`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone:
`(212) 209-4800
`Facsimile:
`(212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
` Case No. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`Second Amended Complaint Filed: 05-FEB-2019
`Deadline to Respond: 19-FEB-2019
`
`May 9, 2019
`Hearing Date:
`2:00 p.m. PST
`Time:
`Trial Date: None Set
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, et
`al.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 18-cv-06185
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 41-5 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`The Court, having considered Defendant AGIS Software Development, LLC’s Motion to
`
`Dismiss Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc.’s Second Amended Complaint, including all briefing and
`
`argument associated therewith, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED, and the Second
`
`Amended Complaint dismissed without leave to amend.
`
`
`DATED: ______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
`U.S. District Court Judge
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 18-cv-06185
`
`