throbber
Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 10
`
`Exhibit
`
`C
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`  
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 2 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Wmeefitemsdfiaflmw Page 2 of 10
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`
`
`POLICY —
`
`How Life360 won its patent war
`
`Jury saw CEO 5 Dear piece of shit" letter to his "patent troll"—and understood.
`
`JOE MULLIN - 3/19/2015, 4:50 PM
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`1/9
`
` 
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`  
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 3 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG WmEE—fiteflsdfiaflefiw Page 3 of 10
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`
`
`Life360 CEO Chris Hulls in his San Francisco office.
`
`In May 2014, Life360 CEO Chris Hulls received an aggressive patent demand letter. The letter, from
`
`lawyers representing a company called Advanced Ground Information Systems (AGIS), told him he
`
`needed to pay for a "royalty—bearing license" to its four patents, or Life360 and its customers would
`
`have to "cease and desist" from infringement.
`
`In other words: pay up, or shut down your company. The letter demanded a response within three
`
`days. Hulls wrote back:
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`2/9
`
` 
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`  
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 4 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG WmEE—fiteflsdmflefiaag Page 4 of 10
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`

`
`DELIVERED STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.
`
`Email address
`
`Will be used in accordance with our ”Baggy Policy
`
`Dear Piece ofShit,
`
`We are currently in the process of retaining counsel and investigating this matter. As a result,
`
`we will not be able to meet your Friday deadline. After reviewing this matter with our
`
`counsel, we will provide a prompt response.
`
`I will pray tonight that karma is real, and that you are its worthy recipient,
`
`Chris
`
`On that Friday, Life360 got sued. The lawyers attached Hulls‘ "Dear Piece of Shit" letter as an exhibit.
`
`What AGIS' lawyers could not have known is that they'd picked out one of the few small companies
`
`that wasn't going to back down from a patent fight—and Hulls wasn't going to play by the usual
`
`rules. Life360 was supposed to be their "easy" target. The lawyers, from a top IP law firm called
`
`Kenyon & Kenyon, had plans to hunt bigger game later—they had also sent (more nicely worded)
`
`patent threat letters to Google, Facebook, and Foursquare.
`
`What Hulls couldn't have known is that in less than a year, he'd be in front ofa jury, explaining his
`
`"Dear Piece of Shit" missive to an eight-person jury in faraway Florida. It wouldn't be easy. And AGIS
`
`was no typical "patent troll," but a small company thatjust hadn't managed to be profitable.
`
`Still, he was in a unique position where he was ready and able to fight back. Life360 had just got a
`
`third round offunding, $50 million, and he had a board who would support him. When the company
`
`was younger and smaller, he'd had to pay off patent trolls—more than once. "If you have $3 million in
`
`decently, I have this lawyer trying to steal from me," he said.
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
`the bank, can you really risk a suit that's going to be one million, when you could make it go away for
`
`$100,000?" he said in an interview with Ars. "Every time we wrote that check, my soul died a little bit."
`
`Hulls had worked for years with little or no salary. "Now, right when I'm finally starting to pay myself
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`3/9
`
` 
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 5 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG WmEE—fiteflsdmflefidag Page 5 of 10
`
`“Circles" and “LifeRing”
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`  
`
`Life360 offers a service called "Circles" that allows family and friends to see each other on a map and
`
`send group messages. It's a service that answers the age-old question of "where are your friends and
`
`family, and what are they up to?" It‘s far from a new idea.
`
`AGIS sells "LifeRing," which it markets to military and police clients. It also allows clients to view
`
`themselves on a map and contact each other.
`
`The two companies have never been competitors. Life360 offers its app for free on Android and
`
`iPhone and charges $5 a month to "premium" users who get extra features. AGIS, by
`
`contrast, competes for government contracts, sometimes connected to specific events. For instance,
`
`the Honolulu Police Department contracted with AGIS in 2011 to use its software during the Asia-
`
`Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.
`
`AGIS has made a few million dollars since it was founded more than a decade ago, but it has never
`
`had a profitable year. The company is run out of the home of its founder, Malcolm "Cap" Beyer, who
`
`lives in Jupiter, Florida. At some point in 2014, Beyer decided to look into enforcing some of its 13
`
`issued patents, the oldest of which has a 2004 filing date.
`
`Beyer hadn't heard of Life360 until last year, when a board member contacted him, suggesting that
`
`the company might be a good target for patent licensing. In May of that year, the company's lawyers
`
`sent the threat letter, which said Life360 had infringed four US patents, numbered 7,031,728,
`
`7,764,954, 8,126,441 and 7,672,681.
`
`A patent for calling people on a map
`
`AGIS claims its patents are infringed by very basic functions of the Life360 app, such as its ability
`
`to "allow a user to touch a family member's symbol on a map and initiate a rapid voice
`
`communication or text message."
`
`"We're getting sued for having markers on a map showing where people are and allowing
`
`communication between them," he told one reporter shortly after he was sued, adding that he could
`
`"show them a Star Trek episode from the 19605" that had a similar system.
`
`Knowing that AGIS was likely to pursue other companies, Life360 offered free legal support to any
`
`other startups AGIS might sue, including research on the patents and prior art. Hulls took other steps
`
`that patent defendants aren't "supposed" to do, like simply calling up the inventor whose patents
`
`he'd supposedly infringed and trying to initiate a discussion. But Beyer didn't even know who he was.
`
`Hulls also continued to speak publicly about his fight,
`
`creating a website called "Stop AGIS," in which
`
`he described his quest to create "a hostile environment
`
`in which troll—like behavior is no longer a financially
`
`viable way to operate."
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`4/9
`
`" 
`
`

