Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 52 Filed 12/18/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (SBN 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (SBN 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (SBN 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER B. KASTENS (SBN 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`AUSTIN MANES (SBN 284065)
`amanes@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`
`CLEMENT ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
`croberts@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5759
`
`AMY K. VAN ZANDT (SBN 197426)
`avanzant@orrick.com
`FRANCES CHEEVER (SBN 287585)
`fcheever@orrick.com
`EVAN D. BREWER (SBN 304411)
`ebrewer@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`Telephone: (650) 614-7400
`Facsimile: (650) 614-7401
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER
`EXTENDING CERTAIN DEADLINES
`
`
`
`
`
`
` CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`v.
`
`
`CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation, CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
`TECHNOLOGIES Ltd., an Israeli Limited
`Company,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 52 Filed 12/18/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and (b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and
`
`Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
`
`(together, “Check Point”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby
`
`stipulate to extend the time for certain deadlines over the holidays, in order to accommodate
`
`preexisting travel schedules of attorneys and staff.
`
`WHEREAS, none of the following proposed extensions will have any effect on the reminder of
`
`this case;
`
`WHEREAS, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.’s answer to Finjan’s Complaint is
`
`currently due on December 20, 2018 (see Dkt. 48);
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), and in order to accommodate holiday travel
`
`schedules, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Check Point Software
`
`Technologies Ltd. to answer the Complaint in this action until January 8, 2019;
`
`WHEREAS, Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.’s Opposition to Finjan’s Motion to
`
`Strike Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. 49) is currently due on December 19, 2018, Finjan’s Reply is
`
`currently due on December 26, 2018, and the hearing is currently set for January 16, 2019;
`
`WHEREAS, Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. requested a brief extension of the time to
`
`file its Opposition to Finjan’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, and in order to accommodate
`
`holiday travel schedules, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the due date for the
`
`Opposition until December 28, 2018 and the due date for the Reply until January 8, 2019;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court previously modified the schedule in this case twice: once to adjust the
`
`briefing schedule for Finjan’s Motion to Impute Service by less than one week for each side (Dkt. 35)
`
`and once to extend the hearing date on Finjan’s Motion to Impute Service by seven days (Dkt. 42).
`
`NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that: (1) Check Point Software
`
`Technologies Ltd.’s answer to Finjan’s Complaint shall be due on January 8, 2019; and (2) Check
`
`Point Software Technologies, Inc.’s Opposition to Finjan’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses
`
`shall be due on December 28, 2018, and Finjan’s Reply shall be due on January 8, 2019.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
`
`1
`
` CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 52 Filed 12/18/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Austin Manes
`By: /s/
`Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
`James Hannah (SBN 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (SBN 254797)
`Austin Manes (SBN 284065)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`amanes@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Clement Roberts
`By: /s/
`Clement Roberts
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON
`& SUTCLIFFE LLP
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`croberts@orrick.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 18, 2018
`
`
`
`Dated: December 18, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Amy K. Van Zandt (SBN 197426)
`Frances Cheever (SBN 287585)
`Evan Brewer (SBN 304411)
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON
`& SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`avanzant@orrick.com
`fcheever@orrick.com
`ebrewer@orrick.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`CHECK POINT
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
`
`2
`
` CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 52 Filed 12/18/18 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`By: /s/ Austin Manes
`
`Austin Manes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
`
`3
`
` CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 52 Filed 12/18/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`ORDER
`
`Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.’s answer to Finjan’s Complaint shall be due on
`
`January 8, 2019. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.’s Opposition to Finjan’s Motion to Strike
`
`Affirmative Defenses shall be due on December 28, 2018, and Finjan’s Reply shall be due on January
`
`8, 2019.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing is continued to JANUARY 23, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 18, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
`
`4
`
` CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-02621-WHO
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`