`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.
`
`Plaintiff, Counter-defendant
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APPLE INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`REQUESTING GUIDANCE REGARDING
`EVIDENTIARY HEARING
`
`Defendant, Counterclaimant
`
`The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed an Administrative Motion
`Requesting Guidance Regarding Evidentiary Hearing (“Motion”). In response to Apple’s Motion, the
`Court ACCEPTS the position on the order of the hearing presentation set forth by:
`___ Apple
`X
`___ Epic Games, Inc.
`
`Epic Games bears the burden and therefore should proceed first. For
`efficiency purposes, if a witness is called by Epic Games, Apple's
`examination of that witness should include any direct examination that
`Apple would have conducted.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`May 2
`
`, 2024
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APPLE INC.’S
`REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE
`
`
`_________________________________
`The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`United States District Court Judge
`CASE NO. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR
`
`1
`
`
`1 1
`
`2 2
`
`3 3
`
`4 4
`
`5 5
`
`6 6
`
`7 7
`
`8 8
`
`9 9
`
`10 10
`
`11 11
`
`12 12
`
`13 13
`
`14 14
`
`15 15
`
`16 16
`
`17 17
`
`18 18
`
`19 19
`
`20 20
`
`21 21
`
`22 22
`
`23 23
`
`24 24
`
`25 25
`
`26 26
`
`27 27
`
`28 28
`
`