throbber
Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 49 Filed 03/15/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone:
`(212) 209-4800
`Facsimile:
`(212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
` Case No. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`NOTICE REGARDING CONTINUATION
`OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
`FOR SANCTIONS (L.R. 7-7(a))
`
`
`
`Initial Hearing Date: May 9, 2019
`Updated Hearing Date: June 6, 2019
`Time:
` 2:00 p.m. PST
`Trial Date:
` None set
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, et
`al.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`NOTICE REGARDING CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 49 Filed 03/15/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(a), Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS
`
`
`
`
`
`Software” or “Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby continues the hearing on
`
`Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 48) from May 9, 2019 to June 6, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. PT:
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on February 20, 2019, AGIS Software served via email and overnight mail to
`
`counsel for Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”): (1) Defendant’s Notice of Motion and Motion for
`
`Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 11”), and all
`
`accompanying declarations and exhibits (the “Motion”); and (2) correspondence attaching the
`
`Motion, explaining that, as further set forth in the Motion, ZTE’s Second Amended Complaint
`
`(“SAC”) asserts claims of personal jurisdiction that lack a legal or factual basis, in violation of Rule
`
`11(b), and requesting that ZTE’s counsel withdraw the SAC within the 21 day period set by Rule
`
`11(c) to avoid the filing of the Motion;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Motion set a hearing date of May 9, 2019, the earliest available hearing
`
`date on the Court’s calendar as of February 20, 2019, the date the Motion was signed and served on
`
`ZTE’s counsel;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on March 13, 2019, counsel for ZTE sent AGIS Software’s counsel a letter
`
`response indicating that ZTE would not withdraw the SAC;
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the 21 day period set forth in Rule 11(c) expired on March 13, 2019;
`
`WHEREAS, on March 15, 2019, AGIS Software filed the Motion, in compliance with Rule
`
`11(c) (Dkt. 48);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, as of March 15, 2019, the Court’s calendar indicated that the Court was no
`
`longer available for hearing on May 9, 2019, and that the earliest available hearing date was June 6,
`
`2019;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, in accordance with Local Rule 7-7(a), no opposition has been filed to the
`
`Motion, and this Notice is being filed prior to ZTE’s deadline to file an opposition to the Motion,
`
`which is not until March 29, 2019;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`NOTICE REGARDING CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 49 Filed 03/15/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(a), AGIS Software hereby continues the
`
`
`
`
`
`hearing on the Motion (Dkt. 48) from May 9, 2019 to June 6, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. PT.
`
`
`Date: March 15, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Peter Lambrianakos
`
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Sarah G. Hartman
`CA Bar No. 281751
`Email: shartman@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar
`CA Bar No. 297787
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, CA 92612
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`NOTICE REGARDING CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket