throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 417 Filed 12/07/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
` Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
` charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
` Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)
` melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
` James Judah (Bar No. 257112)
` jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
` Lindsay Cooper (Bar No. 287125)
` lindsaycooper@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
` Marc Kaplan (pro hac vice)
` marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 2700
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC
`
`
` CLEMENT SETH ROBERTS (STATE
`BAR NO. 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`BAS DE BLANK (STATE BAR NO.
`191487)
`basdeblank@orrick.com
`ALYSSA CARIDIS (STATE BAR NO.
`260103)
`acaridis@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`SEAN M. SULLIVAN (admitted pro hac
`vice)
`sullivan@ls3ip.com
`COLE RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
`richter@ls3ip.com
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`656 W Randolph St., Floor 5W
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Telephone:
`(312) 754-0002
`Facsimile:
`(312) 754-0003
`
`Attorneys for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`Related to CASE NO. 3:21-cv-07559-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
`EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
`GOOGLE LLC’S OPPOSITION TO
`SONOS, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
`TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO
`PATENT L.R. 3-6
`
`
`
`
`01980-00181/13763902.1
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR GOOGLE’S OPPOSITION TO SONOS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 417 Filed 12/07/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Google LLC (“Google”) and Sonos, Inc. (“Sonos”)
`
`2
`
`(collectively, the “Parties”) jointly stipulate and request an order extending the deadline for
`
`3
`
`Google’s Opposition to Sonos’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Pursuant to
`
`4
`
`Patent L.R. 3-6 (“Motion to Amend,” Dkt. 407) (“Opposition”).
`
`5
`
`WHEREAS, Sonos’s Motion to Amend was filed on November 23, 2022, the day before
`
`6
`
`Thanksgiving;
`
`7
`
`WHEREAS, Sonos did not serve sealed Exhibits 1, 4, 8, and 9 to Sonos’s Motion to Amend
`
`8
`
`until November 28, 2022;
`
`9
`
`10
`
`WHEREAS, Google’s Opposition is due on December 7, 2022;
`
`WHEREAS, Google has agreed not to object to or oppose a Sonos request to supplement the
`
`11
`
`briefing and hearing record concerning Google’s motion for leave to amend its ’033 invalidity
`
`12
`
`contentions (Dkt. 336) in the event Google takes contradictory positions in its opposition to Dkt.
`
`13
`
`407;
`
`14
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agree that continuing the deadline for Google’s Opposition will not
`
`15
`
`affect the Parties’ ability to comply with the other deadlines set forth in this case;
`
`16
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE, AND REQUEST, that the Court extend
`
`17
`
`the deadline for Google’s Opposition to December 12, 2022.
`
`18
`
`The Parties submit the accompanying declaration of James Judah in support hereof and
`
`19
`
`respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: December 6, 2022
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Attorneys for GOOGLE LLC
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`Counsel for Google LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Cole Richter
`Attorneys for SONOS, INC.
`
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`
`
`Counsel for Sonos, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`1
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR GOOGLE’S OPPOSITION TO SONOS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 417 Filed 12/07/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, Charles K. Verhoeven, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`
`3
`
`this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Cole Richter,
`
`4
`
`counsel for Sonos, has concurred in this filing.
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 6, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`2
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR GOOGLE’S OPPOSITION TO SONOS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06754-WHA Document 417 Filed 12/07/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`December 7
`DATED: ___________________, 2022 By:
`
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-06754-WHA
`3
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR GOOGLE’S OPPOSITION TO SONOS’S
`MOTION TO AMEND
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket