throbber
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 825 Filed 10/22/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Paul J. Riehle (SBN 115199)
`paul.riehle@faegredrinker.com
`FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`Four Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 591-7500
`Facsimile: (415) 591-7510
`
`Christine A. Varney (pro hac vice)
`cvarney@cravath.com
`Katherine B. Forrest (pro hac vice)
`kforrest@cravath.com
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)
`yeven@cravath.com
`Lauren A. Moskowitz (pro hac vice)
`lmoskowitz@cravath.com
`Justin C. Clarke (pro hac vice)
`jcclarke@cravath.com
`M. Brent Byars (pro hac vice)
`mbyars@cravath.com
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Epic Games, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and Counter-defendant,
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant and Counterclaimant.
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`DECLARATION OF M. BRENT BYARS
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
`EPIC GAMES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S MOTION
`FOR STAY OF INJUNCTION PENDING
`APPEAL
`
`Date: Nov. 16, 2021, 2 p.m. (noticed date)
`
`Nov. 9, 2021, 2 p.m. (stipulated date
`pending Court approval)
`
`Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor
`
`Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers
`
`DECLARATION OF M. BRENT BYARS
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 825 Filed 10/22/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I, M. Brent Byars, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, and am one of
`
`the attorneys representing Epic Games, Inc. (“Epic”) in this action. I am admitted to appear
`
`before this Court pro hac vice.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of Epic’s Opposition to Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”)
`
`Motion for Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal. The contents of this declaration are based on my
`
`personal knowledge. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an article by Chance Miller,
`
`Apple describes Epic Games ruling as a ‘resounding victory’ for the App Store, 9to5Mac
`
`(September 10, 2021), https://9to5mac.com/2021/09/10/apple-epic-games-ruling-statement/.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an article by Adi Robertson
`
`and Zoe Schiffer, Tim Cook tells Apple employees he’s ‘looking forward to moving forward’ after
`
`Epic ruling, The Verge (September 17, 2021), https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/17/2
`
`2679724/tim-cook-epic-apple-antitrust-ruling-employee-meeting.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a letter written by
`
`Gary A. Bornstein to Mark A. Perry dated September 14, 2021, with two redactions concerning
`
`sensitive information. The redactions that appear in this exhibit conceal solely Apple’s bank
`
`account and routing numbers.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter written by
`
`Gary A. Bornstein to Mark A. Perry dated September 12, 2021.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of an article written by Juli
`
`Clover, Epic Games Asks Apple to Restore Fortnite in South Korea Following Ban on In-App
`
`Purchase Requirement, MacRumors (September 9, 2021), https://www.macrumors.com/2
`
`021/09/09/epic-games-fortnite-south-korea/.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF M. BRENT BYARS
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 825 Filed 10/22/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit F is a collection of true and correct screenshots of the App
`
`Store pages for PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (“PUBG”), Mortal Kombat and Hello Neighbor,
`
`which show in-app purchase options. The table below lists the respective page numbers for each
`
`in the Exhibit. The screenshots were taken on October 18, 2021 and October 19, 2021.
`
`App
`
`PUBG
`
`Mortal Kombat
`
`Hello Neighbor
`
`Exhibit Pages
`
`1-2
`
`3-4
`
`5-6
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit G is an article by Chance Ivey, Hello Neighbor Mod Kit
`
`Released, Mod Contest Announced, Unreal Engine (October 6, 2017), https://www.unrealengine
`
`.com/en-US/blog/hello-neighbor-mod-kit-released-mod-contest-announced.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit H is a collection of true and correct screenshots of the App
`
`Store pages for Unreal Remote, Unreal Remote 2, Unreal Match 3, Action RPG Game Sample,
`
`Live Link Face and Live Link VCAM. The table below lists the respective page numbers for each
`
`in the Exhibit. The screenshots were taken on October 18, 2021.
`
`App
`
`Exhibit Pages
`
`Unreal Remote
`
`Unreal Remote 2
`
`Unreal Match 3
`
`Action RPG Game
`Sample
`
`Live Link Face
`
`Live Link VCAM
`
`1-2
`
`3-4
`
`5-6
`
`7-8
`
`9-10
`
`11-12
`
`11.
`
`Attached as Exhibit I is an article by Kate Park, Epic Games asks Apple to
`
`reinstate Fortnite in South Korea after new law, TechCrunch (September 9, 2021), https:/
`
`/techcrunch.com/2021/09/09/epic-games-asks-apple-to-reinstate-fortnite-in-south-korea-after-
`
`new-law/.
`
`12.
`
`Attached as Exhibit J is an article by Michael Potuck, Spotify happy with Epic vs.
`
`Apple ruling but says more Apple legislation is ‘urgent’, 9to5Mac (September 10, 2021),
`
`https://9to5mac.com/2021/09/10/spotify-happy-epic-vs-apple-ruling-wants-more-apple-
`
`legislation/.
`
`DECLARATION OF M. BRENT BYARS
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 825 Filed 10/22/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Attached as Exhibit K is a collection of tweets from Zach Shakked
`
`(@zachshakked) dated September 11, 2021, https://twitter.com/zachshakked/status/14367932
`
`58471051264, and from Denys Zhadanov (@DenZhadanov) dated September 10, 2021,
`
`https://twitter.com/DenZhadanov/status/1436462992028311584.
`
`14.
`
`Attached as Exhibit L is an article by Joyce Lee, S. Korea targets Apple over new
`
`app store regulation, Reuters (October 15, 2021), https://www.reuters.com/technology/skorea-
`
`targets-apple-over-new-app-store-regulation-2021-10-15/.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
`
`and correct and that I executed this declaration on October 22, 2021 in New York, New York.
`
`
`/s/ M. Brent Byars
`M. Brent Byars
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF M. BRENT BYARS
`
`4
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket