Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 44-1 Filed 03/11/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Michael Liu Su (SBN 300590)
`michael.liu.su@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice)
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice)
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone:
`(571) 203-2700
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-06185-HSG
`(Former Case No. 2:17-cv-00517-JRG)
`(E.D. Tex.)
`
`DECLARATION OF BRADFORD C.
`SCHULZ IN SUPPORT OF ZTE (USA)
`INC.’s ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO REMOVE FILED DOCUMENS
`FROM CASE FILE AND DOCKET
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHULZ DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ZTE (USA) INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE FILED DOCUMENTS FROM CASE
`FILE AND DOCKET
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 44-1 Filed 03/11/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I, Bradford C. Schulz, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate with the law firm of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`
`Dunner, LLP, counsel of record for plaintiff ZTE (USA), Inc. (“ZTE”) in the above-captioned
`
`matter. I submit this declaration in support of ZTE (USA) Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Remove
`
`Filed Documents from Case File and Docket (the “Administrative Motion”). I have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration, and, if called to do so, I could and would
`
`competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`On March 6, 2019 at 4:25 PM (EST), counsel for AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`(“AGIS”) demanded that ZTE confirm by 8:00 PM (EST) that “it will immediately withdraw the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`foregoing Exhibits.” The Exhibits and documents (the “Documents”) identified are as follows: Dkt.
`
`11
`
`Nos. 42-4, 42-6, 42-7, 42-8, 42-9, 42-10, 42-11, 42-12, 42-13, and 42-14; the originally filed
`
`12
`
`highlighted ZTE’s Response to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“Response”), the
`
`13
`
`originally filed highlighted Declaration of Bradford C. Schulz in Support of the Response, and the
`
`14
`
`originally filed Exhibits 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, and 34.
`
`15
`
`3.
`
`Counsel for ZTE confirmed at 7:40 PM (EST) on March 6, 2019 that, although ZTE
`
`16
`
`disagreed that the Documents in question needed to be withdrawn from the record, to avoid a
`
`17
`
`protracted dispute, it will “work to withdraw the [Documents].”
`
`18
`
`4.
`
`Counsel for ZTE, at 7:22 PM (EST) on March 7, 2019, provided counsel for AGIS
`
`19
`
`drafts of the Administrative Motion and an accompanying joint stipulation as required by Civil L.R.
`
`20
`
`7-11 and 7-12.
`
`21
`
`5.
`
`Counsel for AGIS, at 4:22 PM (EST) on March 8, 2019, responded but did not
`
`22
`
`consent to the Administrative Motion or accompanying joint stipulation.
`
`23
`
`6.
`
`On March 8, 2019, counsel for ZTE again requested AGIS’s election of, either filing
`
`24
`
`the Administrative Motion with the joint stipulation or with a declaration, by Monday, March 11,
`
`25
`
`2019, 5:00 PM (PST).
`
`26
`
`7.
`
`Under Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(1) & (2), March 11, 2019 is AGIS’s due date to file a
`
`27
`
`declaration with respect to ZTE’s sealing Administrative Motion filed on March 5, 2019. Dkt. 42.
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`SCHULZ DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ZTE (USA) INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE FILED DOCUMENTS FROM CASE
`FILE AND DOCKET
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 44-1 Filed 03/11/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Counsel for ZTE received notice at 4:49 PM (PST), March 11, 2019, from AGIS’s
`
`counsel that AGIS did not consent to the joint stipulation, under Civil L.R. 7-11 and 7-12, for the
`
`Administrative Motion.
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 11, 2019 at Reston,
`
`Virginia.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 11, 2019
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Bradford C. Schulz
`By:
`Bradford C. Schulz
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2019.3.7 Schulz Decl ISO Mtn to Remove_vfinal
`
`
`
`2
`
`SCHULZ DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ZTE (USA) INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE FILED DOCUMENTS FROM CASE
`FILE AND DOCKET
`CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-HSG
`
`