`

`  
`
`3/18/2019
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 6 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG WmEE—fiteflsdmflefidag Page 6 of 10
`
`"AGIS may not be the exact definition of a troll, but the
`
`entity's behavior is eerily similar," Hulls wrote. "Perhaps
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`
`it‘s just a business struggling to stay afloat and
`
`grasping at any thread to stay alive."
`
`More provocatively, he also created a website with the
`
`name of AGIS' founder, malcolmbeyer.com. "If you
`
`supportjobs and innovation, we encourage you to
`
`investigate the actions of Malcolm K. Beyer and AGIS
`
`|nc.," the site states.
`
`[\C
`
`I III IJGI LILUIGI , VVI IUIII
`
`Hulls believes is the true driver behind the lawsuit. At
`
`one point, Hulls remembers Hannemann telling him
`
`that "for everyone else this is about money, but for you
`
`it's personal."
`
`"If we go to trial, I'm going to put you out of business,"
`
`SIGN IN
`
`
`
`Hannemann told Hulls after one required mediation
`
`session. (Hulls' lawyer confirmed the encounter
`
`happened; Hannemann didn't respond to questions
`
`about the discussion.)
`
`Life 360 app.
`
`He wasn‘t kidding. The companies weren't competitive, but shortly before trial AGIS suddenly created
`
`a "consumer app" for Android called HoundDog, which would increase their chances of getting an
`
`injunction if they won. (The app still wasn‘t available on the first day of trial, but at some point last
`
`week it went up on the Google Play store.)
`
`But trial was where it was headed. Hulls had every reason to roll the dice with a jury, because the
`
`payout Hannemann was demanding was massive. While he can't disclose offers from mediation,
`
`AGIS would shortly be asking a Florida jury to award it $3 million in damages.
`
`Life360 is still a relatively small company, with 60 employees working to build up its base of active
`
`users. "My morals aside, they made it easy for us to go to court, because the numbers are so big," he
`said.
`
`“This case is a collision"
`
`On March 8, Hulls and his co-founder Alex Haro flew to Florida for the week-long trial, which would
`
`be held in the federal courthouse in West Palm Beach, near AGIS' home office. The company had
`
`hired Kent Baldauf of the Pittsburg-based Webb law firm, whose team has a history of taking patent
`
`cases for determined troll-fighters, including Lee Cheng, the top lawyer for Newegg.
`
`US Districtjudge Donald Middlebrooks made several key rulingsjust before trial about what evidence
`
`would and would not come in. The "Dear Piece of Shit" letter, as a pre-trial communication, would be
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`5/9
`
`! 
`
`

`

`  
`
`3/18/2019
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 7 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185—HSG WmEE—fitefledpfiaflefiaag Page 7 of 10
`
`shown to the jury, Middlebrooks ruled. Baldauf knew he'd have to get
`
`out in front of that and planned to mention it during his opening
`statement.
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`
`I'This case is a collision," AGIS lawyer Mark Hannemann said in
`
`opening statements. "It is a collision between two creative, high-tech
`
`companies and two creative entrepreneurs who started those
`
`companies and drove them on."
`
`AGIS' software “turns your smartphone into basically a command and
`
`control center, right there in your hand," Hannemann said. Now, that
`
`is a good idea now and the companies are quite successful with it. But 3
`it was an even better idea back in 2004, and that's the perspective we :2;
`need to use to look at this case."
`‘1
`
`There was "no evidence at all" that Hulls had copied AGIS,
`
`Alex Ham,
`
`Hannemann acknowledged. But Life360 still needed to pay for its
`
`patents.
`
`Enlarge / Life360 co-founder
`
`"I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Beyer and Ms. Beyer throughout the course of this litigation," Kent
`
`Baldauf said during his opening for Life360. "They are very nice people. The fact that they are nice
`
`people and it is a nice story certainly doesn't mean that these patents are infringed. It doesn't mean
`
`that Life360 is liable for damages."
`
`Baldauf continued:
`
`There has been absolutely no competition between these companies. There is also
`
`testimony from Mr. Beyer that he said that the only time he is really sure that he first
`
`positively learned about Life360 was when they were identified by their lawyers. Letters were
`
`sent to Google, a letter was sent to Facebook."
`
`Thejury was going to see a letter, and "the choice of language you are going to see is unfortunate,"
`
`said Baldauf. "To let the genie out of the bottle, Mr. Hulls responded and titled the e-mail back, 'Dear
`
`Piece of Shit.‘ I hope that doesn‘t appall anybody. Mr. Hulls is going to tell you he was angry, and this
`
`is the company that he poured his heart and soul into, brought it up from nothing, and here is a letter
`
`from someone he never heard of before, telling him that he has three days to pay up or stop."
`
`nrnnrn rnuurn'rr
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`Page:
`
`i 2 Next-»
`
`FIIIlI'II'TIIIr rTnnu
`
`6/9
`
` 
`
`

`

`  
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 8 of 10
`3/18/2019
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Wmifiiflsfiteflsdfiaflefiw Page 8 of 10
`KtHUtK LUIVIIVIENIJ
`3mm: II'IDDIUKI
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`JOE MULLIN
`
`Joe has covered the intersection of law and technology, including the world's biggest copyright and patent
`battles, since 2007.
`
`EMAILjoe.mu||in@arstechnica.com // TWITTER @joemullin
`
`
`
`Defense Strategy Hybrid Options for
`
`'«
`Army's Next
`*1 (Vertical) Lift En
`
`Route
`
`SITREP: President
`
`Trump's Missile
`
`.
`-
`-
`Army 5 Next (Vertical) L1ft En
`Route
`
`US's Next Top
`Fighter
`
`Contenders for the Army's Blackhawk helicopter
`replacement are changing the shape of rotary flight.
`
`.
`6') More Vldeos
`
`<— PREVIOUS STORY
`
`NEXT SiORY—>
`
`Related Stories
`—
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
`Judge: Company must
`pay $684k for suing
`Life360 in “exceptionally
`weak” patent case
`
`Newegg trial: Closing
`arguments wrap up,
`verdict is near
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`Newegg on trial: Mystery
`company TQP rewrites
`the history of encryption
`
`“Patent troll" with a big
`verdict against Cisco
`notches a Supreme Court
`win
`
`7/9
`
`" 
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`  
`
`Sponsored Stories
`Powered by
`
`
` ,..
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 9 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185—HSG Wmaeatemeweaflmaag Page 9 of 10
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`
`
`
`
`[Pics] What This
`Mama Bear Did
`After Man Saved
`Her Cubs is
`Heartwarming
`Science 101
`
`[Pics] Man Notices
`A Strange Hole In
`A Lake 50 He Gets
`a Drone Flies It
`Inside and
`Captures This
`Ice Pop
`
`[Pics] 96-Year-0ld
`Puts Her House
`On The Market.
`Look At What The
`Inside Is Like
`Finance 101
`
`Seniors With No
`Life Insurance
`Should Do This
`Before Wasting
`Any More Money
`customertoday.org
`
`Filing Your Taxes
`as Head of
`Household? Read
`This
`TurboTax®
`
`District Of
`Columbia: Gov't
`Will Pay
`$260lMonth Off
`Your Mortgage If
`You Have No
`Missed Payments
`(You Must Qualify)
`customertoday.org
`
`Today on Ars
`—
`
`Google, Microsoft work
`together for a year to
`figure out new type of
`Windows flaw
`
`Myspace apparently lost
`12 years’ worth of music,
`and almost no one
`noticed
`
`Report: Trump “would
`17
`never get in a self-driving
`car
`
`Apple Watch accurately
`spotted heart condition
`34% of the time in study
`
`Former Valve designer,
`writer dishes on his new
`
`“co-op" game studio
`
`Apple updates $499 iPad
`Air, $399 iPad mini ahead
`of services event next
`week
`
`SpaceX may begin testing
`its Starship spacecraft
`this week
`
`D-Wave 2000Qhands-on:
`Steep learning curve for
`quantum computing
`
`STORE
`
`SUBSERIBE
`
`CONTACT US
`
`STAFF
`
`NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
`ABOUT US
`
`RSS FEEDS
`
`VIEW MOBILE SITE
`
`ADVERTISE WITH US
`
`REPRINTS
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`
`
`Email address
`
`SUBSCRIBE
`
`
`
`8/9
`
` 
`
`

`

`3/18/2019
`
`  
`
` ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ

`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 51-4 Filed 03/29/19 Page 10 of 10
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG [Bismumwcfijts4atefiiledi gig/29m Page 10 of 10
`
`CN MN Collection
`WIRED Media Group
`© 2019 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use ofand/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our
`User Agreement (updated 5/25/18) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 5/25/18) and Ars Technica Addendum
`(effective 8/21/2018). Ars may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy.
`Your California Privacy Rights
`The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior
`written permission of Condé Nast.
`Ad Choices
`
`https:llarstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/how-life360-won-its-patent—war/
`
` 
 
 !   
 
 
`
`9/9
`
` 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket