`
`
`Counsel for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`2
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT REPORTS,
`AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 434 Filed 12/22/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, Charles K. Verhoeven, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`3
`
`this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Sean Sullivan,
`
`4
`
`counsel for Sonos, has concurred in this filing.
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 21, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`3
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT REPORTS,
`AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 434 Filed 12/22/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`December 22
`DATED: ___________________, 2022 By:
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`4
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY, EXPERT REPORTS,
`AND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket